- increasingly ignores your search keywords, instead shoving unrelated stuff at you - removed ability to sort videos by date - removed dislikes what else.....youtube UX has being getting worse for a few years.
In the early days, YouTube had a 5 star rating system which I think is better than a binary like/dislike. You also could customize your channel more including custom backgrounds.
YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
471–480 of 550 posts
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#472Earlier quoted context omitted.
Premium moved me from being a consumer of a content made by big companies (including movies, and most of the shows) towards more independent content creators. I couldn't be more happy about it.
How do YouTube creators get paid from premium subscribers, is it fractions of a cent per minute watched or something?
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#473YouTube for the things I enjoy has improved dramatically because the comment section is vastly improved. Everyone used to use YouTube comments as an example of a comment section dumpster fire, but they fixed it. I've seen the recommendations get better then worse then better again as they tweaked the algorithms. Right now it's better than it's ever been. Again, for me. One complaint: I like to upload interesting clip…
They're 'better' in tone, but for many videos the comments come across as very sycophantic which is a bit tiresome. That's not always the case though, so probably depends to some extent on the channel's community.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#474Can I get my dislike button back now? Youtube has been a significantly worse place since that.
And yeah, hiding the dislike count was an extremely weird/annoying move, given that it was a good quality indicator which is now completely gone. It doesn't matter if a video has 1M likes if it has 3M dislikes, in which case it probably sucks. Nor are you misled to believe a video with only 3k likes is bad if it doesn't have more than 22 dislikes.
As with everything you should keep context in mind. For example if you're watching a video on a political topic (or by a controversial character) then the ratio will be more even, even for high quality videos. But the point is: Give the user the information, don't assume they are dumb.
[0] Links for Chrome/Firefox/etc: https://returnyoutubedislike.com/install
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#475Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would it have a negative impact on the businesses who promote those videos? Yes. If it's a negative impact on the businesses who promote videos, how can you say your idea doesn't impact content creators?
Why would it have a negative impact on either the promoted businesses or the content creators? Promoted businesses currently pay based on (an estimate of) the number of views that the video will get. This would trivially adjust to paying based on the number of views that the sponsorship within the video gets -- that's why I mentioned the requirement to make this available through analytics. If the cost per view stays…
A sponsor pays $10,000 to a content creator.
And then, they get zero views of their embedded ad in the video.
They got literally nothing for their $10,000 investment.
And let's say, for the sake of argument, that YouTube does not pay $10,000 for the same video, or ones like it.
Now, the content creator gets less money than they would have before.
It's almost like content creators have already done this calculus, and concluded that the best way to create content is to promote things.
It's funny to me when someone is like, "Why doesn't YouTube do X," and then they answer their own question, but then they still act like it's weird that YouTube doesn't do that thing.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#476YouTube for the things I enjoy has improved dramatically because the comment section is vastly improved. Everyone used to use YouTube comments as an example of a comment section dumpster fire, but they fixed it. I've seen the recommendations get better then worse then better again as they tweaked the algorithms. Right now it's better than it's ever been. Again, for me. One complaint: I like to upload interesting clip…
Agreed on the copyright issues! I got a strike for a short screen cast / video I made to demo a new feature I built to my boss -- it wasn't public, you had to have the link but I happened to feature some music (maybe 45-60 seconds) and it got taken down. Similarly I see YT content creators asking people to turn off their FM radios lest they end up with copyrighted music in their videos. Surely both of these cases are…
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#477Can I get my dislike button back now? Youtube has been a significantly worse place since that.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#478Discovery sucks on it, I feel like walking into an echo chamber everytime I go in
For example, if you don't want to read tangentially related pet peeves every time bigtechco is in the news, you stop coming to HN. You stop coming to HN, and only complainers are left.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#479I really hate youtube shorts. Can I completely turn them off? And whose idea was that??
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#480Earlier quoted context omitted.
Premium moved me from being a consumer of a content made by big companies (including movies, and most of the shows) towards more independent content creators. I couldn't be more happy about it.
How do YouTube creators get paid from premium subscribers, is it fractions of a cent per minute watched or something?