Live data from Hacker News

Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

bloomberg.com

451–460 of 931 posts

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#451
post #385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nothing about the tariffs make any sense. The want to use the tariffs to negotiate with countries but also say they want to use tariffs to bring back manufacturing. If you are using tariffs to negotiate then once the country gives you what you want, you have to lift the tariff thus the free market keeping manufacturing overseas. If you want to bring back manufacturing then you can't use the tariff to negotiate. I am…

Maybe Trump genuienly wants to disrupt neoliberalism? Now, a lot of people on the left use "neoliberalism" in the same way people on the right use "woke", or (Eu) football fans use the word "offside" i.e. it means "it's anything the other side do that I don't like". But neoliberalism actually has a definition used by more serious people - generally free trade and the reduction of government interference. Maybe Trump…

>Maybe Trump doesn't want globalisation,

Strange of him to renegotiate NAFTA in his first term then

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#452

Why is no one highlighting how this is repeating history 8 years ago? I don’t get it, there’s this magical reporting gap where all of this is new strategy but it’s the exact same strategy. Why don’t we acknowledge this instead of searching for some new angle? Here are a bunch of links from 2018/2019: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/13/apple-dodges-iphone-tariff-a... https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/investing/t052-s00…

[flagged]

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#453
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no plan. Talk tough, reverse under pressure, rinse repeat. Anyone surprised must not have watched season one which aired in 2019.

If Trump is America's Napoleon III, who is the world's modern Otto von Bismark?

[deleted]

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the only explanation that has made sense to me so far. And it makes even more sense based on these exemptions. https://www.instagram.com/share/_jW_V1hwM This is Senator Chris Murphy explaining it’s not economic policy, it’s an attempt to blackmail corporations into submission by making a deal with him in return for sanctions relief. Keep an eye out for what Apple and nvidia might have agreed to give.

The term for this is extortion. The last time tariffs were this high, it led to rampant corruption as companies would pay off customs officers. This was one of the reasons for switching to an income tax. For the current administration this possibility counts as a major opportunity to generate personal wealth. But this isn't the only reason for the policy. For someone who is at heart a coward, bullying and brandishing…

You are 100% spot on in this analysis. Thank you for summarizing it so well.

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#457
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

America has finally become the banana republic it has accused others of being.

That's a funny way of looking at it because the banana republics weren't called that because they were "bananas" or something. They were called that to identify which of those countries had had state and megacorp interference and government toplings, by mostly the United Fruit Company - an American company. Whatever the banana republics were they were turned into that by the US's doing, so it's funny that now the ter…

This has been the best TIL moment for me on HN.

Thanks, man, I am now in the rabbit hole of reading up.

In that same context, did you read the article about how diplomats were "convincing" the Mexican government to not use open source over Microsoft?

It sure sounds like the same strategy.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/1013776/

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The French Revolution didn’t go “straight to guillotines”, not even close.

I cannot tell what point you're making here. Why is this important to say?

Sorry for being vague. I was trying to point out that the first phase of the revolution (“the Revolution of 1789”) was basically a liberal aristocratic revolution not unlike the American Revolution. The radical egalitarians that orchestrated the Terror didn’t seize power until a few years later.

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#459
post #166

I am among the few who think it might eventually prove itself a good idea. To start with, Europe has no good cards to play. Ultimately, Europe will side with the United States while it builds self-sufficiency on several fronts, especially defense. Europe also recognizes that the complete relocation of production capacity into China wasn't good in the long run; it's just that they had no ability to act on their own. T…

I also imagine this is maximum negative sentiment.

I follow the Chinese economy pretty closely and I just can't imagine 2025 passes without a deal.

Of course, neither Trump or Xi were going to back down here before a big meeting. I don't see how this is sustainable on any real time frame though for either economy.

Some people seem to be framing this as some kind of win for China. That is crazy. Chinese stocks had been in the toilet for a while, got a slight bump and that was mostly erased last week. I am far more confident in my US bets than China bets here.

Re: Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs

#460
post #30

From an outsider’s perspective, it’s difficult to discern any coherent U.S. strategy—assuming one even exists. One day it’s a 145% tariff on China. The next, it’s “Well, it’s still 145%, but Apple and Nvidia are exempted because their stock prices might take a hit.” Then comes a 90-day pause, adding to the confusion. It’s not clear whether Jamieson Greer is actually steering this, or if any of it was thoroughly thoug…

This is the only explanation that has made sense to me so far. And it makes even more sense based on these exemptions. https://www.instagram.com/share/_jW_V1hwM This is Senator Chris Murphy explaining it’s not economic policy, it’s an attempt to blackmail corporations into submission by making a deal with him in return for sanctions relief. Keep an eye out for what Apple and nvidia might have agreed to give.

Instead of coming to Trump for pledges of political loyalty those companies should instead come to Europe to be able to make business again freely.
Post reply on HN