WFH works OK, but the majority of staff needs to be WFH. When it's the other way around, I find it just becomes a political nightmare. Office workers band together and it's rather trivial for them to sideline WFH. (eg, lunch / hallway / watercool, etc) Also, it takes awhile for the DNA of company to become WFH. Just sending office drones home rarely works. Ideally it would start out WFH. Likely these big time ceos th…
> Office workers band together and it's rather trivial for them to sideline WFH. (eg, lunch / hallway / watercool, etc) What? I mean it is way easier to sideline in a WFH environment. Just send a mail, DM or do a call. WFH does not solve sidelining if that is a problem.
Where WFH is superior is a much broader labor pool to pull upon as well as reducing the astronomical amounts of time wastage than can occur in commuting.
Also, WFH really benefits companies building distributed projects. I always find it hilarious how people who do this in office don't actually use their own products.