451–460 of 1001 posts
Given the lyrics for Three Blind Mice, I try to get ChatGPT to create an image of three blind mice, one of which has had its tail cut off.
It's pretty much impossible for it to get this image straight. Even this new 4o version.
Its ability to spell in images has greatly improved, though.
I found these videos quite hard to watch. There is a level of cringe that I found a bit unpleasant. It’s like some kind of uncanny valley of human interaction that I don’t get on nearly the same level with the text version.
While it is probably pretty normal for California, the insincere flattery and patronizing eagerness are definitely grating But then you have to stack that up against the fact that we are examining a technology and nitpicking over its tone of voice .
It seems like both the voice and responses can be tuned pretty easily though so hopefully that kind of thing can just be loaded in your custom instructions.
A test I've been using for each new version still fails. Given the lyrics for Three Blind Mice, I try to get ChatGPT to create an image of three blind mice, one of which has had its tail cut off. It's pretty much impossible for it to get this image straight. Even this new 4o version. Its ability to spell in images has greatly improved, though.
Too bad they consume 25x the electricity Google does. https://www.brusselstimes.com/world-all-news/1042696/chatgpt...
What if we actually counted the electricity that the websites use instead of just the search engine page ?
The most impressive part is that the voice uses the right feelings and tonal language during the presentation. I'm not sure how much of that was that they had tested this over and over, but it is really hard to get that right so if they didn't fake it in some way I'd say that is revolutionary.
(I work at OpenAI.) It's really how it works.
As a language learner, this would be tremendously useful.
Impressed by the model so far. As far as independent testing goes, it is topping our leaderboard for chess puzzle solving by a wide margin now: https://github.com/kagisearch/llm-chess-puzzles?tab=readme-o...
OAI just made an embarrassment of Google's fake demo earlier this year. Given how this was recorded, I am pretty certain it's authentic.
I don't doubt this is authentic, but if they really wanted to fake those demos, it would be pretty easy to do using pre-recorded lines and staged interactions.
I really value how open they are being about its limitations.
I admit I drink the koolaid and love LLMs and their applications. But damn, the way it’s responds in the demo gave me goosebumps in a bad way. Like an uncanny valley instincts kicks in.
I also thought the screwups, although minor, were interesting. Like when it thought his face was a desk because it did not update the image it was "viewing". It is still not perfect, which made the whole thing more believable.