Live data from Hacker News

YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

theverge.com

461–466 of 466 posts

Re: YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

#461
I'm 31 and I find this totally insane! Why would you pay $65/mo for something that has 8 minutes of commercial for every 22 minutes of content? Regular TV is dead to me now that we have streaming services. I'll pay for the content, but don't waste my time trying to make more money by showing me ads. I haven't had a regular TV connection since leaving for college.

Re: YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A road warrior VPN setup running on a Raspberry Pi 4 and placed in your home costs less than $50. There are 1000 reasons to have one anyway, and watching TV while traveling is also one of them. I know for a fact the Spectrum TV app works quite well under this setup.

I see you commented below that you used OpenVPN for implementing this. I tried using a self-hosted Squid proxy with the Spectrum website, but was unsuccessful at getting it to work. I also tried routing the traffic over SOCKS5 (using ssh -D) and it still didn't work. This was a while ago, but I recall that the website was using Flash. I'm just assuming that the website was using Flash to do some local network checkin…

Routing through where? If you put your proxy in the cloud then it definitely won't work as most providers block known cloud host IPs like AWS, Digital Ocean, etc. I placed my Raspberry Pi inside my home network so that when I'm traveling my traffic still appears to be coming from my home, which is what Spectrum and others are looking for to determine whether to show you the entire channel listing or just a small slice of available channels. If you're not showing a residential IP in their network then it doesn't matter what setup you use, it still won't work.

Re: YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

#463

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see you commented below that you used OpenVPN for implementing this. I tried using a self-hosted Squid proxy with the Spectrum website, but was unsuccessful at getting it to work. I also tried routing the traffic over SOCKS5 (using ssh -D) and it still didn't work. This was a while ago, but I recall that the website was using Flash. I'm just assuming that the website was using Flash to do some local network checkin…

Routing through where? If you put your proxy in the cloud then it definitely won't work as most providers block known cloud host IPs like AWS, Digital Ocean, etc. I placed my Raspberry Pi inside my home network so that when I'm traveling my traffic still appears to be coming from my home, which is what Spectrum and others are looking for to determine whether to show you the entire channel listing or just a small slic…

Uh yeah, sorry I didn't specify that I meant at my house, also on a raspberry pi as well FWIW.

Re: YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

#464

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Not all ads can be fully skipped, and skipping the ad takes at least a couple of seconds. You can also get multiple ads in a video. You're not watching them right. All ads can be fully skipped, preemptively, at a time cost of zero. If you don't like the ads, just don't watch them. There's no reason to pay for YouTube Red.

Not watching them involves waiting a few seconds for the skip ad button to appear. That time adds up to 30 to 60 min a month. Let's say 45 min a month in average. That means, saving 45 min of my spare time costs $12, the cost of YouTube Red. 45 min of my spare time is much more valuable than $12, so I just pay for it.

> Not watching them involves waiting a few seconds for the skip ad button to appear.

You're hallucinating. Just read the sidethread comment from tpm:

> I have never seen an ad on Youtube, much less an unskippable one.

Re: YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

#465

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now they're doing the exact thing that drove everyone away from their cable company to them in the first place. It's clear misunderstanding of their customers. I'm sure most of the HN demographic would have no real trouble affording this 30% rate hike, but it's not about the actual money, it's about the principle.

They're also no longer price-competitive with traditional cable TV, which many people rely on as their only source of wired Internet. When it costs $60/mo for Internet, and only another $40/mo to bundle cable TV, why would I spend $25 extra for YouTube TV instead? The unlimited DVR is nice, but most cable providers also offer some DVR functionality and tons of on-demand content. They also increasingly offer streaming…

Yes! I noticed the next time I launched the YouTube TV app they added a screen I've never seen before where it reminded me how much value they were providing (basically the DVR) and showed me a list of shows to add to my unlimited DVR.

I agree the "unlimited" DVR is nice but even then it's not truly unlimited and it doesn't give me the part of unlimited that I'm interested in. I don't need unlimited shows saved for a year, I want to save a few things until I get to them or the odd rare special thing I want to save forever.

Re: YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99

#466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

America has a lot of problems, but they all look strangely like anti-trust: https://mattstoller.substack.com/

What about obesity?

Large chains pushing cheap, processed crap food in food deserts that the poor are trapped in?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_desert https://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/60/11/2667

Post reply on HN