Live data from Hacker News

Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

tim.blog

441–450 of 513 posts

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#441
I think this whole genre is an issue of theory of constraints.

-Before the internet, space to publish anything was scarce (and so were methods of finding specific information if it did exist), so newspapers/magazines were valuable and textbooks/guides were great media.

It was difficult to find extremely specific information because a lot of information was so niche it wasn't worth publishing, or because it wasn't worth the effort to find something SO specific.

-The internet made publishing space infinite and search easy, so specific information became super valuable, e.g. "how to do x in 5 steps" blogs. They architected information in ways that wouldn't have been worth publishing in a regional newspaper or small-circulation magazine, but was economically viable at worldwide scale and when publishing was free.

This is the era this article describes.

-Then everything went mainstream and the above production of content was often more frequently done by large companies, with bloggers and other individuals filling even smaller niches

-Now that LLMs have vacuumed all of that up and you can create even more specific content for free, instantly (e.g. you no longer need a generic tutorial on "how to start a business" but summon one that already knows your prior skills etc.)

This has made the previous era of "how-to" content less useful because you can decide whether you want expert/beginner/intermediate level content and what personality etc.)

Now the frontier is first-person narratives and opinions, because even specific information is no longer the constraint.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is the same thing with documentaries. Youtube killed them because it is just a faster delivery of knowledge and information. For super-specific questions chatbots are even faster.

Idk, the average youtube video repeats the same question five times, dragging shit out with filler as much as possible to reach the required 10 minutes to qualify for two ad runs. It's become a horrible race to the bottom in terms of quality in recent years, though unlike TV documentaries at least it's possible to skip to the conveniently marked highlight these days. There was this recent Tom Scott interview where he…

“And as for B, well, your guess is as good as mine”

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#443
post #440
post #434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The more reasonable dating coaches are still out there. They simply aren’t part of the mainstream advice. I really want to ask: what would their reputation be if they were mainstream, in your opinion? I find it to be a very interesting spot of culture and society, like at one point you had a bunch of guys who were dealing with the cognitive dissonance between what society asks of men and what society wants from them…

A lot of the accusations of misogyny were well founded, but there were also a lot of people who genuinely just did struggle with why they couldn't meet people, and who wanted to genuinely improve. I think effectively those coaches who worried most about reputations to a large extent pivoted from focusing on the dating aspect to more general self-improvement, where dating success might still get mentioned but without…

> A lot of the accusations of misogyny were well founded, but there were also a lot of people who genuinely just did struggle with why they couldn't meet people, and who wanted to genuinely improve.

Agreed

> and there are lots of ways of framing the non-manipulative, non-creepy parts of a lot of dating coach advice in ways that nobody would consider misoygynist.

Yea, agreed

One issue is that pickup artists always framed it as men seducing women. But quite frankly, most ideas would also work the other way around. I remember talking to some dating coaches who strongly disagree with me but they view women too much as women and men too much as men, whereas my view is that we’re humans first and our sex/gender second.

Viewing things in such a gendered way was a factor for misogyny.

Back in the day, I coached a woman to be better at dating. I taught her what I knew and she took her own spin on it and had tons of fun.

Just some examples as to what is interchangeable:

1. Being playful

2. Emotional intelligence

3. Good style

4. Cold approaching

5. Disqualification technique (e.g. what work do you do? I’m a hermit in the woods and sing to birds all day - when you are clearly not)

6. Open body language, and the concept of tonality, body language and non-verbal communication in general

7. Good logistics such as having a place of your own, moving a date to a second or nth location etc. (this just requires planning)

8. Being able to signal intent at the right time (I do it 10 to 60 minutes after when the playful vibe is clearly established)

Women can do these things too, and it works. This is just from the top of my dome. There are many more examples. Such as being optimistic, adventurous and genuinely yourself (I know sounds contradictory, it’s a long topic but yeah works for women who want to seduce men too).

I wouldn’t be surprised if all of this also works for gay/lesbian people but I never thought about that.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#444

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Self-help books are so often ridiculued, and that ridicule is often well merited. At the same time there was a self-help book that basically gave me a whole different outlook on life, and cured my depression over night. So I can't deny they have a place and can really help people.

Most of the effective self help advice is personal advice meets trust means relevance at that point in life. Same book can be ridiculed and appreciated by different people, sometimes even by the same person when they are in different stages of their life (especially if they have less self-awareness). "You already know whether you are in love or not, you just need to trust this voice." Depending on where you are in li…

"You already know" advice amplifies your existing belief. It's about taking a 60% confidence guess to a 95% confidence guess. Stated like that it becomes obvious that it's appropriate if someone vaguely suspects the correct thing, but dangerous if they vaguely suspect the wrong thing.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> video essays In the last few months, I have watched many YouTube videos from the Australia Broadcasting Corp (ABC) subtitled "If You're Listening" [1]. They are primarily about geo/political issues, but there are some odd-ball ones about Japanese land-use & development policy. I think that the production is very high quality. (1) They do they research. (2) They find lots of interesting funny old video clips. (3) Th…

They are provided for free because a quick scroll through the playlist shows they are soft propaganda tools for Australia's geopolitical interests. These video essays "explaining" geopolitics are the contemp version of Buggs Bunny and Donald Duck making fun of Japan and Germany.

What are Australia's geopolitical interests?

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#447
post #362

IMO the WORST thing you can use chat for is advice in a field you are unfamiliar with. It's way better at search and grunt work when you already know what you want. All IMO: Syncophancy (and in extreme cases AI psychosis) is a huge problem when you take advice from AI. It's risky to learn a new field as you often just fall for a superficial, glib explaination and just nod along without learning. AI will do that becau…

idk. it helped me fix my washing machine.

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you imagine the day when an AI/LLM-assisted tool can watch a YouTube video at super speed and then clip X% of the video to show you the best parts? I can see it coming. It might really hurt YouTube revenues. Recently, I had a similar idea when I tried to watch the TV series "SAS: Rogue Heroes". I quit after a few episodes because it was so damn slow. I spent most of each episode skipping pointless dialog and over…

There was a tivo competitor called ReplayTV that would record tv and then replay clipping out commercials. They got sued out of existence.

The trick is to use a hundred shell companies so they can't figure out who to sue. As I said recently... it seems like everything worth doing is illegal

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#449
post #421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mainly that the advice was more structured, maybe? Note that I was exercising before, only I didn't do it for health. But I also didn't suffer from any obvious problems. What I got out of every medical organisation in the world then is "You're fine. Don't worry about it." I was probably fine, but I'm even more fine now; I'm capable of doing more of the things I enjoy.

> What I got out of every medical organisation in the world then is "You're fine. Don't worry about it." This is alien to me, because for at least 50 years now, heart disease and diabetes has been at the forefront of basically every developed country’s health problems, for which the only solution proposed by all health authorities has been to eat less and healthier, and to do cardiovascular exercise almost every day.…

I think there's a bit of a "marketing" failure happening in this context.

I've been exercising for most of my life, I'm the guy that has been going to the gym since forever to many of my acquaintances, and so they have often talked to me about how they want to start exercising or how they are doing etc.

Nobody, and I mean nobody has ever said anything like "I'm so happy to decrease my risk of diabetes". My father stopped smoking and started riding a bike, motivated by cardiovascular health, what actually makes him happy though is to be able to go up the stairs without breaking into a sweat.

Ask anyone in a gym why they exercise, they will talk about health, just not in the way doctors do. The stick of "You will die in 20 years rather than 35" pales in comparison of the carrot of "you will feel better basically all the time"

Re: Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

#450
post #440

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of the accusations of misogyny were well founded, but there were also a lot of people who genuinely just did struggle with why they couldn't meet people, and who wanted to genuinely improve. I think effectively those coaches who worried most about reputations to a large extent pivoted from focusing on the dating aspect to more general self-improvement, where dating success might still get mentioned but without…

> A lot of the accusations of misogyny were well founded, but there were also a lot of people who genuinely just did struggle with why they couldn't meet people, and who wanted to genuinely improve. Agreed > and there are lots of ways of framing the non-manipulative, non-creepy parts of a lot of dating coach advice in ways that nobody would consider misoygynist. Yea, agreed One issue is that pickup artists always fra…

The funny thing is that a while after having spent time reading up on it but not really tried many of those techniques, I ran into a woman in a club who started running "textbook game" on me, and in that context reciprocating and trying out even techniques I'd never feel comfortable with on someone who didn't know what was going on was fun because I could tell she also immediately recognised it. It ended up being a fun dance of back and forth. The biggest problem with a lot of those techniques is when one side isn't aware - and of course that is often why they were being thought. But, yeah, the part you list are all definitely interchangeable.
Post reply on HN