Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Release 89.0

mozilla.org

451–460 of 487 posts

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#451
post #440

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I miss text that would just wrap along the length of the window. Using Github always infuriates me because I have a nice, wide macbook screen, yet they force code to be displayed in a text box that uses maybe 1/3 of my screen width

My monitor is too wide for this to make sense

You are not forced to run your browser maximized.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#453
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It works on my Firefox profile and I just updated to v. 89.

Is there any way to make page inspector work on browser chrome to see xul tree/css? Searching on the internet for "firefox chrome inspector" is just ridiculously frustrating because of naming conflict with the other browser. Hmm, looking at css, it's still possible to toggle browser.proton.enabled to false, to get at least some of the old UI back (tabs will be less crappy), but the new "color" theme will persist.

I've used this tutorial [0] to get the built-in inspector to work with Fx chrome elements.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/73dvty/tutorial...

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#454

Several awful things became immediately apparent: 1. the menus use their own font instead of the one specified by the OS (Windows 10). And of course, there is no way to disable this, or at least I could not find one. 2. The "current tab" highlight looks too much like an entry field. Please bring the tab metaphor back, or at least allow the user to keep the existing interface. 3. The padding on the browser tabs (and m…

4. If a tab plays sound, it replaces the favicon with a picture of a speaker. (in compact mode) https://imgur.com/1rwvByM

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#455

Several awful things became immediately apparent: 1. the menus use their own font instead of the one specified by the OS (Windows 10). And of course, there is no way to disable this, or at least I could not find one. 2. The "current tab" highlight looks too much like an entry field. Please bring the tab metaphor back, or at least allow the user to keep the existing interface. 3. The padding on the browser tabs (and m…

1. looks bad on Linux as well. The spacing is terribly off, and I think the hinting is as well

2. "Current Tab" is badly designed[0], because I can no longer tell which is the current tab. This is especially true if you're using container tabs.

3. I don't mind this much, but I have a wide-screen. But I can see this being a nuisance on smaller screens.

[0]: https://i.imgur.com/cCUN8iy.png

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#456
post #420
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wouldn't be so terrible, if installable themes were actual UI themes that could modify all the styles and not just a background image.

That'd be a maintenance nightmare...

Not if the UI is styled using CSS. Which it is.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#457

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's awful. "Search with Google" is actually the only reason I ever use the context menu. Copy? Keyboard/mouse buttons for that. Select All? Why would I want to do that when I just made a selection? Print Selection? How common can that actually be, to justify being positions above "search the internet for this thing"?? Take screenshot???? Really?? Why does "Inspect Accessibility Properties" get real estate there? Tha…

Just want to say "Take screenshot" is the only reason I use context menu.

Is it just me or is it not obvious that this entry actually does something useful instead of duplicating the OS screenshot feature? An image of the entire page including the part not on screen isn't even a screen-shot.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#458
post #265
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't mean the icon, but there's now a line for actual text besides the page title, which I'm assuming is/can be used to display useful info.

Can it? My bar is full of tabs so all I see there is "PLAY" (the fading at the end of the button makes the "I" and "N" hard to see and the "G" is completely gone)

I would assume so, but as said, I have vertical tabs so I'm not really using it myself. If it doesn't now then it at least seems obvious it can in the future.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#459
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do they? https://i.imgur.com/Oemlwfo.png

Favioli is a good solution to this problem https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/favioli/

This addon looks good, but I'm too tired to have to relearn new locations of elements, differences in UI, changes in context menus every 1.5 year Mozilla decided to improve shit. I've been using Firefox since Phoenix 2002, but this time I'm giving up. Moved all to Brave Browser.

Re: Firefox Release 89.0

#460

Does anyone feel that this new UI brings notable improvement? I don't think it is much worse, other than taking some extra vertical space but for the most part my reaction is "meh". I feel like these resources could have been spent much better in other parts of the browser. Am I missing some reason why this is worth the investment?

My initial reaction to the beta version was that the UI was much worse, but I decided to give it a chance and spend a few weeks trying to get used to it. Now that I've had time to play with it, I'm even more convinced my initial reaction was correct. But I've also had time to reflect on why, and in my view there are two problems with this new design. Removing visual separators from the tabs makes them much harder to…

Pretty good observations. I'm someone who knows very little about UX/UI and what you said makes a lot of sense. Having the active tab "depressed" is more typical.

While I think the redesign looks good, I don't really have strong feelings on it. I mostly just want a supported interface, so I finally gave up on compact mode. It's just ok. I guess they wanted to differentiate themselves from Chromium browsers in a more significant way?

While most complaints, including from my spouse, are that the tabs are no longer delineated, that part hasn't bothered me much. I consider the delineation the icon on the left, and x on the right.

Part of me likes the freshening up. I won't quit using Firefox over these changes, I've been using it for 20 years now and won't be changing until I'm forced. There's still no other browser with a built-in search bar that also works correctly with a keyboard shortcut other than Firefox and Vivaldi. Vivaldi has everything I need in a desktop browser, it just isn't supported at all on iOS which is equally important for me these days. And honestly, Firefox is probably the only browser that isn't from Apple or Microsoft that I'd use. Otherwise I prefer something as important as a browser backed by a truly large organization. Microsoft Edge is really hard to beat in my view once you consider all the intrinsic qualities to it like support. I'll put it this way, no one is making a mistake using Safari or Edge.

I like most everything about Firefox, the browser hasn't ever been ruined, but you got to wonder if there's truly even a place for 3rd party browsers in this era. If I weren't a legacy user, I'd just use Edge and be happy not knowing what I'm missing out on with alternatives.

Post reply on HN