Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They are able to entertain millions of people around the globe while doing it and some build incredible wealth at the same time. I think you meant hoard incredible wealth? There's a limit to how much wealth you can actually create with immaterial entertainment alone. Even a best seller book: it takes time to read, so while it provides value to millions of readers, it also removes value in the form of opportunity co…
If people do not "make" money (i.e. create value), how do you explain the increase in the standard of living over the last 100 years?
https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption
That will catch up to us. It already has, in many parts of the world, and it's not looking like it'll get better soon.
And let's not forget, it's not just people who have paid the price.
> The contemporary rate of extinction of species is estimated at 100 to 1,000 times higher than the background extinction rate, the historically typical rate of extinction (in terms of the natural evolution of the planet); also, the current rate of extinction is 10 to 100 times higher than in any of the previous mass extinctions in the history of Earth.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
The ecocide which we've inflicted on the planet for the last 100 years will some day be seen for what it is - an atrocity.
https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995
All of which is to say nothing about the inequality in how that shareholder wealth is distributed, which is incredibly short-sighted for literally billions of reasons. 8 Americans own more wealth than 4 billion humans. It's perverse beyond comprehension.