Live data from Hacker News

MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

apple.com

471–480 of 1001 posts

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#471
post #399

Nice. Ports are back. Very nice. Prices are up. Not nice. The deal breaker is the notch. Sorry Apple I am a designer. I cannot watch this 24/7. Even if the top bar is black the notch will be visible enough to distract my visual line. The more I look at this, the more I like the Framework laptop. P.S. Happy down-voting, have a nice day and stay safe.

Isn’t the notch strictly an improvement? The alternative is to lose that top area to a bezel. This feels like extra screen for free.

I agree with you on paper but I don't like how the notch just looks out of place. I don't see any way around it here, though; to get decent laptop cameras something has to give.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#472

what's the general need for microSD? My XPS-13 has one but I've never understood why its such a big deal. I almost never use it.

I am happy to get it, I still shoot with a large-sensor digital PAS camera and bought a hyperdrive just so I could rip the cards and have an HDMI port.

Excited to leave that thing behind.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#473
I don't plan to go back to MagSafe. I have multiport USB-C chargers all round my house and don't really want to buy lots of cables or proprietary chargers to add to the mix. I'm sticking with USB-C even if it's slower. SD cards I don't use. And HDMI I rarely use so dongles are fine, but it's nice to have I guess!

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#476

So we're back to 4 macbook laptops again with 3 of them being called 'Pro' Hmm

How do you count 4? The 13 and 16 will be phased out as old models and the 14/16 will remain. Then there's the MBA. So 3 models, with 2 of them being 'Pro'.

The regular M1 13" Pro is still being offered, I would probably still count that as the 4th model.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#478

A fair warning to developers: You're getting into an adventure with M1. From docker images not built for M1 with segmentation faults on qemu (eg. Liquibase for spring developers), to _significant_ troubles trying to make React native apps build with the M1 and XCode. Don't get me wrong, I have a Macbook air M1 and I love it, but it hasn't been a love without pain. Also, the magsafe feels like it comes too late. Almos…

Is there any reason Apple couldn't implement a magsafe type connector but using USB-C form factor? By that I mean, you could use any USB-C compatible cable in the same port (just without the magnetics)

It seems like they could have gotten the best of both worlds that way.

Am I taking crazy pills?

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#479
Priced out the one I would buy and it is $4300. Seems the value isn't quite there. Hard to say though without playing with it for a while. So clearly I need to go back to work for some tech company that will buy one for me :-).

It is more interesting to me to reflect on the comments from about 5 years ago that "ARM will never be in laptops, its a 'phone' processor."

That statement was both true and ignored the reality that if you wanted to put an ARM processor in a laptop you could add features and design it to work that way. Chip design is expensive of course, and so being a company like Apple really makes it possible to do this sort of thing as a 'risk' venture, but what surprises me is that Apple spent maybe $10B over the years developing an in house ARM design capability (after buying PA Semi) and here it is paying them some huge dividends.

If you compare that to Microsoft's efforts trying to use off the shelf ARM chips in the original Surface and now the Surface RT and you can really see the advantage of having the chip designers and the software designers depending on each other. That was true in the "WinTel" era when Intel and Microsoft were joined at the hip, but it was never the case for ARM CPU vendors who were more concerned about being in the next flagship phone than what ever it was that Microsoft was doing.

What an interesting alternate history if Microsoft decided to develop an in house production chip capability at the same time they decided to get into the hardware business for "real." [1]

[1] Yes, I'm aware they have done custom chips, the pixel/pen processor in the Surface is one such but they haven't really jumped in with both feet like Apple did, and certainly haven't had it front and center as long as Apple has.

Post reply on HN