Live data from Hacker News

Using Goatse to Stop App Theft

joshcsimmons.com

461–464 of 464 posts

Re: Using Goatse to Stop App Theft

#461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

+1 - this is a childish move and bad business imo. I'd guess the author is pretty young.

Anyone today familiar with goatse is likely to be well into their thirties at least.

If you were on forums in the aughts, it was unavoidable. I think every very online millennial knows what Goatse is. The youngest millennial is 27. Which begs the question: is Goatse what spreads Zoomers and millennials apart?

Re: Using Goatse to Stop App Theft

#462
post #141

I am absolutely not a lawyer, but I wouldn't do something like this for fear of falling afoul of anti-obscenity laws. For instance, the UK has a cyberflashing law which allots a two year custodial sentence for sending a graphic image (by any means) with intent to cause distress.

I’m not a lawyer, but there are all kinds of extremely broad computer crime statutes on the books. No prosecutor would bring this case. This would flagrantly violate the spirit of the law, which was intended to stop unsolicited dick pics and other forms of targeted harassment. It would certainly not merit extradition to the UK, or the UAE for that matter.

It’s not worth worrying about such extreme what-if cases. If the Feds were so determined to destroy an innocent person in a kangaroo court, there’s easier ways of doing so. They could plant CSAM on the server. They could coerce an informant to accuse you of SA (like they did to Assange).

Realistically, the worst sanction this dev could reasonably expect, is to have their domain taken down. That’s what happened to the OG .cx domain, after all…

Re: Using Goatse to Stop App Theft

#463

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would the US extradite

The lack of extradition doesn't prevent the British courts from operating. It's not like you can escape punishment by just avoiding physically going to court. If you refuse to show up, you'll probably lose by default. How much impact that has depends on the relationship between the websites owners and the UK, but extradition isn't strictly necessary.

Look to the example of Russian intelligence officers being indicted by U.S. DOJ for an example that both proves and disproves your point. Governments do indict foreign nationals that can’t be extradited. They also don’t bother unless they’re a big enough fish to fry. Goatse doesn’t cut it. You have to do something like NotPetya to get a four-star cyber wanted level.

Re: Using Goatse to Stop App Theft

#464

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The isps can pretty easily set up a cache for things that are popular. There was a time when I worked for an ISP consultancy, where Netflix would literally give ISPs a prebuilt cache server iirc for free, and that was a win win for everyone. I shouldn’t be surprised that some shitty isp thinks it’s easier to hard link, but making a cache isn’t that hard.

A couple of years ago, the main submarine link connecting my country to the internet was damaged, and internet basically slowed to a crawl for a day. Could barely open anything. But Netflix was running at full HD with no problem. So they must have had local cache's with the ISPs.

this is how CDNs make their money. They replicate popular content close to the users. They generally do that WITHOUT giving anyone hardware, but by renting hardware in smaller areas, and setting up their own data centers in popular areas.

source: I used to work at Akamai (it was a while ago). The myriad things they do with their edge servers is pretty amazing, but for simple CDN stuff, most of the time clients aren't shipping hardware to isps. That being said, if Netflix can convince an isp to pay its electricity and hardware maintenance costs for a popular isp's customers that's going to pay for itself very quickly. So, i can see why Netflix offers this. It's just not normal AFAIK.

Post reply on HN