Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using the space of an entire wafer for one chip would result in extremely low manufacturing yields. Even with state of the art silicon cleanrooms, there will still be defects in parts of the output. With CPUs and GPUs, chip makers can disable faulty cores and bin them as lower SKUs to get some yield out of it. But if you're using an entire wafer to embed weights, and a speck of dust causes a printing defect that make…
What's the difference between disabling faulty cores and disabling the parts of the wafer that have defects?
OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
471–480 of 496 posts
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#472Earlier quoted context omitted.
i don't understand what the second paragraph is saying.
In very crude terms, AFAICT , if you have a bunch of matrix multiplications, but one of matrices (the one with model weights) doesn't change, you can seriously speed up the computation. One thing is that you don't need to re-fetch the elements of the constant matrix, you can keep it near the ALUs. Then you maybe can detect and ignore sparse / empty blocks by marking them once. IDK how the custom hardware exploits thi…
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#473Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh, zero guarantees on that one. The Fire Phone was Jeff Bezos' personal baby, and we know how that went. Then there was the Apple G4 Cube with Steve Jobs, the Model X' Falcon Wing doors and Elon, and lets not even talk about the Metaverse and Zuck.
> The Fire Phone was Jeff Bezos' personal baby, and we know how that went. I'd rather guess that Jeff Bezos' opinion on what makes a good phone is/was different on the opinion of many potential buyers.
I imagine when you are a billionaire from one company, every time you hear the name of the company you hear your name, so you can't really think about what Joe Schmoe wants in a phone independently of your ego.
I guess this is what Steve Jobs was better at. SOME focus on the customer independent of his ego and Apple Apple Apple. I did say ... SOME.
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#474> Developed from design to production in nine months, accelerated by OpenAI’s models > the use of OpenAI models to accelerate parts of the design and optimization process. I wish there was more about this. As is I kind of have to assume that this is just meaningless marketing, like saying development was accelerated by Microsoft Office or their 5k LG Ultrafine 40-inch monitors. Like, if this was as big a deal as it k…
Broadcom already has a ton of IP for AI SoCs. I'm guessing the hard parts of this inference chip was already designed by Broadcom and OpenAI simply told Broadcom what it wanted. It's likely very similar to Google's TPU. Early testing shows that the first-generation accelerator will deliver performance per watt substantially better than current state-of-the-art What is substantial here? Vera Rubin is shipping in volum…
So one of my pet theories I haven't seen in general discourse is that AI came from the massive vector processing jump available commercially in GPUs when it left CPU bound processing behind. That's a factor of 100x-1000x of processing power.
AI is not-quite-there, and to get even another leap might take another 10-100x processing power.
Now... what? ASICs probably won't deliver even a 10x? There's only so much you get out of node shrinks.
"Substantial" doesn't even mean twice IMO. "Substantial" almost sounds like ... 15% better?
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#475Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Or a military drone which needs to be jamming proof. That, if used in war, I would think, would need the ability to be updated frequently. For example, your enemy might find out (say by running tests on hardware they captured from you) that painting some red paint in a particular shape (a smiley might even work) on their hardware prevented your drones from attacking them because it confuses that pattern with the Re…
You keep the "reasoning core" burned and play the cat-and-mouse game at the I/O edge. Enemy invents a smiley shield, your R&D figures out some filtering step that defeats this effect without compromising general image recognition. Then the enemy figures out a new trick, your R&D invents a countermeasure, and so on - point is, this can happen for a long time in layers on top of the core model. If the enemy invents som…
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#476Earlier quoted context omitted.
In fact any application where the task is stable and the model good enough to address that task. As you suggest, industrial applications where a robot must deal with variants of the same repetitive task. Or a military drone which needs to be jamming proof.
> Or a military drone which needs to be jamming proof. That, if used in war, I would think, would need the ability to be updated frequently. For example, your enemy might find out (say by running tests on hardware they captured from you) that painting some red paint in a particular shape (a smiley might even work) on their hardware prevented your drones from attacking them because it confuses that pattern with the Re…
[1] Yes, this is a massive simplification
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#477Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#478Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the folks at PA Semi had some chops too.
The way I heard it PA Semi was the singular driving force that led to Apple Silicon, but I'm not any kind of insider that's just the chatter I heard. Whoever it was, whooo, that's hot shit. I remember an M1 MacBook Air just cleaning the clock of an Intel MacBook Pro and thinking "x86_64 has real competition again". Great silicon. I'm over it with not having root on my own machine, so I've left the ecosystem, but it's…
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#479Earlier quoted context omitted.
If GPUs have 75% margin then 50% cheaper is no surprise.
Operational costs far outweight hardware cost.
At $0.07/kWh, that costs $70,000 every hour in just electricity. $1.7 million /day. $613 million /year.
I had claude estimate the GPU cost of such a deployment:
> To get racks per GW: a full NVL72 rack draws roughly 130-132 kW under full load. If a 1 GW facility runs ~715 MW of IT power (after a ~1.4 PUE for cooling), that's on the order of 4,000–4,500 racks. At $3.4M of compute hardware each, the GPU-system cost lands around $14–15 billion.
15 billion / 613 million / year = ~24.5 years til electricity costs catch up to the GPUs. Obviously electricity isn't 100% of OpEx, but I'd expect it to be the majority for AI deployments.
Regardless, if you can cut the $613 million/yr in half that's still massive savings.
Re: OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom
#480Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried making a button using Claude entirely (including the 3D printed enclosure) and it effed up pretty hard with the traces and the header spacing. The project was a big red arcade button that plays the "ah-my-groin.mp3" when pushed (from Simpsons). It did cool work on saving battery life, and the 3d enclosure was awesome, but yeah, I'm convinced I'd have to do another version or two of the custom chip until it ca…
Sounds like a super cool project. Gonna post the design anywhere?