Live data from Hacker News

Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

unusualwhales.com

451–460 of 493 posts

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#451
post #15

> For example, Pelosi in Dec 22 was against more stimulus. Her husband buys deep ITM TSLA and AAPL calls that day. December 23rd, she is suddenly for stimulus again, with those same companies ralling 5%, giving her an instant +30 return. > Congressman Gottheimer is absolutely an incredible options trader. He’s been selling calls at peaks on $MSFT all 2021, & seemingly buying back the contracts on dips. This in blocks…

Wait until you see how much she got paid to build a few miles of railroad.

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#452
post #15

> For example, Pelosi in Dec 22 was against more stimulus. Her husband buys deep ITM TSLA and AAPL calls that day. December 23rd, she is suddenly for stimulus again, with those same companies ralling 5%, giving her an instant +30 return. > Congressman Gottheimer is absolutely an incredible options trader. He’s been selling calls at peaks on $MSFT all 2021, & seemingly buying back the contracts on dips. This in blocks…

Whatever the behind-the-scenes truth, I think the appearance of conflicting interests is a problem regardless. For a lot of elected offices and high public service positions, I think their wealth should be put into a blind trust, one constrained by law to buy broad, boring things like index funds. That would surely be a problem for some individuals. But I don't think it's a systemic problem. We only need to find 0.00…

The nature of politics tends to attract the very kind of people that you don't want in politics.

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#454
Elected officials of all stripes and all levels should have the same trading constraints employees of Wall Street banks have: -30 day lockup on all trades -DOJ should be listed as interested party on all House/Senate market participants.

Unfortunately, our DOJ has been working on fugazy matters while antitrust laws are ignored and obvious market manipulation offenses by elected officials are of no interes seemingly.

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#456
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, if you have better uses for the money, put it to work. Most people don't, so ingesting in the stock market is totally rational. At te very least with a good chunk of it. Again diversification is good.

> Most people don't This is the crux of the issue. If you have $100 million and you can't think of a single worthwhile use for any of it besides making more money, that's either a literally unbelievable lack of imagination, or incredibly cruel. It is so, so easy to do a huge amount of good with that much money. It's not easy to figure out how to do the most amount of good possible, that's probably an unsolvable probl…

I'm all for people donating money, but they don't have to. It's theirs and they get to do what they want with it, without the burkamans of the world guilt tripping them. If they want to invest their savings until such a time as they have something better to do with it, more power to them.

After all, you wouldn't want me telling you how to spend your money.

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#457
post #407
post #389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> half of the US is below average intelligence That is what average means. (Looks like we two are keeping it balanced!)

> > half of the US is below average intelligence > That is what average means. That is what median means.

bell curve

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

for that matter, day trading and technical analysis is literally just insider trading. This chart, based on some analysis of the way it's moved, with no interest in the metrics of the company itself, dictates buy or sell. Every 'Technical Trader' learns these 'indicators' and trades on them. It's just shadow insider trading under the guise of providing 'liquidity' but in reality just contributes to more volatility. B…

That's not what insider trading is. Insider trading is specifically using non-public information about a company to make investment decisions. Technical analysis generally uses only publicly available information; it's finding patterns in those publicly available data that can help you make investment decisions. I'm not saying it's socially useful; just that it is distinct from insider trading.

well... Kinda. Proprietary data feeds that you have to pay big money for is totally a thing. I wouldn't call that public information.

Additionally, with hft data speeds matter and exchanges only allow co-location of servers to 'premier firms'.

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> At this level of wealth, just making more money has no positive impact on anybody, even yourself. except that having capital makes it easier to gain more capital, so you could very well end up with more impact by aggressively investing for a few years before donating.

Ok, say you invest that $10 million and a year later it's grown to $12 million. That's a decent return, but what was the opportunity cost of investing in Microsoft instead of, I don't know, funding 100 people on GoFundMe who are going to die if they can't afford surgery? The US government uses ~$10 million as the value of a human life when they analyze the cost/benefit of various policies. And it's a compounding inve…

I totally agree with you -- I was trying to explain the thought process that I think is going on in some peoples' heads.

Re: Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

#460
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, if you have better uses for the money, put it to work. Most people don't, so ingesting in the stock market is totally rational. At te very least with a good chunk of it. Again diversification is good.

> Most people don't This is the crux of the issue. If you have $100 million and you can't think of a single worthwhile use for any of it besides making more money, that's either a literally unbelievable lack of imagination, or incredibly cruel. It is so, so easy to do a huge amount of good with that much money. It's not easy to figure out how to do the most amount of good possible, that's probably an unsolvable probl…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN