Live data from Hacker News

Just let me select text

aartaka.me

441–450 of 621 posts

Re: Just let me select text

#441

Ive asked this before with no answer: A browser (say, Firefox) is a "User Agent". Agents are supposed to act on our behalf, and in our best interests when ambiguities are present. So, why are OUR user agents acting on behalf of website operators and their admins and users, and not on our behalf? Having CSS that prevents usability shouldn't be implemented. Or it should be an easy toggle to turn on/off, without having…

Because browsers and their operators, like any other industry, over time morph to a shareholder driven mess that needs to constantly be integrating with feature/product X. If the same operator also controls the entire adspace in the web, and has significant impact/input on other connected media devices beyond webbrowsers, what incentive do they have to empower users to "ignore" content, be it ads, ai slop, bad UI? Th…

Still, it’s sad we’re in this timeline.

Re: Just let me select text

#442

Given that this page has the following styles which aren't applied anywhere else on the blog: body { -webkit-user-select: none; -webkit-touch-callout: none; -moz-user-select: none; -ms-user-select: none; user-select: none; } I think it's safe to assume that being unable to select text on this page is not unintentional, as several comments here assume, nor "ironic", but an intentional effort to demonstrate how annoyin…

You’re right with your analysis, but I still find this device ironic in addition to what you said.

Re: Just let me select text

#443
post #396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because people don't understand what a joke is sometimes, even on that's obvious like this.

Or some people just have a desire to vent of lots of that anger boiling inside them and are just looking for a excuse to shout at something ..

That I can relate to, and that’s how some of my blog posts get born. Like this one.

Re: Just let me select text

#444

Given that this page has the following styles which aren't applied anywhere else on the blog: body { -webkit-user-select: none; -webkit-touch-callout: none; -moz-user-select: none; -ms-user-select: none; user-select: none; } I think it's safe to assume that being unable to select text on this page is not unintentional, as several comments here assume, nor "ironic", but an intentional effort to demonstrate how annoyin…

I don't know why so many comments are discussing "if it's intentional troll or hypocrisy", when it takes 10 seconds to check one of the other blog posts and see if the text there is selectable :(

That’s a lot of work, and I don’t expect all readers to open more than one page on my blog. But yeah, great that it sparked some debate.

Re: Just let me select text

#445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google pixel devices have had this for years. It's one of the few things that keeps me glued to this platform. Just push the button to go to the task switch view and as long as the window preview thumbnail isn't blanked out, I can just get the phone to OCR any part of the screen in real time.

iPhone has had this for years.

Yeah, and I think it was there for longer than on Pixels.

Re: Just let me select text

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Apps" of this sort are absolutely "on the web", and generally use browser engines to display the content. The real distinction IMO is between using a locked-down mobile interface vs. a full browser on a computer with an OS and UI intended to let you have that control.

I can pretty much guarantee that an app like Bumble is not a webview wrapper.

You can never know nowadays. But yeah, it must be a native app, at least on iOS with its PWA-hostile policies.

Re: Just let me select text

#447
post #383

I have a habit of selecting and highlighting text on computer screens, while reading. I have no issues tracking lines usually, but somehow I still select and highlight. Maybe it is just easier to track lines this way. When I see some web page, that prevents this, then that website gets a -50 reputation score out of 100 in my book. So if the site is perfect in every other way (almost no site is) then -50 still makes i…

Well, yet another compulsive selector here, but: Similarly I get annoyed, if every pixel is some clickable action trigger. This is the worst. It permeates all kind of GUIs. Windows has this mini preview windows that pop up when you're hovering over the apps in the taskbar. Also if you accidentally hover over them , all the windows are minimized except the one previewed. Microsoft has systematically terminated every s…

> Using one Windows inside another (vbox) at work is causing me PTSD.

At one time in my life, I might have called you out for bad-taste hyperbole… but no, this kind of thing is genuinely traumatising. And that's ridiculous: what has the world come to, that desktop operating systems are giving people PTSD‽

Re: Just let me select text

#448

Given that this page has the following styles which aren't applied anywhere else on the blog: body { -webkit-user-select: none; -webkit-touch-callout: none; -moz-user-select: none; -ms-user-select: none; user-select: none; } I think it's safe to assume that being unable to select text on this page is not unintentional, as several comments here assume, nor "ironic", but an intentional effort to demonstrate how annoyin…

Yep, it's clearly deliberate. It's also annoying enough that I'm not reading the text of the blog. I hope the author doesn't have any point beyond: "it's annoying to disable text selection"

Lol, that’s a good proof for my point. And a fun one at that! Thanks.

Re: Just let me select text

#449

Given that this page has the following styles which aren't applied anywhere else on the blog: body { -webkit-user-select: none; -webkit-touch-callout: none; -moz-user-select: none; -ms-user-select: none; user-select: none; } I think it's safe to assume that being unable to select text on this page is not unintentional, as several comments here assume, nor "ironic", but an intentional effort to demonstrate how annoyin…

Nice catch. Luckily I can use uMatrix to disable css and select and copy the post. Oddly the selection is transparent. Firefox Android. > I’m lonely. Like everyone-ish else. Naturally, I’m on Bumble

There are many ways to bypass that. User scripts and user styles too. But the point is delivered: one can disable selection, with just a couple of lines of CSS/JS, and cause a lot of pain for the reader.

Re: Just let me select text

#450

Given that this page has the following styles which aren't applied anywhere else on the blog: body { -webkit-user-select: none; -webkit-touch-callout: none; -moz-user-select: none; -ms-user-select: none; user-select: none; } I think it's safe to assume that being unable to select text on this page is not unintentional, as several comments here assume, nor "ironic", but an intentional effort to demonstrate how annoyin…

Within seconds of opening the article, I tried selecting text, and upon realizing that I couldn't, I chuckled, knowing that it had to be intentional.

It was.
Post reply on HN