I could never justify getting an iMac. All the downsides of a laptop & desktop in one; not upgradeable and not portable. Leaves me wondering how many of these Apple actually sell. A Mac Mini with a separate screen feels like it makes far more sense.
New iMac with M4
441–450 of 1001 posts
Re: New iMac with M4
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Studio Display is priced as if it's an iMac. It's insane that we've had retina displays for over a decade, and Apple still seems to be more-or-less the only game in town for a 5k 27" display.
At one point there were about six manufacturers (though I think it was all various grades of the same panel). They just didn’t sell.
On one hand, companies willing to spend more than $250 on monitors will rather give you a 32" ultra-wide, because that's more useful to the typical office monkey worker.
On the other, the PC enthusiast customer base is almost synonymous to gamers, who'd rather want high refresh rates than a silly 5K resolution they cannot use.
Re: New iMac with M4
#443Re: New iMac with M4
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see lots of people in this thread mentioning this, but am confused. I've never seen a lighting port on an Apple computer- only on iphones and ipads, and the cables that come with those are USB-C on the other end. Haven't all Apple computer accessories been USB-C for almost a decade now?
The past: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102292 > Recharge the built-in battery in your Apple keyboard, mouse, or trackpad [...] To charge your device's battery, connect a Lightning to USB cable to its Lightning port, The future: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/10/apple-introduces-new-... > Every iMac comes with a color-matched Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse or optional Magic Trackpad, all of which now feature a…
Re: New iMac with M4
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that is annoying. There’s also such a massive price difference between 4K and 5K monitors. I’ve decided just to accept 4K everywhere because it’s so much cheaper. But I would consider getting a 5K iMac.
> Yes, that is annoying. There’s also such a massive price difference between 4K and 5K monitors. Perhaps check out the Asus PA27JCV: 27" at 5120x2880.
Re: New iMac with M4
#446I am not building LLMs on my computer (I wish :)) but I do use my iMac for both work and photography. Lightroom slugs big time on my 2019 iMac. My dream spec for the next iMac would be:
- bring back the 27" form factor
- dumb down use as monitor. My work computer has disabled file & screen sharing so current methods dont work. I just want to plug my work macbook using a cable or wireless and use the imac as a display.
Re: New iMac with M4
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Studio Display is priced as if it's an iMac. It's insane that we've had retina displays for over a decade, and Apple still seems to be more-or-less the only game in town for a 5k 27" display.
I will never purchase the Studio Display on principle. It's an idiot product.
Re: New iMac with M4
#448I'd love a bigger/better screen on these, specifically an ultrawide variety. An iMac Pro with an 8k ultrawide would be a near-instant purchase for me. I find the ultrawide form factor so good for productivity. I love the apple "it just works" approach to their hardware, so if something was fully integrated I'd jump on it immediately.
Today I use a 49" CRG9, but the input and connection setup is somewhat finicky. Not a huge blocker, but it would be lovely to be able to simplify.
Re: New iMac with M4
#449Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great. But plenty of consumers disagree with you, which is why this product exists. Not everything you see is designed to be useful for you specifically
> plenty of consumers disagree with you What do you mean? This was just announced, no? Are there any sales/pre-order figures already? Also, how would you even go about analyzing the counterfactual of whether the number of people who would buy this spec are "plenty" compared to the number who would have bought a spec with more RAM had it been available?
Re: New iMac with M4
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's worse: Any file you open results in phoning home, Intelligence or not, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25074959
That’s overstating what happened there and what was sent. OCSP validation happened only for signed executables and the only bit of information is the hash of the developer certificate being verified, which was not logged in conjunction with your IP. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/11/mac-certificate-chec... Typically when there are concerns about phoning home it’s both more detailed information and something bei…