Live data from Hacker News

Google releases smart watch for kids

store.google.com

461–470 of 809 posts

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#461
I really don't get it: paying a couple hundred so you can spend 2 seconds reaching for your wrist instead of 5 seconds pulling your phone out of your pocket

Like is the watch supposed to replace the phone? Or if not, why bother? If you need heart rate monitoring, why does it need an internet connection?

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Your kids don't learn independence and how to be self sufficient. Doesn't this depend on how the tracking is used, not on whether the tracking is present at all? My wife and I share our location with each other and I don't actually know if she uses my location at all. If she does, she doesn't mention it. I use it occasionally to get a sense for when to expect her back or to find her when we need to meet up for some…

I don’t care if my wife knows my location either. She’s my partner, not my parent. Thankfully, I’m not a teen trying to develop a sense of autonomy and self reliance independent of my wife’s supervision. As other posters have pointed out, no one really knows anything about anyone else’s life from an HN post. That said, the whole point of the panopticon is that if the prisoner doesn’t know when they’re being observed,…

> Thankfully, I’m not a teen trying to develop a sense of autonomy and self reliance independent of my wife’s supervision.

Just a note that I don't think anyone is thinking of these watches as being for teenagers. They appear targeted at much younger kids, 8-11ish.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#463

Ugh, I threw up a little in my mouth just from the headline. This constant tracking of kids is unnecessary and dangerous. Generations of kids survived without their parents needing to know their location at all times. And yes, I totally admit, some kids (very few actually depending on the locale) didn't survive. But we've traded this false sense of "safety" for kids that are so risk averse it is seriously negatively…

> Generations of kids survived without their parents needing to know their location at all times. Did they? The problem with this sort of claim is that it often turns out to be false. "We didn't have X and somehow we survived" often omits the fact that mortality in given demographics has dropped significantly since then. The people making this statement are survivors, and the ones who haven't survived don't speak up.…

The proof obligation is the other way around. You need to show that constant surveillance actually makes a difference, on a population level. Otherwise your claim is the empty one.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#464

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, our friends use airtags skiing and that would probably meet our needs. However we're in the Android ecosystem and there isn't really an airtag equivalent.

Samsung does have a comparable line of devices, but yeah, it's Samsung only.

AirTags have a huge network advantages in that a lot of people have iPhones. It’s not what you have, but what everyone else has that is important when finding things. That Google hasn’t bothered to compete, or the antitrust authorities haven’t out yet, is a complete mystery to me. Airtags alone have me firmly locked into owning an iPhone.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#465

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good lord. As I recall, a big part of growing up was spending time and doing things my parents didn’t want me to do. The idea of them tracking me is super creepy, as is tracking one’s spouse for that matter.

kids today will also remember in 30yrs from now how's they had so much freedom... they just had to leave their watch (btw, apple have had kid mode on their watches for a while now) in the school locker and they could roam around, heck maybe even get an uber to some place

If you worry about your parent knowing your exact location, then maybe it’s not a healthy parent-child relationship to begin with.

They don’t have to sit at school, and they can wander around, without telling me — but if there is a serious trouble then it’s in everyone’s interest to have a up to date location data.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should law-abiding citizens have to give up their right to defend themselves because criminals commit crimes?

Because it’s a stupid law that was thought of 200 years ago when there were actual reasons to have guns, whereas today you’d be safer without one

>whereas today you’d be safer without one

This is absolutely not the case unless you believe what happened in China, Russia and Cambodia in the 20th century, governments murdering hundreds of millions of their own people, somehow magically cannot happen again. Orders of magnitudes more people have been killed by their own government when they lacked any means to defend themselves than have been killed by school shooters or armed criminals.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#467
post #455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am wondering if we are raising a generation of people find it completely normal to be tracked all the time. How can we complain when our governmets do the same to us?

I wonder that too, but I think you are at least one generation too late with this. Your average phone already tracks where you go, with whom you interact, what you search for online. It asks you "how was this restaurant?" and reminds you what you did last year at this time. There is a miniscule minority of folks who care and disable as much of that as they can, but the vast majority doesn't know how and doesn't care.…

Sorry but this is just fatalistic nonsense. A generation ago people did not have anything like the current evolution of surveillance technology. The small number of people who care about ubiquitous surveillance right now are early adopters, not a dying breed.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#468

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Your kids don't learn independence and how to be self sufficient. Doesn't this depend on how the tracking is used, not on whether the tracking is present at all? My wife and I share our location with each other and I don't actually know if she uses my location at all. If she does, she doesn't mention it. I use it occasionally to get a sense for when to expect her back or to find her when we need to meet up for some…

I don’t care if my wife knows my location either. She’s my partner, not my parent. Thankfully, I’m not a teen trying to develop a sense of autonomy and self reliance independent of my wife’s supervision. As other posters have pointed out, no one really knows anything about anyone else’s life from an HN post. That said, the whole point of the panopticon is that if the prisoner doesn’t know when they’re being observed,…

> the whole point of the panopticon

Yeah I think this is an important point and I think it is also worth adding that this is the same premise of 1984. Not that Winston (or anyone) is being specifically surveilled by a physical person at any given time, but rather that Big Brother __could__ be watching/listening at any time.

And it is important to also stress the difference in power dynamics between husband/wife and parent/child. These are apples and oranges; both round fruit but different categories at an important level. Like you said, the teen is learning who they are while a partner has already made significant strides in this direction and (hopefully) has already learned autonomy. Children must make mistakes, but the goal is to prevent large ones. Difference between getting a burn by touching the stove and catching oneself on fire.

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good lord. As I recall, a big part of growing up was spending time and doing things my parents didn’t want me to do. The idea of them tracking me is super creepy, as is tracking one’s spouse for that matter.

>As I recall, a big part of growing up was spending time and doing things my parents didn’t want me to do. a big part of parenting is making sure your kid actually is at school, or monitoring more closely a child that has done improper things.

> a big part of parenting is making sure your kid actually is at school

Quite sure that is the schools job. At least where I live the schools tend to assume several of the rights and responsibilities that normally fall on the parents.

> or monitoring more closely a child that has done improper things.

Do I want to know what you fucked up in your childhood that you assume your kids need constant monitoring to prevent a repeat?

Re: Google releases smart watch for kids

#470
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's privacy-protecting; their location will be private, only you can track them all the time, the apps installed, Google and their SREs, the US government if they want to (but they most likely need to ask), etc.

>Privacy Protecting Words have meanings. And I don't think you know what they are. Google absolutely will be selling this location data to "improve the advertising experience".

It was a quote from their website, claiming this watch was privacy-protecting.

It seemed so absurd that I wanted to pinpoint it

Post reply on HN