461–470 of 758 posts
The internet consumed itself. Telling someone to, "Just Google it," is now terrible general advice.
if everyone is using LLMs to solve problems, in a few years, won't LLMs run out of content to mine? In short, how can the general dumbing down of LLMs and degradation of content used to solve problems be avoided over the long term? For questions about events and problems that arose after 2025, where would LLMs get information to solve those? and who would be asking those at a forum LLMs can access going forward? Is t…
We need a way to collapse comments on HN
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is paramount to a functioning society to have zero tolerance for nazis.
Thank you for saying this. I recently heard that story "if you let one Nazi in your bar, pretty soon you have a Nazi bar"
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Grok's DeepSearch and DeeperSearch are also pretty good, and you can look at their stream of thought to see how it reaches its results. Not sure how OpenAIs version works, but grok's approach is to do multiple rounds of searches, each round more specific and informed by previous results
My disgust and hatred for Elon Musk prevents me from giving Grok a fair chance. I realize this is my psychological problem. I own it, but as far as I can tell, I'm not missing much.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think it should. If a user asks the AI to read the web for them, it should read the web for them. This isn't a vacuum charged with crawling the web, it's an adhoc GET request.
>You can now use Claude to search the internet to provide more up-to-date and relevant responses. It's a search engine. You 'ask it to read the web' just like you asked Google to, except Google used to actually give the website traffic. I appreciate the concept of an AI User-agent, but without a business model that pays for the content creation, this is just going to lead to the death of anonymously accessible conten…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may not be very long before the big majority of web searches are via AI. If that happens, blocking AI will mean blocking most people too. You’d already be blocking me as I’d guess I now search via AI >90% of the time between perplexity, chatgpt, deep research, and google search AI.
>It may not be very long before the big majority of web searches are via AI. If that happens, blocking AI will mean blocking most people too. If that happens a big majority of websites will go bankrupt and won't exist anymore to be searched. Problem solved!