Microsoft starts canceling Claude Code licenses

Post by Quothling » Sun, May 24, 2026, 12:19 PM UTC

pwarner wrote: post #458

Quothling wrote: post #373

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe it's just Microsoft moving to more model agnostic tech within their copilot. I recently started using Microsoft 365 Copilot because corporate added Cowork which runs on Opus 4.7 which was better than the alternative we have available. Unlike the "real" Claude Code or Cowork this only has access to files in a specific onedrive folder in your personal sharepoint container, so it's much more compliant to things li…

Copilot Cowork seems to be the best part of M365 Copilot by a huge margin.

Post by bel8 » Sun, May 24, 2026, 2:40 PM UTC

loloquwowndueo wrote: post #472

bel8 wrote: post #459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure success is not guaranteed. But dogfooding helps. Should Microsoft have stopped dogfooding because of Zune? They are worth multiples of trillion dollars so I would wager they know a little more about success than you and me.

> They are worth multiples of trillion dollars so I would wager they know a little more about success than you and me. Hahahaha. Are you saying that if we did what they do we’d be successful? Because I’m perfectly happy to be where I am if it means I’m nothing, nothing at all like Microsoft.

Post by [deleted] » Sun, May 24, 2026, 3:40 PM UTC

arkadiytehgraet wrote: post #468

solenoid0937 wrote: post #457

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What does frequency bias have to do with the objective fact that hundreds of people reported This isn't hard to understand "Model is nerfed" claim hits social media Someone else sees it, frequency bias makes them think their model is also nerfed, and they amplify the claim Now it spreads, like a virus, even if the model never changed Social dynamics like this are well understood psychologically > If the LLM used to…

Did your LLM context get blown up or why does your comment read like linkedin-style post with one-liner sentences structure? Did you really just claim that people are so gullible that it was social media or whatever that made them believe their LLM could no longer achieve the tasks it yesterday could, and not the actual FACT of LLM not being able to do it that they, you know, verified before complaining online? I gue…

Post by Quitschquat » Sun, May 24, 2026, 4:24 PM UTC

harimau777 wrote: post #266

The comments I see recommending selective use of cheaper models doesn't match the reality I experience working in the industry. I have the constant threat hanging over my head of being fired if I don't churn out code quickly enough. I'm not willing to gamble with my livelyhood by using a less effective model. Saving money on tokens isn't something that's rewarded during performance reviews; particularly because it's…

Post by shomp » Sun, May 24, 2026, 6:20 PM UTC

onlyrealcuzzo wrote: post #469

zarzavat wrote: post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> LLMs don't really scale if you're still the bottlneck This only works if there's no consequences if your code breaks. In the eyes of other humans you're responsible for what you commit. No amount of "scaling" will change that.

> This only works if there's no consequences if your code breaks. In the eyes of other humans you're responsible for what you commit. No amount of "scaling" will change that. You're only responsible for what you merge to master, not everything you commit to a feature branch no one is looking at... If you have the testing and the infrastructure in place such that you can't ship broken code, then you just need to make…