Live data from Hacker News

Normalized crash data shows Autopilot is much less safe than Tesla claims

twitter.com

461–462 of 462 posts

Re: Normalized crash data shows Autopilot is much less safe than Tesla claims

#461
post #383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Both trains and planes centralise assets, services and pathways, allowing for rent seeking and anti competitive behaviour, government and regulatory capture, and by their very nature are anti consumer and pro big business. Hence their dominance and the increasing pressure on self driving EVs.

But cars need infrastructure (roads) which tend to create the same exact thing (big construction corps getting all the cake, thanks to political connections). The scale is for sure smaller but still...

... the scale is smaller

Re: Normalized crash data shows Autopilot is much less safe than Tesla claims

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On a public road I almost always come to a full stop, and if I don't I recognize it as an error. That's the law and there are very good reasons for it. It's an unambiguous standard of performance, for example. Arguments for rolling stops based on personal utility are selfish, IMHO, and arguments pleading utility to others are disingenuous--the rolling stoppers say that it's safer to rolling stop because of the rollin…

One thing that pops up into mind - I wonder if there's a difference between drivers of automatic vs manual gear shifts in propensity for rolling stops.

I don't know. I drive standard. Maybe part of the reason I always stop is because I love a well-executed launch. :-)
Post reply on HN