Live data from Hacker News

I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

thelocalstack.eu

441–450 of 516 posts

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#441

Ha. I was reading this and thought "euhhhh, I did not give all of that to verify my account". So I went to LinkedIn to check if I have the shield. I then saw - that I just have "work email verified" and that there is a Persona thing I was not even aware of - a post by Brian Krebs at the top of my feed, exactly on that topic: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bkrebs_if-you-are-thinking-ab...

> that I just have "work email verified" and that there is a Persona thing I was not even aware of

Good to know that work email verification doesn't involve Persona.

That seems like a reasonable middle ground. Work email is a much lighter ask than handing over government ID and biometrics.

Curious, does your verification status persist after you remove the work email (e.g., if you leave that employer)?

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That response reeks of astonishing arrogance. It doesn’t surprise me that nearly 50% of Americans voted for Donald Trump he perfectly embodies that mindset. Do you genuinely believe you are superior to the rest of the world? What you call “innovation” or a “better product” is often nothing more than the creation of dominant market positions through massive, capital deployment, followed by straightforward rent extract…

> That response reeks of astonishing arrogance. It doesn’t surprise me that nearly 50% of Americans voted for Donald Trump he perfectly embodies that mindset. Do you genuinely believe you are superior to the rest of the world? What you call “innovation” or a “better product” is often nothing more than the creation of dominant market positions through massive, capital deployment, followed by straightforward rent extra…

>why does the US create so much stuff that Europe doesn't?

because the "stuff" in question is social networks who live, as the name suggests, off network effects. To have a European LinkedIn would require everyone in Europe to switch at the same time. Which can be trivially arranged, we just would need the courage to ban LinkedIn and every other American social media company. We'd have a clone up and running in a month. You only need to look to China who did exactly this.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#444
post #348

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you say more? Why isn't it neutral or slightly positive? I would assume that a KYC provider would want to protect their reputation more than the average company. If I were choosing a KYC provider I would definitely want to choose the one that had not been subject to any privacy scandals, and there are no network effects or monopoly power to protect them.

> Why isn't it neutral or slightly positive? Because KYC is evil in itself and if the linked article does not explain to you why is that then I certainly cannot. > KYC provider would want to protect their reputation more than the average company False. It is exactly the opposite. See, there are no repercussions for leaking customers data, while properly securing said data is expensive and creates operational friction…

I want KYC. I want AML. I want reversible transactions. I also want all of those things to be well regulated by a responsive and reasonable regulatory body.

They may have cases where they break down, but their net social impact is positive.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#445
post #377

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Victim mentality Oh please.

He's right though. Blaming someone else for your own failures is victim mentality - regardless of whether they really are the cause or not. Notice how China managed to break free from US tech dominance, no matter how difficult it was, by making itself strong and capable instead of accepting helplessness which is victim mentality.

>Notice how China managed to break free from US tech dominance, no matter how difficult it was

They did this because in the Chinese narrative Americans are a bunch of hegemonic brutes and self sufficiency was a matter of survival. Europeans don't use LinkedIn because they're victimized, they use American products because there was a belief that the United States is a civilized country whose companies and government can be relied on.

That Americans of all people now adopt the rhetoric of the Chinese about themselves and Europe, which has some terrifying and unflattering implications about their own self image should make people think about what they're saying. Europe didn't go for a different route because of victim-hood, but because the rule of law and the so-called Western values do still mean something on the old continent.

If Americans now openly say, Europe you losers you should have treated us the way the Communist party told you to, fair enough but mind you that's how people talk who are at the end of their own civilization, I'm German I know the attitude very well.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> when they are only incentivized to lie, cheat, and steal The fact that they are allowed to do this is beyond me. The fact that they do this is destructive to innovation and I'm not sure why we pretend it enables innovation. There's a thousands multi million dollar companies that I'm confident most users here could implement, but the major reason many don't is because to actually do it is far harder than what those…

Because the liars who have already profited from lying will defend the current system. The best fix that we can work on now in America is repealing the 17th amendment to restrengthen the federal system as a check on populist impulses, which can easily be manipulated by liars.

  > Because the liars who have already profited from lying will defend the current system.
Okay? And so we just have to deal with it? Give up? Throw in the towel? Not push back?

  > repealing the 17th amendment
Did you read your first sentence?

*By your own logic,* the liars who have already profited from lying will appoint those who will help them defend the current system.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#447
KYC data is the most dangerous data that can leak right now. If your CC leaks, you will know almost immediately and can revoke it and generally will get your money back. Password leaks can be neutered with 2FA. Medical data leak can perhaps be used in a complex extortion, but generally for most people this data is worthless.

KYC data on the other hand allows third party criminals who have bought your KYC on the black market to perform money laundering in your name (by opening bank accounts) and taking debt in your name. Generally you won't even know this is happening until it's too late and debt collectors come. And it's not like you can revoke your biometrics/liveness check/selfie and who knows if revoking your passport/id card would actually work.

IMO it's much better if a dedicated KYC processor, like Persona, with actual security team/mindset, handles this rather than random website inside their zendesk instance. But there still needs to be extremely strict regulation surrounding this data.

Also while CC data will be getting less dangerous over time due to AI fraud detection and mandated 3DS, KYC data will IMO be getting more dangerous over time because more fintech/govtech will rely on it.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#448
post #339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would we believe they are deleted after processing and not shared with the government?

What's the government going to do with a picture of the ID they, themselves issued to you?

Keep in mind for most users of the service, the ID was not issued by the US government.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#449
I suddenly had my account locked down unless I provide my government ID, just like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44435997.

Never did LinkedIn state it was Persona carrying out the validation, and in the email they stated the data would be promptly deleted. I'm now learning this is not true; companies removed from LinkedIn store my data for however long they want.

I feel this is solid grounds for a lawsuit, particularly in states such as California.

Re: I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over

#450
I did that process on a whim after being buggered for weeks on end by LinkedIn. I immediately regretted it and realised that I had shared my private data for a fucking linkedin badge… I didn’t look into it back then but this article confirms my suspicions and dreaded feeling!
Post reply on HN