Live data from Hacker News

Magic+

getmagicnow.com

461–470 of 498 posts

Re: Magic+

#461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? A personal assistant is someone that you know, that you vet, that you can gauge the skills and reliability of, and that you can hold genuinely accountable. And you are comparing hiring this person on a full time basis to an ad hoc and in many cases inferior "assistant" who is only available for a fraction of that time with no guarantee or indication of quality ahead of time. And not just that, but only extremel…

You completely hit the hammer on the head with both this comment and the parent. I just assume that a big amount of 20-25-ish developers here that make $180.000 are excited at the prospect of having a personal assistant to match their other unreasonable status enhancing purchases. As if any 'rich person' would spend any amount of time texting some random employee and give them access to his e-mails. If I were rich an…

> You completely hit the hammer on the head

http://dannybaranowski.blogspot.hu/2012/06/idioms-for-idiots...

Re: Magic+

#462
Interesting discussion, but I would postulate that people on HN are typically the ones who wouldn't appreciate - or even understand - such a service. Also, if you are fixated on the details, e.g. "do I need this to reserve a flight today" then you will certainly not get it. You could alternatively think about the big picture, i.e. removing all the limitations and bottlenecks of a personal assistant, and also scaling it up.

Re: Magic+

#463

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He's not going to hire Magic+ for 40 hours per week. Many services are $100/hr or more, they're just rarely billed out that way, because people have this reaction. If you have a moderate amount of disposable income, you can afford to have simple requests filled by Magic+ for $15-$30 (10-20 minutes of personal assistant time) several times a month. The viability of the product for a solid middle class user really just…

> If you have a moderate amount of disposable income, you can afford to have simple requests filled by Magic+ for $15-$30 (10-20 minutes of personal assistant time) several times a month. Well, except that--as the grandparent post said--the minimum buy is $1000 for 10 hours. That puts it well outside "casual purchase, might come in handy" and into "must have a specific, long-term use in mind" for the typical middle-c…

You're right. I missed the comment about a minimum buy-in. That definitely puts it outside of the reach of someone who may find it useful for simple, occasional tasks. I guess they still want those people to use standard Magic.

Re: Magic+

#464

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Obviously the $100/hr price point puts it out of reach for most people $100/hr for competent assistants 24/7/anywhere is a steal for any kind of organization like investment banks, enterprise sales, consulting firms, that send their people into the field to do high pressure, deadline-driven work.

Anything work related will be subject to confidentiality and is therefore utterly useless for all the examples you give.

Another potential revenue generator for Magic, partner with large organisations so they can offer the service to their employees. If the global corporation where I work can trust files of thousands of employees to a third party cloud sync service, I'm sure this can be done.

Re: Magic+

#465
post #376
post #352

I'm trying to figure out why I (too) am having a strong negative reaction to this. Let me think out loud: I'm fortunate enough to have a real personal assistant. She's amazing, she knows me, she does fantastic work, and I pay her a fair and reasonable wage (including health care) that's far less than $100/hour. So let's put me in the category of "people who can afford a personal assistant" but not quite in the catego…

Just curious, but what is your line of work and that of your friends with assistants?

I work in tech (but started and sold several companies previously). Of the first three friends who have assistants that come to mind: two are CEOs and one runs a hedge fund. I guess no surprises :)

Re: Magic+

#466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Obviously the $100/hr price point puts it out of reach for most people $100/hr for competent assistants 24/7/anywhere is a steal for any kind of organization like investment banks, enterprise sales, consulting firms, that send their people into the field to do high pressure, deadline-driven work.

Anything work related will be subject to confidentiality and is therefore utterly useless for all the examples you give.

last minute accommodations, car rentals, plane tickets, restaurant reservations, location scouting, ballroom rentals, all these things can be outsourced.

companies are already paying amex, travel agencies, and junior associates for this kind of thing. not to mention actual assistants that make 75k+

Re: Magic+

#467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a decent amount of innovation that can make the assistants more efficient, so you can improve profitability without driving down wages. But there's also something else: Since a high percentage of services will likely end in a transaction, there's a huge opportunity to become the Amazon-scale retailer of services. I find I don't even google products I want to buy anymore, I just immediately search Amazon. Amaz…

Personally, Amazon's UI has a long way to go and doesn't look like it's going to get better anytime soon. If you know what you're looking for, it's fine, but as soon as you try to comparison shop it falls apart fairly quickly. I've gotten into the habit of looking for experts on other sites that do hands-on comparisons for the thing I want to buy (some recent examples: rain jackets and fitness meters). Amazon is hone…

So, if the market shows that UI is what causes Amazon dearly, and that the market prefers a magic like messaging interface, how long will it take for Amazon to offer a magic like service at a price point that is affordable to everyone. Compare that with the time and effort required for Magic to become a retailer with Amazon's efficiency. I'll bet on the former.

Re: Magic+

#468
And how can we guarantee that people behind magic+ don't get any conflict of interest ?

Let say, for example, that i need a cab to move me from airport to the hotel with a bike to make the thing more complicated for a lambda traveler. How can I know in advance how much I will have to pay ? that the deal is decent ? that the guy will actually come ?

I understand that they target rich people but I imagine one does not simply want to pay 200% more than usually a helicopter ride...

Re: Magic+

#469
post #468

And how can we guarantee that people behind magic+ don't get any conflict of interest ? Let say, for example, that i need a cab to move me from airport to the hotel with a bike to make the thing more complicated for a lambda traveler. How can I know in advance how much I will have to pay ? that the deal is decent ? that the guy will actually come ? I understand that they target rich people but I imagine one does not…

Presumably they make their money from repeat customers, in which case ripping off their customers is probably not an optimal strategy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repeated_game

Re: Magic+

#470

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything work related will be subject to confidentiality and is therefore utterly useless for all the examples you give.

Another potential revenue generator for Magic, partner with large organisations so they can offer the service to their employees. If the global corporation where I work can trust files of thousands of employees to a third party cloud sync service, I'm sure this can be done.

I really think this is entering into the land of pure fantasy.
Post reply on HN