Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT-5.4

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

461–470 of 868 posts

Re: GPT-5.4

#461

Post by pocksuppet »

Philip-J-Fry wrote: post #374

I find it quite funny how this blog post has a big "Ask ChatGPT" box at the bottom. So you might think you could ask a question about the contents of the blog post, so you type the text "summarise this blog post". And it opens a new chat window with the link to the blog post followed by "summarise this blog post". Only to be told "I can't access external URLs directly, but if you can paste the relevant text or descri…

Most AI integration is like this. It's not about building working products --- it's about bragging that you put a chatbox in your program.

Re: GPT-5.4

#462

Post by jbonatakis »

__jl__ wrote: post #335

What a model mess! OpenAI now has three price points: GPT 5.1, GPT 5.2 and now GPT 5.4. There version numbers jump across different model lines with codex at 5.3, what they now call instant also at 5.3. Anthropic are really the only ones who managed to get this under control: Three models, priced at three different levels. New models are immediately available everywhere. Google essentially only has Preview models! Th…

Google is already sending notices that the 2.5 models will be deprecated soon while all the 3.x models are in preview. It really is wild and peak Google.

Re: GPT-5.4

#464

Post by ElijahLynn »

Philip-J-Fry wrote: post #374

I find it quite funny how this blog post has a big "Ask ChatGPT" box at the bottom. So you might think you could ask a question about the contents of the blog post, so you type the text "summarise this blog post". And it opens a new chat window with the link to the blog post followed by "summarise this blog post". Only to be told "I can't access external URLs directly, but if you can paste the relevant text or descri…

fwiw: I get a valid response when following the steps you mentioned. I do not get the message you mentioned:

https://chatgpt.com/share/69aa0321-8a9c-8011-8391-22861784e8...

EDIT: oh, but I'm logged in, fwiw

Re: GPT-5.4

#465

Post by rurban »

delaminator wrote: post #342
__jl__ wrote: post #335

What a model mess! OpenAI now has three price points: GPT 5.1, GPT 5.2 and now GPT 5.4. There version numbers jump across different model lines with codex at 5.3, what they now call instant also at 5.3. Anthropic are really the only ones who managed to get this under control: Three models, priced at three different levels. New models are immediately available everywhere. Google essentially only has Preview models! Th…

two great problems in computing naming things cache invalidation off by one errors

Biggest problem right now in computing:

Out of tokens until end of month

Re: GPT-5.4

#466

Post by __jl__ »

Melatonic wrote: post #438
Aurornis wrote: post #387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What a model mess! OpenAI now has three price points: GPT 5.1, GPT 5.2 and now GPT 5.4. I don't know, this feels unnecessarily nitpicky to me It isn't hard to understand that 5.4 > 5.2 > 5.1. It's not hard to understand that the dash-variants have unique properties that you want to look up before selecting. Especially for a target audience of software engineers skipping a version number is a common occurrence and n…

Agreed - and its a huge step up from their previous naming schemes. That stuff was confusing as hell

I see your point. I do find Anthropic's approach more clean though particularly when you add in mini and nano. That makes 5 models priced differently. Some share the same core name, others don't: gpt 5 nano, gpt 5 mini, gpt 5.1, gpt 5.2, gpt 5.4. And we are not even talking about thinking budget.

But generally: These are not consumer facing products and I agree that someone who uses the API should be able to figure out the price point of different models.

Re: GPT-5.4

#469

Post by Multicomp »

gavinray wrote: post #84

The "RPG Game" example on the blogpost is one of the most impressive demo's of autonomous engineering I've seen. It's very similar to "Battle Brothers", and the fact that RPG games require art assets, AI for enemy moves, and a host of other logical systems makes it all the more impressive.

A cheesy Roller Coaster Tycoon clone in a browser, one-shotted from an AI? Amazing capabilities. The entire "low code drag n drop" market like YoYoGames Game Maker and RPG Maker should be ready to pack it in soon if this keeps improving in this way.

Re: GPT-5.4

#470

Post by ethbr1 »

embedding-shape wrote: post #404
jazzypants wrote: post #396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But, why include the non-functional chat box in the article?

Different team "manages" the overall blog than the team who wrote that specific article. At one point, maybe it made sense, then something in the product changed, team that manages the blog never tested it again. Or, people just stopped thinking about any sort of UX. These sort of mistakes are all over the place, on literally all web properties, some UX flows just ends with you at a page where nothing works sometimes…

> Or, people just stopped thinking about any sort of UX. These sort of mistakes are all over the place, on literally all web properties, some UX flows just ends with you at a page where nothing works sometimes.

It's almost like people are vibe coding their web apps or something.

Post reply on HN