I'm in BC. The astro-nerd in me would have preferred to see permanent Standard Time instead of a permanent +1 offset. Instinctively, I think morning light is important to our biology for a daily reset and the solar cue of "high noon" is also a real thing. I'm sure I've read that sleep health experts have historically supported a change to permanent Standard Time, not DST. I respect there are economic arguments for pe…
Yes, science is very clear: Permanent standard time is best for health.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/07487304198541...
https://srbr.org/advocacy/daylight-saving-time-presskit/
https://esrs.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/To_the_EU_Commiss...
https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-cal...
https://jcsm.aasm.org/doi/10.5664/jcsm.10898
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsr.14352
https://www.chronobiocanada.com/official-statements
But I think the scientists have made a mistake in their communication: They focused too much arguing against the clock-shifts, and didn't put enough effort to communicate why also permanent DST is a bad choice.