Live data from Hacker News

Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

wsj.com

461–470 of 777 posts

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#461
post #298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you think it's a lesser crisis, you could just say that. I do, but the principal reason I didn't say that is that I had no idea it's what the commenter I replied to was referring to. 'Brexit' feels mostly completely irrelevant / not a topic of concern or debate since at least the beginning of the pandemic five years ago. The vote was almost a decade ago. 'If bdelmas thinks it's like Brexit, they could just say t…

The vote didn’t implement anything. Britain didn’t actually leave the EU until 2020. Brexit is as of much concern in Britain, still, as Trump is - because it underlies their entire shaken economy. You think some tariffs are bad? Ok now what if Trump simultaneously tore up every trade agreement ? And cancelled the visas of every European citizen in the country, who happened to make up 10% of the medical sector?

Oh, you’re actually British, how surprising. Perhaps it’s only still a topic among people who understood what was going to happen.

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#462
post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, because the math provides a much simpler explanation.

Napkin math cannot apply to Mexico and Canada tariffs, because the USMCA (and preceding NAFTA) have long intertwined North American manufacturing supply chains, with components moving back and forth across borders. Even the emergency border security tariffs and counter-tariffs announced earlier this year by US and Canada have since been carefully tailored for specific products and exceptions, as cooler heads prevaile…

The entire new tariff scheme is napkin math. Although it could also be napkin math done by some LLM.

If it was real math, it wouldn’t assume that there is some magical trade elasticity that is completely linear in the tariff rate. And real math might notice that the prices of goods that are subject to tariffs are an utterly absurd measure of value, cost, movement of money, or anything else.

Consider:

A US company does a bunch of R&D and designs a widget. They pay $10 each to a Chinese factory to manufacture it. They warehouse the widgets in Hong Kong. Each widget purchased by a US customer results in a “$100” item being imported. $90 stays in the US. $10 goes to China.

The same company does exactly the same thing except they ship in bulk to a US warehouse. The imported item is now “$10”. The tariff is 1/10 as much, the napkin math sees 1/10 as much trade imbalance, but the economic effect of the import is identical.

Or maybe they ship from Hong Kong to a French customer. This should be seen as an export from the US to France with $90 and an export from China to France worth $10. But I think it’s invisible to the napkin math.

Now consider that the US is home to some wildly successful companies with names like AMD and Nvidia. They sell chips for thousands of dollars each, worldwide. They pay TSMC quite a lot less to make them. If they warehouse in the US, they may be screwed now! If they ship from Taiwan to a buyer somewhere else, the US has, in effect, exported quite close to the full sale price of that chip, but no trade goods ever touched US soil. Can the napkin math sees that?

You can bet that several other countries use brains instead of napkins and will have no difficulty thinking that they could retaliate by restricting or taxing of these US-designed goods even if they’re imported from elsewhere. And China is working very hard to make their own alternatives, and they will surely be willing to export them.

(Don’t forget: The UK and Israel have CPU design expertise. ASML is dependent on tin zapping tech from San Diego, but they’re an EU company. And it looks like the successor to that tin zapping tech might be free electron lasers, and that technology come from US national labs and universities, but other countries also have FELs, and the nerdy physicists who fiddle with them are not happy with the US government right now.)

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#463
post #445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

America is the richest country in the world. That is the payback. Yet somehow the working class is screwed. People don't want to admit wealth distribution is the problem because that would make them "communists". It's an emotional response. I'm scared how far they take it.

Right, and I think that’s largely true. Whether or not the “right wing working class” are right in their root cause analysis, the domestic situation in the US is catastrophic enough to demand explanation: “If we are the richest country on earth, why can’t I afford a house and healthcare?” Answer 1: You are being taken advantage of by wealthy elites within your country! Answer 2: The whole world has made Americans fro…

I know. There is no reason to believe in #2. Its an emotional response. And so you cant change it. Just like you cant use logic with a flat earther. And that's scary for the rest of the world. I just hope no wars happen.

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#464
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m from Southern Ohio which was not hit as hard, but I know the attitude well. I call it “rust belt rage.” I remember during the first Trump election hearing quotes like “I hope he does as much damage as possible” and “I can’t throw a bomb into the White House but I can throw a Trump.” Lots more like that. The attitude in that region of the country is absolute seething rage. A lot of people from Northern Ohio, Weste…

> Imagine what the vibes would be on the West Coast if there was a huge set of policy changes that decimated and liquidated the high tech industries We had large inflation caused by Joe Biden's industrial revival acts (spurring a massive increase in factory construction (see https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/unpacking-th... ) that led to interest rate rises and a TON of tech layoffs! People on this foru…

> that led to interest rate rises

Interest rates didn't rise because of industrial revival acts; they rose because they had been artificially low for a decade and someone had to throw water on the economy to cool it lest hyperinflation hit.

> and a TON of tech layoffs!

The nature of tech layoffs and what has happened in the Midwest over the last 50 years are completely different. When a guy is let go from Meta, he's let go from a job that earned him well over the median salary for Americans. Provided he hasn't blown it out his ass on courses at microdosing at Esalen, he should have something in savings. He has resources. He has connections. He has opportunities. When you work in an area with that much money in it - remember, Larry Ellison, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg each have a net worth that puts them on par with the yearly gross economic product of small American metropolitan areas - you can recover.

When a guy was let go from an automotive parts supplier in Michigan in 1988, he's making near that median salary. He has far less cushion. The nature of his work does not allow him to simply open his laptop and toy around with new business ideas, or open a startup; his former employer was the employer in town. When it went under, the town went under, and he had no way to get out.

And that's before accounting for what the rusting hulks of machinery did to the town. Chemicals dumped before regulation poison the water and soil. Major swathes of real estate needing millions of dollars in cleanup before any real redevelopment can occur. Maybe the Feds will get around to it with the Superfund in a generation or two; the developer from back east sure as hell isn't going to pay for it. By the way, can the town - which is already short on funds - give them tax increment financing for that redevelopment? They'll never come out ahead otherwise. You can't just convert a former brake pad manufacturing plant to lofts like you can with a former tech headquarters in San Francisco.

> And are you saying that the US media doesn't pillory Californa as a liberal hellhole? I actually don't even know what distribution of media you consume that doesn't handwring over the morality of liberals.

... where are you getting that from OC's comment?

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#465

Does anyone have any idea where all of this tarrif(tax) revenue is going? I think it's a little more creative than just increasing wealth. Are there any bold visions or grand plans/futures in the works that this could be going towards?

Tax cuts for the rich. Defunding the IRS, cutting social services, and pushing tariffs to tax the working class are all consistent with needing to keep the government running without taxing the billionaires.

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#466
post #429

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What would it take for Canada to hit 2%? https://globalnews.ca/news/11050336/canada-defence-spending-... The US massively subsidizes Canada’s national defense and energy production (crude oil refining).

Thank you for providing me a front-row example of it. There's always one bullshit excuse or another. In reality, the US suppresses Canada's national defense, because for some weird reason, it doesn't want a heavily-armed neighbor. As for energy, for every dollar of it that it buys, it derives far more than a dollar of economic utility from it, which is why it's screaming bloody murder at the mere mention of Canada tu…

In reality, Canadians have bravely fought and died for American interests in the Middle East. Don’t take any of this as my personal view, or as a repudiation of the interpersonal camaraderie that Americans, by and large, still feel with Canadians (although I understand it’s no longer universally reciprocated).

However, as a matter of industrial economic reality, NAFTA likely benefited Canada more than it did the US, and the US does subsidize NATO and Canadian defense by extension. What barriers are there to an independent Canadian defense industry?

(Although I would argue that NAFTA benefited both countries, and we should continue our free trade agreements!)

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buy the dip?

Most wealthy people’s wealth is in investments. If the value of the investments goes down, there are fewer resources to “buy the dip.” It doesn’t hold water as a theory. Basically robbing Peter to pay Paul.

They have people whose jobs it is to even out those troughs, and I don't think you realize just how wealthy the wealthiest wealthy really are. Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and Larry Ellison each have a net worth that is on par with the total gross economic output of a small American metropolitan area.

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#468

Whatever, I'm in Canada and decided to cut down all costs. Fully expecting a recession as well as a depression. We thought about getting a new car, but not going to do that until in a few years when car sellers are begging me to take one. Right now they are so arrogant that they charge high rates and popular cars takes months to deliver. I'm gonna sit for another 3-4 years. Also decided to remove all travel plans fro…

> Fuck it. I just got a small raise and bonus but feel so insecure. I expect to lose job at any moment. just today 3 people from my network messaged me about losing their job and asking about some opportunity. They worked remotely for American companies (from Brazil).

Yeah, that's the uncertainty we all have to face. I hope they find some local jobs at least.

I don't even know what I can do if I can't find an IT job. I don't have any other skills.

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#469
post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You've completely ignored what I wrote. The formula the white house used to set tariffs would result in lower tariffs for Canada and Mexico. If both countries were included in the formula Trump would have to cut announced tariffs on both countries. Do you dispute this? It's trivial to calculate.

You're disagreeing with statements by the President of Mexico, describing the result of ongoing negotiations? Canada and Mexico share a physical border with USA, which has already resulted in unique (i.e. unrelated to the math of 180+ other countries which don't physically border USA) tariffs tailored to border security goals, under national security emergency directives which overrode USMCA. USMCA has been historica…

> As stated by the leadership of both Mexico and Canada, USMCA will need to be renegotiated to address issues identified by all three parties

On the canada side, i think the issue identified that needs to be addressed is the US president being a dick.

(I'm not being sarcastic here, that is my genuine impression. If you disagree can you cite a source for what issues canada wants addressed? Obviously times are a bit weird since we are having an election and its considered bad form for the gov to do anything during election season)

Re: Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

#470

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very well put. Alliances take years to build but can be broken in just days. I'm tempted to think (hope? dream?) that the markets and trade will rebound if all this chaos makes American politics swing back towards an interest in global stability, but I think anyone partnering with the US would do so VERY carefully and right now the entire world is plotting how to remove US dependencies.

To the extent markets recover it will be because there’s confidence that exposure to bizarre and unpredictable behavior from the US has been reduced. EU / China trade pacts, China / California, Mexico / EU. People have to patch around the mistaken over-reliance on sanity from the US. It’ll happen, not sure if it’ll take a few weeks or a few years though.

Oh, high quality will recover. Biotech will recover. It’s possible Walmart stock doesn’t recover. Auto makers will be interesting.
Post reply on HN