Live data from Hacker News

YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

blog.youtube

451–460 of 881 posts

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#451
post #281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rather than genuinely enjoying a well-made/actually entertaining AI content, people are just gonna blindly hate on anything AI-generated.

Until AI companies pay for all the content that they stole, I think that is a reasonable response.

AceStep XL is a music generation model trained on an open dataset. is the content generated with that one okay with you then?

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend of mine who is a very non-technical dermatologist listens exclusively to Suno songs she made. All in genres and styles of songs from her era, the 80s and 90s. Who else is going to make new songs for her? New music almost always targets young people.

There is plenty of artists making music analogous to 80's and 90's classics. Not to mention millions of 80's and 90's songs she's never heard. I constantly find myself discovering new 90s Boombap, Hip Hop beats and tracks from underground artists. Unfortunately a ton of these aren't on Spotify, although they exist on YouTube in near endless capacity. A lot of my favorite songs of all time aren't great just because th…

I watch bunch of Russian speaking Wh40k lore channels, and the authors experimented with ai music. Now they finish many of their videos with ai banger, based on lore. Mostly rock, but they experimented with different styles. And I like it. “80/90s” generated music is way too easy target. Niche topics (or just topical music) is much harder to get in nice amounts.

There are several channels with pure ai Wh40k music. Some Star Wars creators are doing similar stuff.

I’m actively resisting desire to dump bunch of YouTube links, but if you want to hear what many people already vetted great, I’m happy to share.

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#453

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does it really have to be suprising? Some people already have a life full of surprises (read: stress). Comforting music can help with that.

That's like saying that in order to not be stressed you can only read books that you write yourself. Are we seriously going to act like any of this is normal or healthy?

Your analogy doesn’t make any sense.

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#454
post #381
post #369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also seems that there is a big percentage of people who are completely against AI music for a multitude of reasons. Even if they liked the sound they would still hate it if it was AI generated. But to me this seems silly. Yes I want real artists to make music and be able to make a living not some faceless company spitting out endless music until something works. However at the end of the day if something sounds go…

It's not created any cure or solved crime though. The times it's been applied to those problems, it's either regurgitated stuff that's already in the data or led to the arrest of innocent people. Also, re: music, if I was fine with listening to AI music, why would I listen to the output of someone else's prompt instead of creating my own?

why would I listen to the output of someone else's prompt instead of creating my own?

Because you might not be as good as someone else in doing it, just like it was before AI. "Why would I listen to the output of someone else's piano instead of playing it on my own?"

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#455
post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've also seen people using the term "slop" for low quality human-generated content (lowbrow movies etc)

This is my other problem, people calling things that aren't even AI as "AI slop" which cracks me up but is also concerning.

Now that AI is here, why read Hacker News comments? I bet you can generate quality content with AI! Do we even need to write anymore?

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#456

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find super HARD to believe that we ran out of musicians doing music in the styles of the 80s/90s maybe your friend just doesn't want to search for new music, and that is ok, it's ok to be lazy, not a crime; but saying nobody is making such music is a sad excuse.

> it's ok to be lazy, not a crime It's normal to hate AI being pushed down our throats, but it's a completely different thing when we call people names, who enjoy it on their own.

[deleted]

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#457

Curious to see if this will apply to music. YouTube seems to be filled with AI music these days - just do a search for "focus music" or the like, and you'll see creators pushing new 1-hr tracks every few days with no mention of where the music came from or the fact it is AI generated. People praising it in the comments seem none the wiser (or perhaps they're also bots).

Curious to see if this will apply to music.

I imagine it'll apply to anything with a SynthID watermark. https://deepmind.google/models/synthid/

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#458

Curious to see if this will apply to music. YouTube seems to be filled with AI music these days - just do a search for "focus music" or the like, and you'll see creators pushing new 1-hr tracks every few days with no mention of where the music came from or the fact it is AI generated. People praising it in the comments seem none the wiser (or perhaps they're also bots).

I was at the gym the other day with my bf and there was some godawful lame crap on the playlist. I asked my bf if it was AI generated in his opinion, he laughed and said it was Harry Styles… Most of pop music had driven any creative energy it ever had to the ground already in the 90’s and 00’s and listening music from past 10-15 years or so, even if it’s not AI -generated, it might as well be. In a way AI just brings…

[deleted]

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend of mine who is a very non-technical dermatologist listens exclusively to Suno songs she made. All in genres and styles of songs from her era, the 80s and 90s. Who else is going to make new songs for her? New music almost always targets young people.

I did the same too. I listen exclusively to my own songs made with the help of AI. My styles are orchestra and symphony pop, which I find rare these days. Even if it exists, the lyrics might not be something that I enjoy. So I just write my own lyrics, decides on the melodies, and put it to AI to create a polished version. Do I feel emotional when I listen to it? Of course, its my own lyrics that I wrote. Of course I…

> My listener wont be able to relate with me personally because they don’t know me

What a perfect illustration that while you typed on a keyboard you're so far away from making art.

PS: how many pieces of art that moved you were made by artists you knew or met?

Re: YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos

#460
post #381
post #369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also seems that there is a big percentage of people who are completely against AI music for a multitude of reasons. Even if they liked the sound they would still hate it if it was AI generated. But to me this seems silly. Yes I want real artists to make music and be able to make a living not some faceless company spitting out endless music until something works. However at the end of the day if something sounds go…

It's not created any cure or solved crime though. The times it's been applied to those problems, it's either regurgitated stuff that's already in the data or led to the arrest of innocent people. Also, re: music, if I was fine with listening to AI music, why would I listen to the output of someone else's prompt instead of creating my own?

because the other people may write better prompts than you
Post reply on HN