Live data from Hacker News

Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

cnbc.com

461–470 of 489 posts

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#461
post #355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While it is not explicitly illegal, you are most definitely violating your employment agreement so your employer will fire you if they find out and might sue you as well. The problem is really that multiple parties may be able to claim the rights to all of your output while you were on their payroll, which is obviously messy from a legal standpoint.

But, as he said, he does not have any output at all.

This is the way

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#462
post #75

I currently have 10 fully remote engineering jobs. The bar is so low, oversight is non-existent, and everyone is so forgiving for under performance I can coast about 4-8 weeks before a given job fires me. Currently on a $1.5M run-rate for comp this year. And the interviewing process is so much faster today, companies are desperate, it takes me 2-3hrs of total effort to land a new job with thousands to chose from.

Dude, you're my hero, I'm currently at 3 jobs at once (used to be 4 but the contract ended) and this is 100% true, I like some jobs more than others and it really boosts up income and learning, can you share more secrets? It's been a hell of a ride for me

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#463
post #75

I currently have 10 fully remote engineering jobs. The bar is so low, oversight is non-existent, and everyone is so forgiving for under performance I can coast about 4-8 weeks before a given job fires me. Currently on a $1.5M run-rate for comp this year. And the interviewing process is so much faster today, companies are desperate, it takes me 2-3hrs of total effort to land a new job with thousands to chose from.

you might want to check out this guy, with the kvm and offshore servicing, https://lateralwork.com/ . 20 remote jobs - next goal

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#464

I've been back in my company's office in person (medium-sized tech company) for the last week with a small subset of employees before we all go back, and I've become pretty convinced that these hybrid models will not go well. Even while wearing masks and social distancing, I feel far more connected to the others that work in the office, and whether it's fair or not, personal connection and trust play a huge role in c…

I am still remote but I think you are spot on.

I hate the office but I will be back in as many days as possible as soon as possible. I am not going to be part of an out-group to an in-group that contains the people who decide promotions.

I have no doubt the people who come back to the office the quickest and the most often will get better raises over the next few years on average vs THOSE remote people.

The dynamics here are pretty much face up.

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#465
post #75

I currently have 10 fully remote engineering jobs. The bar is so low, oversight is non-existent, and everyone is so forgiving for under performance I can coast about 4-8 weeks before a given job fires me. Currently on a $1.5M run-rate for comp this year. And the interviewing process is so much faster today, companies are desperate, it takes me 2-3hrs of total effort to land a new job with thousands to chose from.

This thread is being laughed at on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/ctrlshifti/status/1402876173680472065?s=...

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#466
post #155
post #75

I currently have 10 fully remote engineering jobs. The bar is so low, oversight is non-existent, and everyone is so forgiving for under performance I can coast about 4-8 weeks before a given job fires me. Currently on a $1.5M run-rate for comp this year. And the interviewing process is so much faster today, companies are desperate, it takes me 2-3hrs of total effort to land a new job with thousands to chose from.

Too bad you can write only one of those positions on your resume.

I'm going to let you in on a little secret: You can write absolutely anything you want on your resume.

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#467
post #75

I currently have 10 fully remote engineering jobs. The bar is so low, oversight is non-existent, and everyone is so forgiving for under performance I can coast about 4-8 weeks before a given job fires me. Currently on a $1.5M run-rate for comp this year. And the interviewing process is so much faster today, companies are desperate, it takes me 2-3hrs of total effort to land a new job with thousands to chose from.

Where do we look for these remote jobs. any specific websites to checkout the openings?

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#468
post #75

I currently have 10 fully remote engineering jobs. The bar is so low, oversight is non-existent, and everyone is so forgiving for under performance I can coast about 4-8 weeks before a given job fires me. Currently on a $1.5M run-rate for comp this year. And the interviewing process is so much faster today, companies are desperate, it takes me 2-3hrs of total effort to land a new job with thousands to chose from.

Wow you really do sound serious. I have done ghost development for 2 jobs before, as in I took the job and had juniors help me out although I was doing majority of the work. Never thought of 10 jobs.

This seems way better for me to set my own funds straight than chasing investors for my product ideas. I do not think I can pull off the work needed though...

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#469
post #241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much work are you doing at these 10 companies? Are you writing code or just literally doing nothing?

Yes writing code, I provide enough actual progress that people must assume I'm either extremely methodical or woefully incompetent. I put in about an hour per job per day. I'm logged-in on slack/teams/etc and disable idle indicators. I use a virtual KVM to switch between laptops as needed. The biggest problem I run into is video meetings occurring at the same time, those I usually just disable video and blame it on i…

[deleted]

Re: Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

#470
post #241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much work are you doing at these 10 companies? Are you writing code or just literally doing nothing?

Yes writing code, I provide enough actual progress that people must assume I'm either extremely methodical or woefully incompetent. I put in about an hour per job per day. I'm logged-in on slack/teams/etc and disable idle indicators. I use a virtual KVM to switch between laptops as needed. The biggest problem I run into is video meetings occurring at the same time, those I usually just disable video and blame it on i…

I'm one of those mythical 10x developers, too.

Last year, I had a company beg me to start working with them, and I talked them up from $120,000 ($60/hour) of my current gig with a huge corp to $150,000 ($75/hour). I just never gave my notice at corp 1. I did so well at both, and both of my team leads and bosses said I was doing great.

So at the beginning of the year, I added another company, this time, another publicly traded corp @ a 52w high, but they didn't have anyone who had my skills so I was a Team of 1 and I would tell them something would take a month but it'd take 1-3 days. I'd spend about an hour on that job, a week, and everyone was happy. I'd just steadily drip drip drip commits I worked on, on say Monday, through the week and update the issue tracker. Maybe 20 minutes a day.

I was still playing 4-5 hours of video games, a day, and still finishing all of my work by noon, so I took a 4th job, and it pays the least and requires the most work, so I'm going to quit it in about 2 more sprints or so.

That took me down to ~2-3 hours of slacking off a day, but my meetings started seriously overlapping in the mornings, but I've got that figured out.

So today was weird. I did first interview at another company (#5) and the CEO came on the call and said I was hired immediately. Team of 1. No oversight. ($65/hour)

Early this morning, I got a call saying "The client wants to interview and hire you TODAY, if possible". So I interview with them. Huge corporation, corp-2-corp, $80/hour 1099. They interviewed me on the spot and rushed me an offer, gave me a $2000 hiring bonus if i could only give 1 week notice. Team of 1, no oversight. The stuff is easily automated.

Oh, I fully automated Job #2 and do in ~30 minutes what would have taken me about 3-4 hours by hand. That took me about 3 months to automate.

So just when i thought it was already nuts, a recruiter I had completely forgotten about called me up and said the client from 3 weeks ago had extended an offer for $80/hour, so that's job #7.

I added it up... That's $225/hour in just job offers I received and accepted today. That's $450,000/year if I can sustain it (highly doubtful!) and by July 15, if I can manage, that's $485/hour or roughly $970,000/year....

So take $970,000 / 52 = That's $18,654 per week... $37,307 per paycheck or $80,833 per month....

That's big boy money.

So far, all the corporations use sprints. In all but one (the cheapest paid) i'm more than fulfilling my work. I'm currently working about 6 hours a day but when I'm in startup mode, I consistently coded for 15+ hours/day, 6 days a week.

I've been making $255/hour for several months now... That's like $27,000/month after tax. I am saving entire paychecks from corps just to pay the IRS every quarter. I realized if I opened up an S-Corp and did corp to corp and paid myself a reasonable salary of $120,000/year, i'd save many tens of thousands, so now every new gig is nothing but corp-2-corp.

Funny thing? I'm working less intensely than when I was investing my heart and soul into a single project for way less than $150,000/year.

Post reply on HN