Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

ccunpacked.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

451–460 of 464 posts

Re: Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

#451

Post by menaerus »

troupo wrote: post #263
menaerus wrote: post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, now the only thing remaining is you convincing Anthropic that they're doing wrong. Or alternatively you change your perspective.

"Windows is the world's most popular desktop consumer OS. Microsoft are doing everything right, and should never ever change. Who are we to criticise them" Meanwhile I apparently need to change my persoective about this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598488

My response is a bit more nuanced than your interpretation of "no, we should not care about the quality".

Re: Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

#452

Post by dandellion »

criley2 wrote: post #198
dandellion wrote: post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You asked why the size of the code matters, I gave you the answer. If you want to ramble about the non technical aspects of software development talk to someone else, I'm not interested.

I asked a rhetorical question to get the reader to think about a topic. I was not looking for a rote recitation of a well-known textbook answer. Maybe you should not be on the comment section of an engineering website if you find discussion so offensive.

I'm pretty sure I can post however I want, so I'll be ignoring your suggestion. Also I didn't say I find it offensive, just that I'm not interested.

Re: Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

#453

Post by yoe »

nashadelic wrote: post #448
ontouchstart wrote: post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://gistpreview.github.io/?30a4e491eb2df7523ecc120b86feb... (pi) https://gist.github.com/ontouchstart/d7e3b7ec6e568164edfd482... (cc) M5 (24G)

wow, the pi version looks... better v. cc?

yeah true, its looks a bit cleaner and more readable

Re: Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

#456

Post by xp84 »

kubanczyk wrote: post #425
xp84 wrote: post #349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“if they deliver” As I’m reading this, I’m thinking about how in 1980. It was imagined that everyone needed to learn how to program in BASIC or COBOL, and that the way computers would become ubiquitous would be that everybody would be writing program programs for them. That turned out to be a quaint and optimistic idea. It seems like the pitch today is that every company that has a software-like need will be able to…

> breaking capitalism It seems non sequitur. This hypothetical scenario sounds like entrenching capitalism, because it would concentrate capital even more. It would probably weaken democracy and weaken free market (esp. the job market), yes. > society will collapse before then because of said breaking of capitalism itself Or, maybe the society would continue to exist with even more inequality? And, of course, much ch…

I suppose it depends on your perspective. I guess I mean broken kind of in the gaming sense, where a gameplay mechanic is 'broken' if you can exploit it to completely subvert the entire intended way it's supposed to work.

You could argue that capitalism was very not broken in 1960, when you could get a job at 18 selling shoes, driving a cab, or delivering milk or whatever, and support a family of five on your salary, save for retirement, and go on yearly vacations.

It's arguably somewhat broken today, when gestures around things are like this.

I'd say it would be entirely broken if AGI means a few hundred billionaires who have ownership stakes in an AI company simply capture all the wealth in the world while most of the rest starve, but the robots help you put down the peasant uprisings and farm and raise crops for you.

I agree with you though that technically, capitalism will still be 'going strong' unless the peasants are able to overpower the AI robot billionaire industrial complex and burn it all down.

Re: Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

#457

Post by kristopolous »

kristopolous wrote: post #387
kristopolous wrote: post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really wish I had that clout-chasing gene - it doesn't even occur to me until I see someone else do it. I'm serious. The hype chasing clearly clearly matters. . things like this: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code I mean ok, serious people put in years of effort for 100 of those stars ... it's continually wild how extremely irrelevant hard effortful careful work is. I think that's the game. Get up, look at the…

here's my attempt: https://github.com/kristopolous/Claudette My shit's always too complicated. let's see

And.... Flop

Re: Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide

#460

Post by sensei85 »

autocracy101 wrote: post #114

Author here. I built this in a few hours after the Claude Code leak. I've been working on my own coding agent setup for a while. I mostly use pi [0] because it's minimal and easy to extend. When the leak happened, I wanted to study how Anthropic structured things: the tool system, how the agent loop flows, A 500K line codebase is a lot to navigate, so I mapped it visually to give myself a quick reference I could come…

Could you share what your agent setup and harness looks like with PI with what you've learnt from the Claude leak.
Post reply on HN