Live data from Hacker News

Rarbg Is No More

web.archive.org

461–470 of 679 posts

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the younger generation just uses streaming sites. FMovies and 9anime work fine. I don't know anyone who torrents shows or movies now.

Those who don't want to be dependent on the whims of a conglomerate and would like to actually possess the data files.

The "streaming" referred to here referred to pirate sites a la Fmovies or Couchtuner. They're not quite as front and center as they were before Google decided to be the Internet police but there's always foreign search engines to light the way.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've yet to see Google not return a piratebay link at any point in history. Is it a loophole where they take it down, but their indexer then immediately puts it back in the next pass, lol?

It's been 5 or 6 years ago now, but one night I searched for torrents for a particular movie, and Google returned hundreds of results from a dozen sites... and the next evening they returned 0. I think it was an October. While I don't doubt that a torrent link shows up once in awhile, Google no longer usefully searches for such things. Or really anything, legal or not. It's more like a purchase recommendation system…

Google used to rule the net. These days they're not even the best search engine for legal content, let alone overall net searching.

Bing and Yandex will get you most everything you want.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#463

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google has enough lawyers to give the EU and US the run around when they want to. For smaller players, they'd have to think really carefully about whether they want to engage in multi-year litigation with them.

> Google has enough lawyers to give the EU and US the run around when they want to. Google has paid something like 10 billions dollars of fines in the EU during the last decade. I don’t think they are giving the run around to anyone.

10 billion dollars is a rounding error for the GOOG.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#464
post #276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean like https://1984.hosting ? Or more like https://legittorrents.info , which shut down recently[1]? I had never heard of RARBG before, so I don't know if they were legitimate and you are being sarcastic or serious? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35639370

They were the website I torrented the entire Succession series.

Mate, you're being obnoxious.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#465
post #421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then Google should be prosecuted.

Google does not host it links, it's very different. Google does not store files it should not.

Well, they do, at Youtube. But they're pretty good about takedowns over there. Including of a ton of content that has no reason to be taken down.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#466
post #223
post #47

That's pretty devastating. This was old reliable for a long time. I could never keep up with the demands from private trackers as streaming made it so I didn't need to utilize them as much.

Are there any private torrent sites for movies/tv that you can buy your way in without needing a seedbox?

Checkout sonarr and radarr together with jackett. Plenty of ways to find zillions of sites. Most dark streaming sites use these tools to fully automate everything

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#467

I keep wondering all the time why torrent search is based on websites (centralized), which can be taken down, etc., while once you have a torrent file or a magnet/hash everything is distributed. Is there a main reason why there isn't (AFAIK, even though I haven't really researched) a distributed search that wouldn't have these problems? Is it a tech problem that literally can't be solved? Or it just hasn't been done?…

Decentralized search is a complex problem and there exist different approaches to it with different degree of centralization and resource requirements.

DC++ is a bit more decentralized than BitTorrent. There still are central servers ("hubs"), but they don't even host any metadata. Search works by the hub broadcasting all search queries to all online peers and them replying with results if they have any. The file transfers themselves are p2p.

I have an idea that's kind of more decentralized. Initially envisioned as a missing global search feature for the fediverse, but can be adapter for anything that has a similar network structure. A server has a number of peers already established because of the ActivityPub federation. Each server would send to its peers some kind of bloom filter that determines the tags or keywords that this server has results for. Then, when searching, your server would find the peers who are likely to have what you want, and only send your search query to them. If there aren't any, then it would send your query to the peers that have most users (with some random bias for load balancing purposes) because they're likely to have more connectivity, and they would point you where to look based on their own peers and their bloom filters. There would also need to be some kind of reputation system (centralized server lists? p2p exchange of scores/reports?) so that servers that return spam or intentionally wrong results would get punished.

This could probably be made to work in a fully-decentralized p2p network, but I imagine it would be too easy to abuse. Getting a new domain costs money, yet getting a new IP or public key is free and easy.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1 - Pirate bay still exists and is very much alive. 2 - Rarbg was a margin note in torrent community. There are others very much alive and better.

Please indicate which is better. Where can I click on "top 100" or similar, and instantly see a page full of recent releases with screenshots, synopsis, and comments one click away?

Rutracker is the best. You need to understand some russian. But everything is there.
Post reply on HN