Live data from Hacker News

Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

dexerto.com

461–468 of 468 posts

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Since corporations aren't people, Boeing didn't know anything. you have to recognize that a statement like this means that decision-makers at boeing either knew or were negligent in their duties .

Which is a hell of a thing to say without evidence.

After the first crash they knew for sure. Yet they didn't do anything to prevent the second one.

Before the first one yeah, you could claim that they might have had no idea this could possibly happen. I don't think that is the case but ok. The second crash however really shouldn't have happened.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Stop resisting...the flavor"

Man. People did not like this bit of thread.

To be fair, it was in poor taste. And against the general HN policy. I'm proud of my bad pun (in the best French tradition of never letting a bon mot go to waste), but not proud of posting it.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#463
post #444

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nobody saw a gun in a video. Nobody even saw something that looked like a gun. A chip bag, at most, is going to produce a bulge. No reasonable human is going to look at a kid with a random bulge in their pocket and assume gun. Otherwise we might as well start sending our kids to school naked; this is the kind of paranoia that brought us the McMartin Preschool nonsense.

Please provide the quote from the article, or link that lets you know, so confidently, that it wasn't passed through human review.

The presence or absence of human review is irrelevant. A system with stupid humans are just as bad as a system with stupid machines. They are complementary, really.

Nobody saw a gun. We know this because there was no gun.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#464
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Get Precheck or global entry. I only do a scanner every 5 years or so when I get pulled at random for it. Otherwise it's metal detector only. Unless your zippers have such chunky metal that they set that off you'll be fine. My belt and watch don't. Note: Precheck is incredibly quick and easy to get; and GE is time consuming and annoying, but has its benefits if you travel internationallly. Both give the same benefits…

The brownshirts will never get my money.

lol, enjoy torturing yourself to stick it to the man to save literally $24 a year cost of Global Entry.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#465
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Get Precheck or global entry. I only do a scanner every 5 years or so when I get pulled at random for it. Otherwise it's metal detector only. Unless your zippers have such chunky metal that they set that off you'll be fine. My belt and watch don't. Note: Precheck is incredibly quick and easy to get; and GE is time consuming and annoying, but has its benefits if you travel internationallly. Both give the same benefits…

...maybe not, but a few bucks could still solve this problem Sure, can't argue with that. But doesn't it bug you just a little that (paying a fee to avoid harassment) doesn't look all that disimilar from a protection racket? As to whether it's a few bucks or many, now you're just a mark negotiating the price.

> protection racket

It actually doesn't! Plenty of people never fly at all and many fly incredibly rarely. The Precheck and GE programs cost money to administer as they have to do background checks and conduct interviews. This actually accomplishes actual security goals, since it allows them to flag risky behavior and examine it.

Who benefits from these programs? Primarily heavy travelers (and optimizers like me who value their time saved more than the $24 a year). These programs also actually make everything better for everyone since I'm no longer taking up a space in the slower-moving, shoes-off line, and TSA/CBP get an actual background check done on me.

The way it is now, heavy travelers who can easily afford it, pay the full costs of the program.

Would you rather:

1. Precheck is free and paid for by all taxpayers even though a lot of people will never bother to enroll (you have to assume -- the cost is so low today that it can't be a barrier for almost anyone who can afford to fly, so it seems a ton of people can't be bothered to follow simple instructions and go get fingerprinted at Staples)

2. Precheck is eliminated and everyone has to go back to the dumb liquids-out, shoes-off thing

3. Precheck is eliminated and we just treat everyone like the Precheck people today, without doing any background checks. Basically like pre-9/11.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#466
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www2.ljworld.com/news/schools/2025/aug/07/lawrence-s... Another false positive by one of these leading content filters schools use - the kid said something stupid in a group chat and an AI reported it to the school, and the school contacted the police. The kid was arrested, stripped searched, and held for 24 hours without access to their parents or counsel. They ultimately had to spend time in probation, a fu…

> This is a paid addon, though Holy shitballs. In my experience such pain addons have very cheap labor attached to them, certainly not what you would expect based on the sales pitch.

This very much reminds me of Boeing's paid addon for a second AoA sensor for the MCAS system.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#467
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Far more deaths by automobile than homicides by guns.

In the US, guns and automobiles kill roughly the same number of people each year.

That's why I said homicides.

Re: Armed police swarm student after AI mistakes bag of Doritos for a weapon

#468
post #467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the US, guns and automobiles kill roughly the same number of people each year.

That's why I said homicides.

I was responding to your original comment.
Post reply on HN