Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster

reuters.com

471–480 of 1001 posts

Re: OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster

#471

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasn't this supposed to happen when PCs came out?

And the Loom

Things did become worse at first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Condition_of_the_Working_C...

Then new ideologies and social movements emerged with the explicit purpose of making things better, which caused changes to happen for the better.

Re: OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster

#472
post #458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except that there's a fairly large body of evidence that persuasion is of limited use in shifting political opinion. So the persuasion would need to be applied to something other than some sort of causative political-implication-laden argument.

When you say persuasion, are you referring to fact based, logical argument? Because there are lots of other types of persuasion and certainly some work very well. Lying and telling people what they want to hear without too many details while dog whistling in ways that confirm their prejudices seems to be working pretty well for some people.

Just to add that a lot of people don't care about facts. In fact, if acting according to facts make me lose $$ I'd probably start building lies.

Re: OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster

#473

> I guess when you set up a board of directors tasked with not letting the company accidentally destroy the human race you set up a showdown when the board thinks the company will accidentally destroy the human race https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/1727463238051229734

[deleted]

Re: OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster

#475
post #64

There will come a day when 50% of jobs are being done by AI, major decisions are being made by AI, we're all riding around in cars driven by AI, people are having romantic relationships with AI... and we'll STILL be debating whether what has been created is really AGI. AGI will forever be the next threshold, then the next, then the next until one day we'll realize that we passed the line years before.

[deleted]

Re: OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster

#476
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Discussed in another thread, but what OpenAI might call AGI and what other people might call AGI are two different things: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38316378#38319586

I just tried to Google the Open AI definition of AGI and found a reddit thread about someone editing the Wikipedia definition of AGI to match the OpenAI one. https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/s/64wGaH0P9C

Ah. Current Wikipedia text: " An artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a hypothetical type of intelligent agent.[1] If realized, an AGI could learn to accomplish any intellectual task that human beings or animals can perform.[2][3] Alternatively, AGI has been defined as an autonomous system that surpasses human capabilities in the majority of economically valuable tasks.[4][promotion?]".

You can see the edit warring in the history, around "economically valuable tasks".

Post reply on HN