Live data from Hacker News

Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

tedium.co

451–460 of 485 posts

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#451

I think, for viewers, it's a win. Free movies, no DRM, and no region locks? But it's ironic that YouTube is now offering a more open and accessible archive than most official streaming services

At the moment those are region locked.

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#452
post #30

Old movies have been available on various "free ad-supported streaming television" for a while now, so I'm actually more surprised it took copyright holders that long to realize that Youtube also shows ads and doesn't require people to install some wonky app that might or might not be available for their platform. Of course, region-specific copyright deals are incredibly complex etc. etc., so I could imagine it was j…

I assume that bandwidth is by far the biggest cost for running your own streaming service, so letting Google take that hit makes a lot of sense.

Don't forget the cost of storage. In the days before streaming, WB used to store (digitized) movies on LTO tapes, which are dirt cheap. The programming software would load up a tape the day before broadcast and transfer the contents to disk.

A streaming service needs to have all offered content available on disk. I can absolutely see WB offloading the storage cost to Google.

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#453
post #23

For your searching convenience, they do seem to have all their full movies in a playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5Y4rNBCLaU&list=PL7Eup7JXSc... That will pop up to The 11th Hour but the playlist has them all.

Video unavailable The uploader has not made this video available in your country

so much for that

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#454

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume that bandwidth is by far the biggest cost for running your own streaming service, so letting Google take that hit makes a lot of sense.

>> I assume that bandwidth is by far the biggest cost for running your own streaming service, so letting Google take that hit makes a lot of sense. Judging from the clunky, buggy, nonsensical experiences on 2nd tier streaming services (i.e., everything except Netflix, Amazon Prime, YouTube, Disney+, Max), I'd say the biggest cost is probably hiring a decent Engineering+Product+Test team. There are complexities here,…

I'd imagine the biggest cost might be not hiring a decent engineering team - since then you are probably spending a boatload more on server costs and bandwidth and losing customers due to bugs and glitches

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What device are you using? I use Apple TVs, and Apple TV+ is consistently extremely high quality streaming for me. YouTube is incredibly painful to use because their tvOS UI is garbage. Quality's OK, though.

I'm using an Apple TV (device) to stream Apple TV (the streaming service.) Streaming quality is great, so agree on that. It is the bugginess of the app. For example, with the Apple TV native remote, the silly touchpad is super clunky, painfully lacking the exponential fast forwarding i'm so used to with better services. The experience with the Samsung remote is very buggy. For example, when the "Dismiss" or "Skip" bu…

Apple TV+ is great on Roku (have an older 4K box that still has Toslink output). Also liked the experience on a newer Apple TV box that now has buttons for scrolling (only other Apple TV box I've used is the first generation which is touchpad only and I'm not a fan of)

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#456

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I LOATHE peacock. I don't know what checks they do at the start of the stream, but they always peg me at 720p or lower resolution despite having over 300mb. Its not an issue on any other streaming app and they give you no option to set it manually. Streams look like a dog's breakfast on my 4k TVs.

Its just them being cheap. They probably set every one to a max of 720p, hope most people do not realise (cutting down bandwidth costs) and let them set max quality themselves.

On Roku (actual box not integrated) Peacock has been good quality. Definitely hits 1080P with a decent bitrate. I suspect the software teams only have the bandwidth to focus on a few of the more popular devices (so probably Roku and Apple TV boxes) and others suffer

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#457
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only 2 companies that made money during the “streaming wars” were Netflix, which had the infrastructure in place already and didn’t need to build anything from scratch, and Sony, which decided not to build any streaming service and just license all its content out. Seems WBD is following the lead of a winner. * https://www.yahoo.com/tech/sony-succeeded-becoming-powerful-...

Disney has been profitable lately. Also odd to say that Netflix had the infrastructure already. They built it from scratch.

Also YouTube has been somewhat profitable.

Re: Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?

#458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm willing to modify the bet to "Just one person does all the labor with AI as the primary tool". What I meant by "completely done by AI" is that AI is doing the vast majority of the heavy lifting. Sound, visuals, script and ultimately humans are just acting as the director of that AI. In otherwords, a masterpiece of cinema created by one person and AI prompts. Masterpiece being judged by the above success criteria.…

The bet is stupid. David Lynch The Grandmother would be considered a "masterpiece" by this definition. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y0rYWVcxF4 Anyone could make something along those lines right now with AI tools. The ratings is because of what the fame David Lynch achieved after making this. AI video is going to stall bad because it is just too expensive and what we have now is complete trash. Sora is such a mas…

Nope, the video isn't long enough and wouldn't qualify.

I also agree that AI will stall which is the point of the bet. I also don't think an AI recreation of the Grandmother would see critical acclaim. Lynch already did it.

Post reply on HN