Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are so right on all your comments. Soon we'll be re-doing the entire site. Perhaps we can talk in several weeks?
I'd add that framing the hiring decision as charity ("giving someone a second chance") could be improved. I'd go for more of a "diamond in the rough" angle. "Find talent everyone else is missing."
Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
461–470 of 541 posts
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#462One minor suggestion: review the assets on your website, the second background image[0] for example is 12 megabytes, you can probably compress it to much smaller size.
[0] https://jobboardhq.blob.core.windows.net/assets/prod/2ttp/sh...
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#463Earlier quoted context omitted.
Presumably your definition of white is the convenient one that includes Asian people, right? Tech hiring has jack all to do with racism when the big companies are matching the ratios coming out of uni with CS degrees.
That was James Baldwin speaking. I figured he had enough gravitas to present an idea, but even James Baldwin gets pushback on hacker news!
If you have a substantive point to make, make it thoughtfully; otherwise please don't comment until you do.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#464Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right you are. The US has 5% of the world's population, and 25% of the world's incarcerated population. Per capita, more than China, Iran, N Korea.
In fact they're not right. The parent is confusing criminal record with incarceration duration. The UK has nearly just as high of a criminal record ratio among adult men for example. The difference is the US assigns far longer incarceration times for the same crime vs the UK. Further, Europe as a whole has a higher crime rate than the US does. [1] 70 million jobs has plenty of room for international expansion accordi…
Keep in mind that the exploding US prison population started in the 1990s; 'thirty years ago' is before this happened.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#465Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its a listing that excludes candidates with felonies on a job board specifically for candidates with felonies.
The OP specifies only "criminal record", which may include both misdemeanors and felonies, with varying degrees of each. Some employers care about any criminal record at all, while others care about felony convictions only. The website itself only mentions "criminal record" and "formerly incarcerated". Perhaps it would be prudent to make filtering easy for "misdemeanors only" jobs and "former felons wanted" jobs?
It made my 1.5Lb sale of marijuana (felony) not seem so harmful.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#466Former career criminal here. Spent 19 years of my adult life in a combination of jail and prison. Longest stint was for 14 consecutive years. Been working in IT for the last 17 years, mostly as a developer. Had a very hard time getting my foot in the door; was denied employment more than once because of my record. Not sure that my current employer is even aware that I have a record, and to be honest I have no plans t…
I really love that you shared your story.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#467Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Also: I did not suggest a man call himself a homemaker. So, I am not sure what the point of your comment is. Uh, I'm not sure where this hostility is coming from. Just because someone responds to your comment doesn't mean they're disagreeing with you. I was just adding the context for anyone who sees your comment and interprets it narrowly as thinking that putting 'homemaker' on their resume gap is a useful way to…
I don't see why you are calling that hostility. You could have made the point you made here without implying I was suggesting that some man should go with that framing. I am quite open about my gender. Lots of people recognize that I am female. Those that don't can easily determine my gender by clicking into my profile. I have zero reason to believe people will interpret my remark to mean that men should call themsel…
Claiming that "I don't see the point of your comment" isn't hostile is just disingenuous.
> You could have made the point you made here without implying I was suggesting that some man should go with that framing.
> I have zero reason to believe people will interpret my remark to mean that men should call themselves homemakers.
No such implication was made. I liked your comment and was adding context that I thought was relevant. I also didn't claim that you were hiding your gender? I don't check everyone's profile on the off chance that it has the relevant information about them that I'm about to ask them. If you're not mature enough to handle someone _agreeing with_ and trying to expand on your comment without imagining yourself under attack by implications you pulled out of thin air, this conversation is a waste of both of our time.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#468Richard, another thought I had: There is a tax break for businesses that hire a new parolee. Something like $4-5k tax credit for the first year of employment. Would be good to find out about that and let employers know - help encourage them to hire criminals.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#469Richard, a suggestion: Have a way for parole/probation officers to search for jobs nearby for their charges. My PO was actually a helpful guy, as he figured if I was working, I was more likely to stay out of trouble. Just have some way for them to engage and provide assistance to new parolees.
Re: Launch HN: 70MillionJobs (YC S17) – Job board for people with criminal records
#470Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are so right on all your comments. Soon we'll be re-doing the entire site. Perhaps we can talk in several weeks?
Also, please reconsider your decision to feature Google and Facebook as prominently as "featured employers". If it's for security, maintenance, and janitorial work, it's more practical to list the agencies that they hire temps from. Otherwise, look no further than nearby East Palo Alto and one will find that neither company particularly cares about rehabilitating ex-offenders or people from at-risk communities for an…