Live data from Hacker News

So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

cole-k.com

441–450 of 681 posts

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#441

Meta has spent $2B on verification lobbying. Very successfully it seems. In 1-2 years, you won't be able to browse the internet without scanning a body part and providing a ID for your ass. https://www.gadgetreview.com/reddit-user-uncovers-who-is-beh...

I would view a website that requires users to go through a lengthy verification process. Given all the astroturfing from companies and governments, this would give a bit of trust.

That's Facebook. How do you like it?

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#442

I think at this point I'm ready to give up on Reddit, most of my questions are already answered by LLM. And the discussions quality on Reddit are abysmal, its filled with bots.

> I think at this point I'm ready to give up on Reddit, most of my questions are already answered by LLM. That's a bizarre and self-sabotaging path to take. Almost all LLMs get a substantial portion of their knowledge from Reddit. In order to evaluate the quality of those LLM responses, you'll have to click through to the Reddit threads and critically evaluate the quality of the underlying discussions. If you just bl…

No new valuable training data has been created on Reddit since 2023.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#443

If you were using old.reddit.com then presumably you were viewing popular by default? In which case you have some alternatives: https://safereddit.com/ https://lemmy.today/?dataType=Post&listingType=All&sort=TopD... OR https://old.lemmy.world/?listingType=All&sort=TopDay https://piefed.social/ (more or less the same as above)

Lemmy's popularity comes in waves. I was hoping for the day that Reddit would shoot itself in the foot again, because Lemmy's traffic was going through a slump. I'm looking forward to a fresh new batch of new users, content and communities.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#444
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit has almost 20 years of comments. You could certainly argue that it's less true now that there's legitimate people commenting, but there are years old threads on there with very helpful and valuable information that you can only really find via some incantations of Google search.

Have you ever looked at an old reddit comment thread. + Hey how do you do thing? | -+ [deleted] | -+ Thanks, that's just what I needed.

Answered questions becoming unanswered is such an annoying thing. I'd prefer users who are willing to delete their comments day, weeks, months, years later to not reply at all and let someone else answer.

And why Reddit, or anybody else, allows modifying comments after such a long time is beyond me.

EDIT: These days there are even active users who are wiping their comment history on a regular basis. Very strange mindset.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#445

I think at this point I'm ready to give up on Reddit, most of my questions are already answered by LLM. And the discussions quality on Reddit are abysmal, its filled with bots.

I gave up on it years ago when they killed off 3rd party clients, I have to say it doesn't seem like I've been missing much. The rare occasion I do need to see something on it, it's just full of deleted accounts and comments. I do also love how VPNs get blocked but accessing it over tor is allowed (genuinely I think allowing access over tor is great, but it seems so antithetical to everything else they've done recent…

Reddit did reliably block Tor with 429 but no longer does.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#446
post #341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of the programming adjacent subreddits have been post after post of weekend vibe coded projects. It's become really exhausting how easy it is to turn out a new wheel that's going to get abandoned in a few weeks at best.

Admittedly, HN is suffering the same fate to some extent.

To some extent? It's most of the content!

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#447
post #293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're just trying to manufacture a reason to kill off old reddit. Someone internally clearly hates the fact that its still quite popular, despite all the efforts to make it unusable so far

New Reddit for my phone has decided to put a bottom popup forcing me to the app. The second old goes away I’ll never go that site again except for search results. I ADORE that a publicly traded tech giant is so fucking stupid.

this

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#448
post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The discussion quality is unbelievably shallow in most of the subreddits. Unless it's a niche and technical subreddit such as mathematical topics, bio science subtopic, the discussion is quite shallow and in some cases simply misinformed. For e.g., a recent question about "is this person racist?", everyone jumped on the bandwagon and said "yes!", "100%", "obviously" without citing any sources. They simply paraphrased…

The only subs of any value are the niche subs, hobby subs that show off creation, and city-sized geographical subs. Everything else is politics, trolling, ragebait or simple spam. So much spam.

In my experience most of the city subs have been overrun by political trolls too

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#449

As a heavy reddit user since the glorious Digg times... what's up with this "old reddit" thing? I vaguely remember some problems with new reddit initially. But the "new" frontend looks nice to me in all aspects. What am I missing?

The UX is horrendous, density of information is a fraction of what it was and the infinite scroll sucks

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>and city-sized geographical subs. lol. No. Every city sub is the EXACT same far left lunatic that needs to make everything about politics. Doesn’t matter if it’s a purple area, red, and reasonable-blue areas far reflected as bizarro versions of themselves if you go off their city reddits. You may not notice depending on your perspective.

It's not just leftists. It's polarization generally, with scale. The mid-range views leave. The extremes remain. Often a sub / moderator bias selects for one polar extreme or another. This is where HN's (generally) political-neutral moderator stance, maddening as it often is to both sides (see dang's many, many, many, many comments on perceived bias), seems to have largely succeeded. Neither side dominates, and the m…

HN definitely removes political extreme views.
Post reply on HN