Live data from Hacker News

Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

research.meta.ai

451–460 of 682 posts

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#451

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So - presumably you have another site in mind that is better. I'd be intrigued to know which one you would recommend.

Sounds like something a bot would say!

Which reply? Because both seem like nothing a bot would say honestly.

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#452
post #433

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So - presumably you have another site in mind that is better. I'd be intrigued to know which one you would recommend.

You gotta touch grass and talk to people irl

I asked my barista what they think about Qwen 3.8 Max…

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#453

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would love to see any good research projects about it but i have the feeling that Frontier with MoE is making too fast of a progress so that a customized model would always be worse and that the MoE part is actually going somehow in this direction. On the other hand, at the GTC was a talk about coding in different lanugage (like spanish) and explaining that the quality between spanish and english is relevant differ…

Capability in LLM's is distributed throughout the manifold in subspaces. Even worse, the subspaces exist in superposition. That is to say, there is no single 'python' part of the model. The python bit is spread throughout the entire model and overlaps with other pieces that have similar, but unrelated, capabilities. For example the python subpspace might be partially in superposition with cupcake recipes, Esperanto,…

I mean the only way to separate them would be to separate them at training would it not? If there is zero python in the training set, then you have a smaller training set, should be able to have fewer weights in the model

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#454

Meta is rocking AI. As of last week I have been using their excellent muse coding harness with their model Muse Spark 1.2. Starting this morning I am running their new local 30B model muse-glimmer on my old MacMini 32G using Ollama (remember to increase the context size!) and pi coding harness. I am getting good results with muse-glimmer running locally, with the caveat that everything runs slowly (e.g., give it a ta…

Friends Don't Let Friends Use Ollama https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788385

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#455
PSA: Fast RAM isn't going to be getting cheaper anytime soon. Acquiring inference hardware is a really good way to own an appreciating hard asset. Learning how to use it and cool it is a hacker's journey worth taking. My 4090 I bought in late 2022 for $1600 is selling for a cool $3,489.95 right now, and going strong under nominal use. My DRR5 has tripled in value, my nvmes almost doubled. I grabbed a 128GB M5 Max MacBook Pro when they were still available and told all my friends to buy at least one. With that and a base M4 Studio 36GB, HuggingFace rates that hardware as:

> Amazing! You have a total of 128.94 TFLOPS of computing power. 71.3% percentile on scale of "GPU Poor" to "GPU Rich"

The way I see it, these are amazing machines that the richest folks are hovering up. I think they should be in the hands of regular people as much as possible. They depend on an incredibly global, increasingly fragile supply chain. If the become impossible to produce, their value would increase tremendously. I think they will become really valuable to you to use the tokens directly, but if that isn't the case, they can be rented out or resold. Please don't just buy any hold. Let's try to get as many people that can use them for decent things that help humans. For example:

https://spectrum.ieee.org/small-language-models-ai-pharmaceu...

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#457

Still needs 32-64GB memory to run it locally. 64GB Macbook pro with an M5 chip costs more than 4k Euros in Germany. A more practical model would be a language specific (e.g Python or JVM language) and excellent at tool calling and reasoning. Maybe that way they can shrink it even more.

Coming from the PC games industry in the 90s and early 2000s, it was a struggle to run some of the games on release. 90%* of people wouldn't be able to play the AAA games on release (think Crysis, etc). This period of local LLMs reminds me of that time, whereby the hardware just isn't there yet. Give it time, and the prices will drop. * total guess

Assuming we can even get the hardware in the first place, it might not even be possible for consumers to buy it at any price if it sells out through "agreements" made years in advance https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47045459

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#458

Some interesting findings from the chat template designs: 1. The template name is Onyx ATEM as found in the tool call exception message 2. It appears to be following a harmony-style chat template. But the tool use seems to be a xml like : / / 3. atem: a internal joke of meta in reverse? https://huggingface.co/meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B/blob/mai...

> atem

also perhaps taking some small joy from the lexical similarity to aten[0] namespace that lies at the heart of pytorch

[0]: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/aten/src/README...

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#459
post #294

Remember when we needed 200 servers for an enterprise website because Apache used one process or thread per connection - and Nginx collapsed that into a single box overnight? That moment for LLMs is near. It’s going to move us from the big iron era of AI to small portable brains. Nature has already proved it’s possible with 20 watts and very little heat generation. And I think the data center buildout will end in car…

brains do it with 20 watts because theyre analog. llms require massive amounts of power and this isnt changing any time soon without a breakthrough

There are arguments that the brain is quantum, as in parts of it locally using quantum effects. Which if true, might make a counter-argument, as there will be bigger data centers needed if the goal is to simulate the brain classically.

On the other side, advancement in quantum computers would make current LLM inference much faster. Because of the extreme cooling needed, i dont think the energy demand would become less.

With AI companies talking about AGI, i sometimes wonder if they really need the machines for serving inference to customers, or they have a formula for computational capacity that could run an AGI, and they just want to reach that level.

Re: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows

#460
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I kick myself a couple times a week for not getting the 512GB Mac Studio in February. I was holding out for an M4 or M5 chip...

I was about a week away from buying a very tricked out MacBook Pro with 128 GB RAM, but was on vacation and worried about it arriving while I was away, and then the price hikes went into effect. Grumble. Oh, well. Serves me right.

https://www.ign.com/articles/ramageddon-continues-another-ye...

The best time to plant a tree…

Post reply on HN