Earlier quoted context omitted.
…you think calling someone “the best in the world” is a) purely factual b) not supportive Uh, what on earth would count as explicitly supportive language?
Being the best in the world to deal with a situation is a neutral statement. Putin is the best in the world to deal with the situation he’s in right now, if you need a negative angle on this.
Probably not true? It seems like Russia could use another Yeltsin (or Gorbachev) more than Putin for its current situation.