Live data from Hacker News

New models and developer products

openai.com

461–470 of 561 posts

Re: New models and developer products

#461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sorry, what breakthrough feature did we see here? - Code interpreter, function calling were already possible on any sufficiently advanced LLM that could follow instructions well enough to output tokens in a rigidly parseable format, which could then be fed into a parser, and its output fed back to the LLM. It was clunky to do with online APIs like ChatGPT, but still eminently possible. - Custom chatbots were easy…

You're completely ignoring image analysis.

sorry, missed that one, yeah, that's new as well, but to be fair, I missed it because nobody else was talking about it.

Re: New models and developer products

#462
post #453

If I had no contact with society from the 29th of November 2022 (the day before ChatGPT was released according to Wikipedia) and came back today to see the OpenAI keynote I would have lost my mind. The progress and usefulness of these products is absolutely incredible.

Does it boggle anyone else's mind that ChatGPT was released less than a year ago? It definitely feels like it was around lot longer than that.

And there's people (most people) who aren't using it

Re: New models and developer products

#463

Most of the products announced (and the price cuts) appear to be more about increasing lock-in to the OpenAI API platform, which is not surprising given increased competition in the space. The GPTs/GPT Agents and Assistants demos in particular showed that they are a black box within a black box within a black box that you can't port anywhere else. I'm mixed on the presentation and will need to read the fine print on…

What do you mean "orders of magnitude above" for DALL-E? As far as I can see, Midjourney is $0.05 per image, and that's if you don't forget you have a subscription. I've ended up paying $10 per image.

Re: New models and developer products

#464

128,000 token context, Assistants API, JSON mode, April 2023 knowledge cutoff, GPT 4 Turbo, lower pricing, custom GPTs, a good bunch of announcements all-round! https://openai.com/pricing

I thought GPT-4 had access to internet now?

Per the announcement, the "GPTs" do, natively.

I think everyone else had been hacking it on via "functions"

Re: New models and developer products

#465

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My open source ai coding tool aider is unique in that it is designed to work with existing code bases. You can jump into an existing git repo and start aaking for changes, new features, etc. https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider It helps gpt understand larger code bases by building a "repository map" based on analyzing the abstract syntax tree of all the code in the repo. This is all built using tree-sitter, the sam…

Related to the OpenAI announcement, I've been able to generate some preliminary code editing evaluations of the new GPT models. OpenAI is enforcing very low rate limits on the new GPT-4 model. I will update the results as quickly my rate limit allows. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38172621 Also, aider now supports these new models, including `gpt-4-1106-preview` with the massive 128k context window. https://gi…

I do love aider, thanks for making it! I'd like an option to stop it from writing files everywhere, though, even if that means I have no history.

Re: New models and developer products

#466

Whisper V3 is released! https://github.com/openai/whisper/commit/c5d42560760a05584c1... Looks like it's just a new checkpoint for the large model. It would be nice to have updates for the smaller models too. But it'll be easy to integrate with anything using Whisper V2. I'm excited to add it to my local voice AI ( https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/9NC624PBFGB7 ) I assume ChatGPT voice has been using Whisper V3 and…

Does it have diarisation yet?

Check out WhisperX

Re: New models and developer products

#467

With the assistant API, am I wrong or is it now much cheaper to actually use the API instead of the web Interface? $20 would cover a lot of interactions with the API, and since it’s now also doing truncation / history augmentation the API would have pretty much the same functionality. Thoughts?

Depends on how much you use it, but yes. I personally use TypingMind with the APIs

Re: New models and developer products

#468

This is kind of the wrong place for this, but given the burst of attention from LLM-loving people: is there any open source chat scaffolding that actually provides a good UI for organizing chat streams and doing stuff with them? A trivial example is how the LHS of the ChatGPT UI only allows you a handful of characters to name your chat, and you can't even drag the pane to the right to make it bigger; so I have all th…

Not sure if open source but check out TypingMind

Re: New models and developer products

#469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s insane because it makes no sense. When you read a book you don’t remember the last 100,000 words. It’s so wildly inefficient to do it that way.

Huh? By the time you finish reading a book you've forgotten the book?

The specific words, yes.

Re: New models and developer products

#470

With the assistant API, am I wrong or is it now much cheaper to actually use the API instead of the web Interface? $20 would cover a lot of interactions with the API, and since it’s now also doing truncation / history augmentation the API would have pretty much the same functionality. Thoughts?

Wasn't it always? I've been using a desktop app that talks to the API to access GPT-4, and I've been paying a dollar or two per month.
Post reply on HN