Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

businessinsider.com

471–480 of 567 posts

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#471
post #450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not worried about the ecosystem. See VS Code.

If the acquisition goes through, VS Code is probably going to kill Atom, which is my go-to editor for many tasks. VS Code may be better overall, but it's not for me, and I'll have to change my workflow.

I agree. Atom is definitely in danger. They will not give up VS Code and maintaining two "identical" products makes no sense.

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#472
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I lived through the nineties as well, that doesn't mean I think everything that was amazing back then still is amazing today nor that everything that sucked back then still sucks today... I think the Microsoft of today is very different from the Microsoft of the nineties. Personally I'm not so much worried about Microsoft going back to Microsoft'95 but more about the fact that they, like most (all?) other big tech co…

How is Microsoft different exactly? Do they not engage in patents racketeering? Do they not spy on users of Windows 10? > like most (all?) other big tech companies "The other children are doing it" and then you're mother would say "that doesn't make it right". It's a child's defense no doubt. But anyway, it's also factually not true.

I'd say that Microsoft is worse than most other companies because it caters to governments, not consumers. Skype and MSN mysteriously worked in China at a time when no other service did. What's their incentive to push back against LE backdoors when they're not an edgy consumer brand anyway?

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#474
post #398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Office is ad-supported? vscode and typescript are ad-supported? MSSQL is ad-supported?

Hell, Windows is ad-supported now. Ever updated and get your free "gift" of Bubble Witch Saga 2: Electric Boogalo? I would pay double for an enterprise version of Win10 without that crap.

They do have an enterprise version of Windows 10...

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#475
I foresee a great future... for Gogs [1], Gitea [2], Gitlab [3] and other Github-alternatives. I was a late and somewhat reluctant adopter of Github as I don't like the idea of centralising so much of the free software infrastructure and putting it in the hands of one company, even a supposedly 'friendly' company like Github. I mirror everything I do on Github to a local Gitea-instance as a backup and exit strategy for when Github becomes a liability. If these talks go through and Microsoft does take over the latter will become true and I'll remove my accounts there.

[1] https://gogs.io/

[2] https://gitea.io/

[3] https://gitlab.com/

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#476
post #6

Really hope these talks fall through and nothing comes of it. Too many bad experiences with Microsoft buying something out, mismanaging it, and it goes down the drain. As much as I love GitHub, I won't be using a Microsoft-owned GitHub for any of my company's work.

Why does it matter to you so much who owns GitHub if it's a good tool? Sounds unnecessary vitriol.

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#477
post #6

Really hope these talks fall through and nothing comes of it. Too many bad experiences with Microsoft buying something out, mismanaging it, and it goes down the drain. As much as I love GitHub, I won't be using a Microsoft-owned GitHub for any of my company's work.

Why does it matter to you so much who owns GitHub if it's a good tool? Sounds unnecessary vitriol.

Some of us are old enough to remember Microsoft of the 90's and early aughties. "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" was the name of the game then, many of us haven't forgiven Microsoft for that yet (and nor do we plan to).

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#478
post #6

Really hope these talks fall through and nothing comes of it. Too many bad experiences with Microsoft buying something out, mismanaging it, and it goes down the drain. As much as I love GitHub, I won't be using a Microsoft-owned GitHub for any of my company's work.

I agree, as they say, 'snakebit and doomed to die' http://www.memidex.com/snakebit

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#479

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why does it matter to you so much who owns GitHub if it's a good tool? Sounds unnecessary vitriol.

Some of us are old enough to remember Microsoft of the 90's and early aughties. "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" was the name of the game then, many of us haven't forgiven Microsoft for that yet (and nor do we plan to).

And a more recent example: Skype.

Re: Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks

#480
post #157

Seems like the view here is pretty negative. I feel like most people here haven't worked with Microsoft dev products recently. They're getting better. I guess the crowd here isn't typically in the .NET world.

The fact that the Microsoft of the past 2 years is "getting better" at something they've tried to do for many decades is a great reason to be worried about them taking ownership of a product they are unfamiliar with. e.g. "GitHub is really starting to improve again" - Devs in 2050

Why do you think "they are unfamiliar with it"? On the contrary, Microsoft has a lot of stuff ongoing in GitHub. Seems many critical people in this thread don't have a clue.
Post reply on HN