Live data from Hacker News

Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

brutecat.com

451–460 of 487 posts

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#451

I found this title confusing. For those who didn't make it toward the end of the article: the leaked emails didn't cost them anything (except their time and ingenuity), and they received 10k as the bug bounty.

Thank you, I think the title is misleading and your comment clears up the confusion.

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#452
post #340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought they meant providing the services to leak the email of any user for $10K, perhaps per user. :)

I think this was the clickbaity intention behind the title

I agree, this feels intentionally misleading.

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#453
post #352

i'd really like a way to email a youtube channel owner though. even if sits in a youtube inbox for a year. most of them don't have email contacts and its hard to reach out for sponsorship or any other deals.

A long long time ago...in an internet far away...

YouTube used to have DMs so you could do this. I don't remember exactly when it was removed. Probably late aughts.

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#454
post #219
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why isn't that conceivably worth more than $10,000? If it exposed passwords as well then that would be worth a lot more, but a list of email addresses is not the most valuable of things on its own.

Potentially deanonymizing pseudonymous Youtube accounts sounds pretty bad by itself.

> deanonymizing pseudonymous Youtube accounts

But its not, its giving their gmail address which is mostlikely something like mrbeast01@gmail.com

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The USofA is the bizarre exception here: The United States has a rather unique way of writing the date that is imitated in very few other countries (although Canada and Belize do also use the form). In America, the date is formally written in month/day/year form. They don't use metric, still use First Past the Post voting, elect a mini monarch with effectively unchecked powers, ... it's an odd place.

Also, the US military used/uses DDMMMYYYY format, i.e., 15JAN2025, where MMM is the month abbreviation, which is similar to one of the formats used in Romania. This has the benefits of unambiguous parsing and no need for component separators but lacks lexicographical sort-ability like ISO 8601. A format like YYYYMMMDD might some of the advantages of ISO 8601 by keeping items of the same year and month together at a m…

The thing is, lexigraphical sorting is something that can be easily parsed, parse the date and sort it how you want.

The standard was for written and radio communication to be unambiguous.

If you're writing software, believe me you want a format like 13FEB2025 over anything except maybe unix timestamp in UTC.

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#456

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't oversell the place. It also has it's down-sides.

Mass shootings, out-of-control police, bankruptcies from for-profit healthcare and expensive medications, Bibles and Creationism in public schools, widespread ignorance about the world and just about everything, and millions (vastly undercounted) of homeless people. But seriously, America is awesome for rich people if you don't mind living in a poor, third-world country that still believes it's a first-world, excepti…

Good, stay out then. It'll do just fine without you

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#457
post #73

Since every 3rd message on this thread (at the time I wrote this) is about how Google underpaid for this bug, some quick basic things about vulnerability valuations: * Valuations for server-side vulnerabilities are low, because vendors don't compete for them. There is effectively no grey market for a server-side vulnerability. It is difficult for a third party to put a price on a bug that Google can kill instantaneou…

Disagree. 10k seems low considering the value to those who ship OSINT services this would have had. Such services get data from very interesting places.

I also wouldn't call it just a server-side web bug, it's more like data exfiltration. TFA author could have sold it for more money to some gray market dudes if he were willing to accept bitcoin.

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't oversell the place. It also has it's down-sides.

Mass shootings, out-of-control police, bankruptcies from for-profit healthcare and expensive medications, Bibles and Creationism in public schools, widespread ignorance about the world and just about everything, and millions (vastly undercounted) of homeless people. But seriously, America is awesome for rich people if you don't mind living in a poor, third-world country that still believes it's a first-world, excepti…

"America is awesome for ambitious people" FTFY

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yyyy-mm-dd is the iso standard, w/ the benefits of logical consistency (larger to smaller units left to right) and -- best of all -- sortability.

In any case there are two sane ways to write dates, and the middle-endian format is not one of them.

The other is the US military one 14FEB2025,yes? That and ISO are all we need.

Re: Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10k

#460
post #403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the D/M/Y date format at the end of the article, they may not be native English speakers (at least they aren’t American).

The USofA is the bizarre exception here: The United States has a rather unique way of writing the date that is imitated in very few other countries (although Canada and Belize do also use the form). In America, the date is formally written in month/day/year form. They don't use metric, still use First Past the Post voting, elect a mini monarch with effectively unchecked powers, ... it's an odd place.

We write the date that way because that's how we say the dates and conversation: today is February 13th, 2025.

02/13/2025. I personally use ISO dates because i like getting sorting for free.

Post reply on HN