Live data from Hacker News

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

engadget.com

461–470 of 550 posts

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#461

YouTube for the things I enjoy has improved dramatically because the comment section is vastly improved. Everyone used to use YouTube comments as an example of a comment section dumpster fire, but they fixed it. I've seen the recommendations get better then worse then better again as they tweaked the algorithms. Right now it's better than it's ever been. Again, for me. One complaint: I like to upload interesting clip…

D-

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#463

So much hate for her on all fronts, yet she made the most rewarding media platform today on the internet. Any creator or consumer who has half a brain should realize the magnitude of the feat and how unobvious it is that YouTube exists as it does today.

YouTube was an acquisition. Susan had zero input in its creation, she was working at Google at the time.

The yt of today and the yt of 2006 are very different services. If anything, Google bought a userbase and a brand name and built its own service from there.

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#464

So much hate for her on all fronts, yet she made the most rewarding media platform today on the internet. Any creator or consumer who has half a brain should realize the magnitude of the feat and how unobvious it is that YouTube exists as it does today.

>"yet she made the most rewarding media platform today on the internet." I think TikTok holds this position, not YouTube. Indeed, YouTube seems to be pushing really hard for Shorts to be a viable competitor but it doesn't seem to be working. Or, do you mean rewarding in terms of monetization for creators and not engagement?

By usage metrics, yt shorts are very successful. I don't think they've proven very easily monetizable yet though.

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#465
post #446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s no alternative (though Tik Tok certainly is doing a decent job of taking all the short content). I think it would be a gangbuster opportunity for Apple to integrate user created content into Apple TV. They don’t need to rely on ad revenue, and similar to Microsoft kneecapping Google with ChatGPT, it would be a great opportunity for Apple to further hurt Google by winning longer form video content and driving…

why is it apple's goal to "hurt Google"? With MSFT it's obvious that Satya is trying to distract a competitor in cloud, but chatgpt is hardly going to "kneecap" Google. Satya is hyping it with all the credibility of a used car salesman. There's zero evidence that LLMs are going to finally make Microsoft capable of launching a competitive search service.

> why is it apple's goal to "hurt Google"?

I can’t tell if you are trolling. Google develops Android which is the primary competitor to Apple’s biggest product. If Google loses revenue it weakens its ability to compete. This directly benefits Apple.

> With MSFT it's obvious that Satya is trying to distract a competitor in cloud, but chatgpt is hardly going to "kneecap" Google. Satya is hyping it with all the credibility of a used car salesman. There's zero evidence that LLMs are going to finally make Microsoft capable of launching a competitive search service.

All the reporting on this seems to be consistent that Google is freaked out about ChatGPT, rushed its announcement of Bard, etc etc. So I guess you could have the opinion that ChatGPT isn’t a threat, but I think it is obvious you would be in the minority. No one knows for sure of course, but the smart money, and Google itself, seem to think it is a major threat.

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#467
post #202

Positives: * Presided over a vast increase in revenue, from $4 to $29 billion * Steered the ship through a number of content controversies * Anecdotally, the brand value of YouTube remains good * YouTube Premium seems to have good uptake * Presided over enormous cost savings with custom encoder hardware * Few major technical outages, good streaming performance generally * Relationships with advertisers and content cr…

my user experience is pretty great. Any time I run into a video on a blog somewhere and realize it's hosted at yt, it's a huge relief to me. What video streaming service is more reliable or higher quality?

yt shorts are very successful. But regardless, I don't think that a CEO is unsuccessful any time innovation happens anywhere else in the world besides within their own company. That YT is a social media platform which has only become more relevant over the last 17 years is a pretty stunning track record. What other service has shown such longevity?

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#468
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YT search is dogshit now, rather than just returning results for the keyword you want they mix in random videos you've watched before and "suggested" videos that have no relation to the search and the lack of likes/dislikes makes it harder to determine quality, which is probably some dark pattern to try and drive more engagement by forcing people to watch multiple videos. Dark patterns work short term, long term they…

> YT search is dogshit now... All of Google search is dogshit these days. You can't search for anything these days without a crap ton of ads and pages of SEO optimized wrong answers.

s/Google search/the web

And people think chatgpt is going to save us, when all it's going to do is make the web, and therefore search results, ever more nonsensical.

Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down

#470

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's important where possible for people to pay for the premium version, while it provides ad free value for money, though I don't begrudge people blocking ads in other ways if they truly can't afford it. But I think it's short sighted and selfish to not pay for something like YouTube that you use and get value out of every day, when you can afford it. Either pay for it and support it or don't use it at all.

First, YouTube doesn't even offer Premium in my country. Second, the features of YouTube revanced apps also just simply surpasses official app for me anyway: - My phone has 1440p HDR display and YouTube official app just doesn't show me above 720p60 for 60fps videos while in the past it could. And it put me in an awkward situation: for under 60fps and for HDR 60fps videos, it can show up to 2160p and 2160p HDR 60 fps…

You bring up a good point, that out of all the video players that exist on mobile devices, YouTube's is pretty weak. Maybe it's part of Google's philosophy to keep their UX simple and dumb for the widest possible audience. And everyone else has to deal with it.
Post reply on HN