Live data from Hacker News

Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

immich.app

451–460 of 713 posts

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#451

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also YouTube.com serves a lot of scam advertisements. They should block that too.

I think google is crumbling under the weight of their size. They are no longer able to process the requested commercials with due diligence.

They can afford to hire thousands of people to swiftly identify scams and take punitive action. And pay them well.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A safe browsing service is not a terrible idea (which is why both Safari & Firefox use Google for this) & while I hate that Google has a monopoly here, I do think a safe browsing service should absolutely block your preview environments if those environments have potential dangers for visitors to them & are accessible to the public.

However, why does it work in such a way that it blocks the whole domain and not just the subdomains? Is it far fetched that the people controlling a subdomain may not be the same that control the domain?

Which subdomains?

To be clear, the issue here is that some subdomains pose a risk to the overall domain - visiting any increases your risk from others. It's also related to a GitHub workflow that auto-generates new subdomains on demand, so there's no possibility to have a fixed list of known subdomains since new ones are constantly being created.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#453

Happened to me last week. One morning we wake up and the whole company website does not work. Not advice with some time to fix any possible problem, just blocked. We gave very bad image to our clients and users, and had to give explanations of a false positive from google detection. The culprit, according to google search console, was a double redirect on our web email domain (/ -> inbox -> login). After just moving…

> The culprit, according to google search console, was a double redirect on our web email domain (/ -> inbox -> login). I find it hard to believe that the double redirect itself tripped it: multiple redirects in a row is completely normal—discouraged in general because it hurts performance, but you encounter them all the time . For example, http://foo.example → https://foo.example → https://www.foo.example (http → ht…

I suspect you're right... The problem is, and i've experienced this with many big tech companies, you never really get any explanation. You report an issue, and then, magically, it's "fixed," with no further communication.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#454

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What i really don't understand at least here in Europe the advertising partner (adsense) must investigate at least minimally whether the advertising is illegal or fraudulent, i understand that sites.google etc are under "safe harbor" but that's not the point with adsense since people from google "click" the publish button and also get money to publish that ad.

I have reported over a dozen ads to AdSense (Europe) because of them being outright scams (e.g. on weather apps, an AdSense banner claiming "There is a new upgrade to this program, click here to download it") . Google has invariably closed my reports claiming that they do not find any violation of the adsense policies.

Same thing with Instagram, they accept all scam ads.

Google and Meta are trillion dollar criminal enterprises. The lion's share of their income comes from fraud and scams, with real victims having their lives destroyed. That is the sad truth, no matter how good and important some of their services are. They will never stop their principal source of income.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#456

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have reported over a dozen ads to AdSense (Europe) because of them being outright scams (e.g. on weather apps, an AdSense banner claiming "There is a new upgrade to this program, click here to download it") . Google has invariably closed my reports claiming that they do not find any violation of the adsense policies.

Same thing with Instagram, they accept all scam ads. Google and Meta are trillion dollar criminal enterprises. The lion's share of their income comes from fraud and scams, with real victims having their lives destroyed. That is the sad truth, no matter how good and important some of their services are. They will never stop their principal source of income.

They’re far too embedded politically to ever face consequence too. I hope someday we can get a serious anti-corruption candidate.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#457

If there are any googlers here, I'd like to report an even more dangerous website. As much as 30-50% of the traffic to it relates to malware or scams, and it has gone unpunished for a very long time. The address appears to be adsense.google.com.

Yeah - that website keeps on spamming me down with useless stuff. I was able to block most of this via ublock origin but Google disabled this - can not download it from here anymore: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin/cjpal... Funniest nonsense "explanation": "This extension is no longer available because it doesn't follow best practices for Chrome extensions." In reality Google killed it because…

DNS level blockers like NextDNS are much easier to use and works for the entire device.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#458

We really need an internet Bill of Rights. Google has too much power to delete your company from existence with no due process or recourse. If any company controls some (high) percentage of a particular market, say web browsers, search, or e-commerce, or social media, the public's equal access should start to look more like a right and less like an at-will contract. 30 years ago, if a shop had a falling out with the…

It’s almost as if those companies have country like powers.

Maybe they should be subject to same limitations like First Amendment etc.

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#459

We really need an internet Bill of Rights. Google has too much power to delete your company from existence with no due process or recourse. If any company controls some (high) percentage of a particular market, say web browsers, search, or e-commerce, or social media, the public's equal access should start to look more like a right and less like an at-will contract. 30 years ago, if a shop had a falling out with the…

Force interoperability. In 2009 I could run Pidgin and load messages from AIM, FB Messages, Yahoo... Where did that go? I suspect the EU will be the first region to push the big tech companies on this.

They're too busy trying to strip encryption to do anything

Re: Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

#460

We really need an internet Bill of Rights. Google has too much power to delete your company from existence with no due process or recourse. If any company controls some (high) percentage of a particular market, say web browsers, search, or e-commerce, or social media, the public's equal access should start to look more like a right and less like an at-will contract. 30 years ago, if a shop had a falling out with the…

Force interoperability. In 2009 I could run Pidgin and load messages from AIM, FB Messages, Yahoo... Where did that go? I suspect the EU will be the first region to push the big tech companies on this.

In 2025 you can use Beeper (or run your own local Matrix server with the opensource bridges) and get the same result with WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, Discord, Google Messages, etc. etc.
Post reply on HN