Live data from Hacker News

Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

github.com

471–480 of 534 posts

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#471

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The way it is done with meme pictures is bizarre. The language used is the same that Tridgell knows from the LKML, so that is not the primary concern. How are maintainers supposed to know that users don't trust AI if no one voices that concern? rsync was very stable. Should people silently move to Openrsync and never say anything?

How are the maintainers supposed to know that the users don’t trust VS Code if no one voices their concerns like a rabid mob? Seriously why should the maintainer care what users think about how they produce code? Bugs happen, regressions happen regardless of whether it’s human or AI written. The only valid criticism is that he’s moving too fast for quality code review by others. That said, I bet if you search through…

The only thing AI and VS Code have in common is that they are both tools. But thats where it stops.

The workflow is totally different, even though the output might look the same. When coding "by hand", thinking and reasoning is mandatory. When using LLMs its optional.

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#473
post #417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They shit talk those who also don't make but use AI to destroy.

Which are identical to those who wrote rsync in the first place. So given the rsync author did not make anything in the first place, they also cannot go destroy rsync as there is nothing to destroy. But well done defending abuse.

Your opinions would have much more weight if you didn't use your sockpuppet account to express them.

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#474

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> The industry standard is that most code changes are AI generated. That is absolutely not the case.

Everyone I know from every company I know no longer writes their code by hand anymore. Doing it by hand is the exception.

Anecdotally I find it true, but I haven't seen actual industry wide surveys.

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#475

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have any links to commits or changes that you think are "uncalled for"? Like, you say "he is making large and sweeping changes that are entirely uncalled for and cause breakage", so surely you have some examples? As far as I can tell, most of the AI-assisted changes were security fixes and test-suite related, and I'm sure you can agree that both of those are normal maintenance.

Take a look at the commit graph. Activity is at an all-time high by far, which it absolutely should not be. As an example, the entire test suite was recently vibe-replaced. An essential component for reliability and stability. And you can already see the results in the decreased stability and increased defect count.

False. These were fixing the vulnerabilities which are at all time high due to related reasons.

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#476
post #473

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which are identical to those who wrote rsync in the first place. So given the rsync author did not make anything in the first place, they also cannot go destroy rsync as there is nothing to destroy. But well done defending abuse.

Your opinions would have much more weight if you didn't use your sockpuppet account to express them.

Why? You want to send a mob to harass me like people you defend did with the rsync author?

I'm not interested in that. So I'll ignore your demands. Find yourself a different target.

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#477

This anti-AI hysteria is just such a classic moral panic. It’s just 1) identify something as AI-produced 2) attack and ostracize anyone who might be involved in that production And as with all moral panics, whether (1) is factual is totally beside the point. The point is the almost sexual release you get from (2). I know in this case there is AI-produced code in rsync (as there is with most useful software by now), b…

witch hunts occur in search of something that isnt real, it is very real that unmitigated ai usage causes problems

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#478
post #437

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I did not say any of that.

What were you trying to say? Because what you wrote is what parent responded to. > there is no evidence that tridge did this regression testing What evidence would you be looking for? New tests, like the ones added in the AI-assisted commits? What other evidence? > If tridge did test for regressions, but chose not to document the regression Presumably you weren't trying to imply here that tridge found a regression an…

[deleted]

Re: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software

#480
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. There is no "anti-AI derangement", the reaction to slop is normal.

Spamming an open source developer with angry comments because they decided to use a new tool for the code they write and publish freely is not normal.

> because they decided to use a new tool for the code they write

That's not why the comments are angry. The anger is directed at the slop approach to code review.

I guarantee you the same anti-AI people wouldn't give a shit if the author used an AI-enabled IDE and personally vetted all commits.

Post reply on HN