Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a physical device (ie featured-locked upon shipping), “support” amounts to paying the server bill, which is likely negligible.
Would be great if you could use your own server, and that the server code was open.
Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
461–470 of 478 posts
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#462Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a physical device (ie featured-locked upon shipping), “support” amounts to paying the server bill, which is likely negligible.
Would be great if you could use your own server, and that the server code was open.
Open source server which runs locally. The hardware is long since discontinued (but plentiful and easily available on craigslist etc) and it can never be obsoleted as everything runs locally.
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#463Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You buy a product, but still don't own it, and have to keep your subscription going so the seller don't remotely brick your device. That’s absolutely not what’s happening here. I paid £169 for my Play:1 five years ago, and it’s still working as well as the day I bought it. I haven’t paid them a penny since. This eco trade in may be a bit sketchy but absolutely no one’s device is being bricked without their consent.
Sure, today. But what happens when Sonos decides they "don't want to support your Play:1"? Maybe because it's a "security issue" and they place your Play:1 in "recycle" mode for you and give you so many months to replace it? Think about this from a longer term point of view - this is just an A/B test by Sonos. They can brick your device from remote, so there's no guarantee that at some point they won't.
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#464Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please stop using word "recycling" in the wrong way. Sonos used this word purposefully to promote the deactivation of their devices, which has nothing to do with real recycling: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/recycle
It's not clear to me from that link what my error is. Would you be willing to expand? The commonly used definition of recycling I've heard is the first one listed on the linked page: "to process (something, such as liquid body waste, glass, or cans) in order to regain material for human use." That's why the phrase is "reduce, reuse, recycle", right? Yes, technically you could say reuse is a form of recycling, but we…
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#465Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apparently you can still wipe and reset and reinstall the phones even with "OEM unlock" switched off. At least, we managed to pull it off. But it took about half a day of trying and retrying random things from threads on forum.xda-developers.com. Sorry I can't be more specific, it becomes a bit of a blur after the 5th time :-p
If you do a reset from recovery and not the settings app it locks it down with android factory reset protection and the phone is bricked until the original owner enters their google password.
Still stupid that it can brick the phone if you don't have that password.
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#466Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, today. But what happens when Sonos decides they "don't want to support your Play:1"? Maybe because it's a "security issue" and they place your Play:1 in "recycle" mode for you and give you so many months to replace it? Think about this from a longer term point of view - this is just an A/B test by Sonos. They can brick your device from remote, so there's no guarantee that at some point they won't.
Sonos has never EOL'ed or feature handicapped a speaker yet. It doesn't seem like something they're keen to do.
[0] https://www.techradar.com/news/sonos-finally-kills-off-cr100...
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#467Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can get a number of small amps these days that will plug into the speakers and sound great. Many will also support Bluetooth so you can stream to your stereo.
Do you have a link to these small in-speaker housing amps?
Several companies make all-in-one bluetooth speakers that have amps built in, but they tend to be lower quality in my experience.
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#468Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can get a number of small amps these days that will plug into the speakers and sound great. Many will also support Bluetooth so you can stream to your stereo.
Bluetooth is the biggest joke foisted on audio. Even at its best there is mandated compression, which means the highest quality signal will be mashed into a lowest common denominator piece of garbage.
Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#469Re: Sonos's “recycle mode” intentionally bricks devices so they can't be reused
#470Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely! I have a 1999 Sony amp and some older (1980s) Wharfedale speakers. Nothing I've bought in the last 25 years sounds remotely as good as them. And plugging in a Chromecast audio has given it immortality.
What's the current best alternative to a Chromecast Audio, now that they're discontinued and no longer as readily available? My current living room setup is a Chromecast Audio connected to an AVR via the optical out connection, which powers my speakers, but I'm curious if there's any alternatives. The eBay sellers are really starting to price-gouge, and I'm not naive enough to believe that my Chromecast Audio will la…