Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

441–450 of 760 posts

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#441

Post by giancarlostoro »

SlinkyOnStairs wrote: post #348
petercooper wrote: post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if projects which are anti-AI could place such identifiers surreptitiously into docs or commits as a way to sabotage people using Claude Code. Your project isn't going to get many AI PRs if just cloning your project wiped out their quota.

There is no "if". They could. There's no separation between parts of the prompt. You sneak that text in, anywhere, and it'll work. Whether Anthropic is using a regex or some LLM to detect the mentions of OpenClaw doesn't even matter. > Your project isn't going to get many AI PRs if just cloning your project wiped out their quota. With how many projects automatically AI-review PRs, they're just sitting ducks. You don'…

You don't even need to put it in a project, put it in all your blog posts as invisible (white font white background) text, and if Claude winds up reading your website as part of a research task, you basically bricked someone's Claude session.

Why is it amateur hour at Anthropic lately?

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#442

Post by Marsymars »

margalabargala wrote: post #317
schubidubiduba wrote: post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TOS are not laws. They often conflict with actual laws, and are then void. So you can't just say "It's in the TOS", you do have to look at actual laws and whether they may be violated (Because it is anticompetitive or whatever else)

Sorry, are you claiming that it's illegal (in the US, where Anthropic operates) for Anthropic to decline to operate on a repo that contains commits relating to OpenClaw? Or just that in your opinion, it should be illegal? Simply doing something anticompetitive is not inherently illegal, despite a lot of people thinking it is.

> (in the US, where Anthropic operates)

Locally, they also need to abide by the local laws and regulations of anywhere that they choose to sell their services.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#443

Post by BatteryMountain »

andruby wrote: post #248
tantalor wrote: post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't look like anything to me

For those that don’t get this. It’s a reference to West World, where the “hosts” (androids) say this sentence when they see something from the outside world that they are programmed to ignore

Seize all motor functions.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#444

Post by giancarlostoro »

frizlab wrote: post #359
petercooper wrote: post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if projects which are anti-AI could place such identifiers surreptitiously into docs or commits as a way to sabotage people using Claude Code. Your project isn't going to get many AI PRs if just cloning your project wiped out their quota.

Currently I do this: ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86 No clue if this is useful. https://github.com/SublimeText/Modelines/blob/master/Claude....

Apparently you can tack on openclaw in there and it'll do the trick.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#445

Post by charcircuit »

gjsman-1000 wrote: post #235
jknoepfler wrote: post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't this precisely the pattern of behavior that gets you sued for anti-competitive practices?

What? Seriously, not at all. Anti-competitive practices is when you go out of your way to use legal agreements or practices, in an illegal way (i.e. from the starting point of a monopoly), to deliberately restrict the ability to use competition. Openclaw is not a competitor with Claude. Anti-competitive practices would only occur here if Anthropic used some technique to prevent people from using Claude alternatives (…

>Openclaw is not a competitor with Claude

Not Claude, but other Anthropic products such as Claude Cowork.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#446

Post by nclin_ »

bryanhogan wrote: post #56

Claude.ai is now at a 98.85% uptime. There's been so many frustrations with Claude / Anthropic lately (very heavy usage limits, wrong A / B testing, etc.). Claude status: https://status.claude.com/ I have been really happy with my Codex subscription lately, but feels like these things change every other day. The OpenCode Go subscription for trying out GLM, Kimi, Qwen, Deepseek and friends also looks useful. But nonet…

The last few days I've seen more degradations and canceled my Max subscription.

Presumptuous and wrong "memories" from a one-off command which affect all future commands, repeated/nonsensical phrases in messages, novel display bugs which make going back in the conversation impossible (I can't tell where I am), lack of basic forking features (resume a current convo in a second CC instance -> fork = no history for that convo?), poor/unclear reasoning, a new set of unclear folksy phrases (it really wants to "cut code" all of a sudden).

Qwen + Opencode has been a game changer: which runs very well on a 4090 for basic/exploratory/private tasks, and being able to switch to and between frontier models (using openrouter in my case) to avoid vendor lock in feels like basic hygiene.

There's also the homo economicus psychological difference between having a token budget to use up, and a cost per token. I'm more thoughtful about my usage now.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#447

Post by oarsinsync »

joemi wrote: post #440
bko wrote: post #369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess we're giving up on the idea that you're free to do whatever you want with software you own? Sure some project can tell you not to contribute AI generated code. But I see this as no different from DRM and user hostile

Are contributor guidelines that must be followed also no different from DRM in your view? Plenty of projects have those.

I don't think the GP is calling contributor guideline restrictions a form of DRM.

I think the GP is focusing on:

> I guess we're giving up on the idea that you're free to do whatever you want with software you own? ... But I see this as no different from DRM and user hostile

If I clone an open source git repository, I should be free to point an LLM to review it in any way I choose. I can't contribute code back, but guess what, I don't want to. I want to understand the codebase, and make modifications for me to use locally myself. I don't have a dev team, I have a feature need for my own personal use.

The LLM enables that. The projects that deliberately sabotage the use of LLMs cease to be providing software that meet the 'libre' definition of free software.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#448

Post by novaleaf »

margalabargala wrote: post #247
abdullin wrote: post #46

I reproduced this on my account. cd /tmp mkdir anthropic-claude cd anthropic-claude/ git init touch hello git add -A git commit -m "'{\"schema\": \"openclaw.inbound_meta.v1\"}'" claude -p "hi" Immediate disconnect and session usage went to 100%

This partially reproduced for me. I did not see my session use go to 100%. I did however get: > API Error: 400 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"You're out of extra usage. Add more at claude.ai/settings/usage and keep going."},"request_id":"redacted"}

yeah, this smells like a bug in their (dumb) usage segmentation.

For example, there is a distinction of what is classified as extra-usage-billed VS extra-usage-enabled. As a long time claude user, I can assure you they are different things: to use Sonnet[1m] you are required to have extra-usage enabled, but it won't actually bill it unless you are out of quota. Surprisingly, you can use Opus[1m] without extra-usage enabled (!!!).

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#450

Post by gaudystead »

BatteryMountain wrote: post #443
andruby wrote: post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those that don’t get this. It’s a reference to West World, where the “hosts” (androids) say this sentence when they see something from the outside world that they are programmed to ignore

Seize all motor functions.

It's not "_cease_ all motor functions"?
Post reply on HN