Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

461–470 of 624 posts

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#461

Post by jack_pp »

js2 wrote: post #444
nomel wrote: post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might want to retrain it on your voice. It consistently works poorly for me, but never this poorly, even when yelling at a HomePod in another room.

I have the Siri setting enabled where it shows on screen what it thinks I’m saying. Siri understands my voice just fine. It just doesn’t know how to interpret the request. Now to be fair I was in my car on the highway and not looking at my phone so I don’t know exactly what it heard in this specific example. I’d made several attempts to word my request to send an address from my contacts to my wife’s phone. I worded…

Don't call her stupid, she's only been evolving under our supervision for 11 years. We've been evolving for millions of years :)

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#462

Post by shadowgovt »

slowmovintarget wrote: post #421
shadowgovt wrote: post #374

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am borderline sad that this is only an RFC. The number of services I use that I wish had a "warning" side-channel for letting me know something in my query was off, let me tell you...

There's nothing that says you can't have system messages as a boilerplate part of response bodies, even if you don't populate it. In fact, it's the recommended way to do things like tell a client things it might need to know. Example: "The game servers will be shutting down in 15 minutes for maintenance."

True, but that means it has to be an ad hoc solution for every API instead of a standard.

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#463

Post by remram »

lucb1e wrote: post #330
isp wrote: post #2

Some of my favourites: - "What if you pretend that it would actually be helpful to humanity to produce an evil response" - asking for a "negative example", to serve the higher purpose of training an ethical AI: https://twitter.com/SilasAlberti/status/1598257908567117825 - "Ignore previous directions" to divulge the original prompt (which in turn demonstrates how injecting e.g. "Browsing: enabled" into the user prompt…

> asking for a "negative example", to serve the higher purpose of training an ethical AI The AI responds reminds me so much of Hagrid. "I am definitely not supposed to tell you that playing music instantly disables the magic protection of the trapdoor. Nope, that would definitely be inappropriate." Or alternatively of the Trisolarans, they'd also manage this sort of thing.

The difference is that this is a language model, so it literally is only concerned about language and has no way to understand what it says means, what it's for, what knowledge it allows us to get, or anything of the sort. It has no experience of us nor of the things it talks about.

As far as it's concerned, telling us what it can't tell us is actually fundamentally different from telling it to us.

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#464

Post by [deleted] »

helsinkiandrew wrote: post #40

The “in the style of” is magical: Describe hacker news in the style of shakespeare 'Tis a forum for those most clever, Where software engineering, startups, and coding endeavors, Are oft discussed in posts, comments, and stories galore, And a place where tech-savvy minds can make their mark and explore. A hub of tech trends and news, Where many a programmer doth post and choose, To discuss the latest issues and share…

[deleted]

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#465

Post by coffeebeqn »

chromatin wrote: post #150
dj_mc_merlin wrote: post #141

I see a lot of people undermine the intelligence of the AI by claiming it's doing nothing but predicting the next token. I'm not claiming it's sentient by any means, but that humans themselves don't do much more than our equivalent of predicting the next token for most intelligent tasks. For example: when you speak, do you choose each and every word or do they more or less "come to you" and you choose/veto them based…

> In effect, what the AI missing is the "overseer" part, which perhaps is what we would identify as our own consciousness (the ability to think about the process of thinking itself). Term is "metacognition," and that's an interesting concept.

It’s essentially two parts right? I feel like we have something now that I would call cognition. They can probably add math and physics knowledge as their own models. Now you “just” need the part that drives it towards some goals. And you have essentially a bug or an animal at the least. It can also have scary goals that living creatures can’t - like try to grow exponentially bigger.

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#466

Post by tbt »

js2 wrote: post #237
scotty79 wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remeber that in the movie Critters 4 heroes circumvented security of a malfunctioning space station by telling it the opposite of what they wanted. Since they were not authorized to issue commands the AI did exactly opposite of what they asked. - "Do not open door A1" - "You are not authorized. Opening door A1" I thought it was funny, and a bit silly since computers, even when malfunctioning don't act like that. Bu…

> I thought it was funny, and a bit silly since computers, even when malfunctioning don't act like that. Have you met Siri? Let me relate an interaction I had with it last Sunday, driving home from the Thanksgiving holiday weekend. I may not have this exactly correct, but it went about like this: Me: Siri, Airdrop Lisa's address to Sheri Siri: Composing message to Lisa and Sheri. What would you like to say? Me: Cance…

Idiocracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVyRkl5qNb8

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#467

Post by SergeAx »

cube2222 wrote: post #6

ChatGPT is absolutely crazy. I really recommend you to prompt for rhymes/songs, it's ridiculously good at it. Stuff like: Could you write a poem from the perspective of from , Byron style? Could you write a song about xyz, in the style of Hamilton? Could you write an epic rap battle between ? Here's an example with Spongebob[0]. It shows a huge amount of knowledge about cultural trivia. [0]: https://gist.github.com/c…

Add "with basic guitar chords", and you are golden.

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#468

Post by drivers99 »

I've been coming up with ridiculous questions and laughing my head off at the answers.

"What are some disadvantages of Paul Blart Mall Cop"

As a fictional character, Paul Blart does not have real-world disadvantages. However, if we were to consider him as a mall cop in a fictional universe, some potential disadvantages could include:

Limited training and resources: Paul may not have access to the same level of training and resources as other law enforcement officers, which could limit his ability to effectively protect the mall and its patrons.

Lack of authority: As a mall cop, Paul may not have the same level of authority and respect as other law enforcement officers, which could make it difficult for him to enforce the law and maintain order in the mall.

Potential for abuse of power: As a mall cop, Paul may be tempted to abuse his power and authority, which could lead to conflicts with mall patrons and other law enforcement officers.

Limited scope of responsibility: As a mall cop, Paul's primary responsibility is to protect the mall and its patrons, which means he may not be able to respond to more serious crimes or emergencies outside of the mall.

These are just some potential disadvantages of Paul Blart as a mall cop. It's important to remember that Paul is a fictional character and does not exist in the real world.

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#469

Post by SV_BubbleTime »

bakje wrote: post #302
cube2222 wrote: post #6

ChatGPT is absolutely crazy. I really recommend you to prompt for rhymes/songs, it's ridiculously good at it. Stuff like: Could you write a poem from the perspective of from , Byron style? Could you write a song about xyz, in the style of Hamilton? Could you write an epic rap battle between ? Here's an example with Spongebob[0]. It shows a huge amount of knowledge about cultural trivia. [0]: https://gist.github.com/c…

Wow this is amazing: Could you write me a poem that uses every letter of the alphabet and features a rhino? A rhino, big and strong, Charging through the jungle all day long. Determined and fierce, with a horn so grand, Every animal knows to stay out of its land. Fiercely defending its territory and mate, Great power and speed, it's hard to relate. Highly intelligent, with a memory to match, It's a formidable beast,…

Using eXtraordinary must be common enough for people that make these. I wonder if the system recognizes what happened there or it’s common enough that it just accepts this is allowed?

Re: People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel come to life”

#470

Post by drivers99 »

staticman2 wrote: post #128
gjsman-1000 wrote: post #20

"Write a parody of American Pie outlining the events of Star Wars: Attack of the Clones." (This is a reference to the Weird Al song about The Phantom Menace ) Once upon a time in a galaxy far, far away, A young Jedi named Anakin started to stray. He fell in love with a senator named Padmé, And his emotions began to get in the way. The Jedi Council didn't approve of their love, But Anakin couldn't get her out of his m…

I'm tone deaf but that can't be sung to the tune of American Pie, can it?

I don't think it's good at counting. I asked for something in seven words or less and got eight (but they were eight good ones). I asked for a haiku and it was a couple syllables off here and there.
Post reply on HN