Live data from Hacker News

I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

twitter.com

441–450 of 1001 posts

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

* * *

The DoD’s spend on cloud contracts is measured in single-digit-billions per year. It’s peanuts compared to the hyperscalers investments in Anthropic. Think of it this way: each of the hyperscalers have built a handful of data centers specifically for government contracts. A handful each. Meanwhile, AWS and GCP have dedicated over 50 new data centers solely for Anthropic to train new models, and more were announced to…

[flagged]

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#442

The disconnect here for me is, I assume the DoW and Anthropic signed a contract at some point and that contract most likely stipulated that these are the things they can do and these are the things they can't do. I would assume the original terms the DoW is now railing against were in those original contracts that they signed. In that case it looks like the DoW is acting in bad faith here, they signed the original co…

Regardless of the original contract, it's entirely appropriate for a vendor to tell the customer how to use any materials.

Imagine a _leaded_ pipe supplier not being allowed to tell the department of war they shouldn't use leaded pipes for drinking water! It's the job of the vendor to tell the customer appropriate usage.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#443

So they are such a risk to national security that no contractor that works with the federal government may use them, but they're going to keep using them for six more months? So I guess our national security is significantly at risk for the next six months?

Dont forget Nvidia technology was condsidered too sensitive to be exported to China....until the Trump administration decided they could export it if they paid a 10% export tax.

Aren't export taxes against the US constitution?

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#446

This could kill Anthropic. The designation says any contractor, supplier, or partner doing business with the US military can’t conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Well, AWS has JWCC. Microsoft has Azure Government. Google has DoD contracts. If that language is enforced broadly, then Claude gets kicked off Bedrock, Vertex, and potentially Azure… which is where all the enterprise revenue lives. Claude canno…

I’m sure most of their revenue is large enterprise customers who serve government with their products - this looks very bad

That's what hegseth says, but the law doesn't really say that AFAICT.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a silly shibboleth, but I automatically ignore anyone who calls it the Department of War or Gulf of America. Hasn't steered me wrong yet. They're telling me they're the kind of people who only care about defending fascism.

Google Maps calls it Gulf of America, pretty difficult to ignore Google.

Only in America, in the rest of the world Google calls it "Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)".

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#448

Wow, and the only restrictions Anthropic asked for are (1) no mass domestic surveillance and (2) require human-in-the-loop for killing [1]. Those seem exceptionally reasonable, and even rather weak, lol :| [1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war

Their intention is to turn it against the American people. Hegseth literally wrote a book about eliminating democrats from the US, and this surprises people.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#449

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not doing 996 is a feature not a bug

Not when you want to win and compete with someone who does 996

Anyone who does 996 is being exploited, unless they're the actual boss, in which case they're the ones doing the exploiting if they're pushing 996 on their employees.

This is why 996 bosses think AI can replace their employees, because they already see the employees as robots, not humans.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#450

Good. I'd rather not have my favorite AI from a company working on AGI to have murder and spying in it's DNA. In fact, as a patriotic American veteran, I'd be ok with Anthropic moving to Europe. It might be better for Claude and AGI, which are overriding issues for me. Rutger Bregman @rcbregman This is a huge opportunity for Europe. Welcome Anthropic with open arms. Roll out the red carpet. Visa for all employees. Eu…

Do all of the employees want to move to Europe suddenly? Unless it’s the UK or Ireland, do they speak the local language? If it is the UK or Ireland, do they prefer the weather in California? Do they have children in school or in college locally? Do they have family they’d rather not move 9 time zones away from? Elderly parents they’re taking care of?
Post reply on HN