Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

code.mendhak.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

451–460 of 585 posts

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#451

Post by Macha »

mcgrath_sh wrote: post #269
diggan wrote: post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I date food we put in the fridge/freezer What date are you putting on the food? Every packaging here in Spain (and Europe I assume) has both the production date and "best before" dates printed on them from the factory, and stuff that doesn't have packaging you know if they're bad by looking/smelling/tasting.

I batch cook and freeze meals, and some of them look similar (sauce and chicken vs sauce and pork) and I want to eat the older stuff first. There are also some products that are recommended to be disposed of within X days of opening, which fall well before their best by date.

When I batch cook meals, I then eat them over the next few days until either it's done or it's been too long for that meal. Then I batch cook something else. I usually don't have multiple batches on the go.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#452

Post by hughw »

taftster wrote: post #375
self_awareness wrote: post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sender didn't specify the version in his request, so I find it natural that they've sent him the latest version.

The author mentioned this exact problem. Quoting: > There was a problem that I noticed right away, though: this text was from the GPL v3, not the GPL v2. In my original request I had never mentioned the GPL version I was asking about. >The original license notice makes no mention of GPL version either. Should the fact that the license notice contained an address have been enough metadata or a clue, that I was actuall…

A Sid Caesar skit showed doughboys celebrating and one shouted "World War 1 is over!"... when they made GPLv2 maybe they didn't anticipate creating future versions (although yeah, if you're already on v2 you should foresee that).

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#453

Post by schlauerfox »

yieldcrv wrote: post #304
dharmab wrote: post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you pay for things above a few thousand dollars? I guess if you don't ever buy a pricey car or own a home you wouldn't need it.

wire transfer, or walk into the bank and have them create a cashier's check and a normal check is the same as an ACH transfer, so I will do the ACH transfer or lawyer's escrow and every other larger transfer has been cryptocurrency in my life, its been over a decade of that unlimited amount, zero scrutiny, 24/7/365 option (I've tried various other country's and international system transfers, and the convenience is c…

There was a time that printed checks had to use special laser toner called MICR Toner that was magnetic so the magneto readers could machine read the check bottoms routing and account numbers, but that went away when the Fed just ran it all as ACH/ electronically and optically scanned checks around the time mobile deposit and well after OCR became a thing. Last I checked the rule was still present in the statues.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#454

Post by xp84 »

crmi wrote: post #427
Scoundreller wrote: post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They needed US stamps.

I didn't see any request for a return envelope or stamp. Author decided to include them (unless I missed something).

It seems like common courtesy for me. Given the FSF are providing that service out of altruism, and are not the ones who neglected to give OP the license in the first place, it's only appropriate to not impose upon them to go buy stamps to send an international letter.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#455

Post by dpifke »

ndiddy wrote: post #440
yyhhsj0521 wrote: post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had to file my tax by postal mail in the US. Granted there is the option to file online, but that only works for ~80% of the people when things are completely within the intended domain. I have just one extra item outside of standard salary slips and some investment income, so I had to file physically.

For federal returns, there's a site called Free File Fillable Forms, which has digitized versions of all the tax forms. Unlike the normal IRS Free File program, there's no restriction on income. If you're comfortable filing paper tax returns, this is the exact same process except the returns are digital and sent over the internet. For state returns, the process depends on your state but everywhere I've lived has a fr…

From https://www.irs.gov/e-file-providers/free-file-fillable-form...:

Attaching statements — This program does not allow you to attach any documents to your return, except those available through the program. If you need to attach any such documents, you will have to print and mail in the return.

Especially with business returns, it's common to have to attach statements to certain forms, for example if you choose the de minimis election for equipment repairs that would otherwise have to be capitalized, or when the § 174 changes went into effect and everyone had to start amortizing software development expenses over multiple years. You can't do that on Free File Fillable Forms.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#456

Post by pantalaimon »

self_awareness wrote: post #380
kevincox wrote: post #361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does a sender who only has a GPLv2 license notice even know that there is a v3? Should they first send a letter asking which versions are available?

If the sender requests GPLv2, he should receive GPL version 2. If the sender requests GPL, I find it natural for him to receive version 3, because it's the latest version. At the time of receiving the license, he gains knowledge about the existence of version 3 (the header on the print says the GPL he received is version 3). If the sender has a notice about GPLv2, it means that there's a high chance that there's also…

GPLv2 by default means GPLv2 or later, so GPLv3 is perfectly valid indeed.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#457

Post by Macha »

cannam wrote: post #362
bombcar wrote: post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Legal size folders exist and are widely used by people who use ... legal size paper. Legal folders can be great to be able to print letter-sized things on, then you have an area at the bottom to write notes and stuff.

I'm just about old enough to remember (in the UK) foolscap paper, an imperial size also a bit longer than A4. You never see it any more (at least I don't) but foolscap sized box-files are still readily available. I guess a slightly bigger box than you need is not usually a problem.

Huh, this explains why some of my older teachers would call a4 pads as foolscap pads. I guess the paper size had been updated by the time I got to school, but their terminology wasn't.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#458

Post by Macha »

tialaramex wrote: post #449
School-Cotton wrote: post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you explain concretely why it matters in daily life that I can cut the paper posters are printed on in half several times to wind up with paper of the size that letters are printed on, and that these have the same aspect ratio? Why would I ever want to do that / why should I care that it's possible? I'm not trying to be combative; I genuinely don't know.

Not the paper, the stuff on the paper scales the same. Want a large poster and then also handbills to give out? They're identical. Got 15 full size sheets of colour information but now want to turn it into a pocket handout ? No problem, it's the same thing but smaller. This feels obvious - of course it works like that, until your paper sizes aren't using this ratio (which the US ones don't) and then the frustration i…

Isn't the important part here just using a consistent aspect ratio?

Like the fact that the aspect ratio chosen allows manufacturers to just use one base sheet and then subdivide it into smaller page sizes is convenient for manufacturers, but it's not a necessary property for scaling the contents of the page.

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#459

Post by mrloop »

bongodongobob wrote: post #220
ryandrake wrote: post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Not sure if it's being exaggerated for comedic purposes but it is interesting to me how alien the act of sending a letter by post is to the author. It was pretty recognizable as trolling--the very good and clever "old school Internet" style of trolling where it sounds plausible and sincere, but then you get done reading it and say, "Oh lawd, he got me! Good one!" The kind of writing that people used to spend a lot…

> I refuse to believe there are adults out there where things like using a pen to write and mailing a letter are alien concepts that need to be learned. Well, believe it. I'm in my 40s and haven't written a letter since I was a kid. Why would I ever have to? Ask someone who was born in 2003 if they've ever written and mailed a letter. 99% are going to say no.

I had to inform numerous companies of my mums death last year. A lot of them had either phone support with very long wait times or a postal address, no email. It took me less time to write a letter and post it than to wait on hold

Re: I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)

#460

Post by ACS_Solver »

diggan wrote: post #283
genewitch wrote: post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Three weeks ago I was part of a comment thread on this very site, where people were wondering why banks still had buildings for people to go in to.

In some countries, it is somewhat of a question "why" though. For example, banks in Sweden stopped carrying cash, and AFAIK (at least when I lived there) you interact with them either online or via the telephone, even cards are sent your home address instead of being picked up the branch and so on. Contrast to where I live now (Spain) where I can still go to the bank to deposit/withdraw money, so the use case for the…

Yes, there are few reasons to go to a Swedish bank branch, and they've been closing branches, too. Almost everything is done online - really goes for most things in Sweden, not just banks.

You don't even visit a branch to become a customer as long as you have an account with some other bank, which gives you BankID, a digital ID/signature system that's ubiquitous in Sweden. I have accounts with three Swedish banks. Of those, one doesn't have physical locations to visit, and a second I never visited. It's surely been ten years since I went to the third, my main bank, in person, and the branch office I went to closed years ago. Looking it up, my main bank only has one office left in the city, it's only open for three hours a day and requires a prior appointment for any services.

Cash is only handled by a few bank branches (not all banks) and even then by prior booking - cash has been pretty much gone from society for a while now. Your card gets sent to you by postal mail. If you need to talk to someone at the bank, they'll suggest telephone or video calls, and will only see you in person as a last resort. Safe deposit boxes have also been largely discontinued as a service.

Post reply on HN