Live data from Hacker News

Moments in Chromecast's history

blog.google

441–450 of 609 posts

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#441
post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But many, many more than have heard of Google TV Streamer.

I think that's the point of: > one that will be very visible next to a TV, and not out of sight behind it like its predecessor. You're now advertising to anyone who visits your home.

That doesn't require changing the branding.

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#442

They also announced Google Streamer, which is just Google Chromecast but more expensive I guess, and also with the Nest technology for smart home stuff, which they also killed iirc. I have to say, I don't really see this product strategy as being good, or working. Google's product is just a mess, they are nearing Microsoft levels of incoherence. When you compare Google with Apple, it's such a night and day experience…

It has Android TV, direct competitor to Apple TV.

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#443
post #434

musing: It feels like Google has a reputation of creating a bunch of products and killing them off within 3-5 years. It seems like this helps with initial adoption of the product (backed by Google!) but erodes trust in the brand every time they axe a cult-favorite ("why would I invest time in ${x} when they'll probably just kill it off in a couple of years anyway..?") Would it be better if Google launched these produ…

Critically, the replacement, here, is 3x more expensive vs https://www.amazon.com/Chromecast-Google-TV-Streaming-Entert...

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#444
post #424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My Vizio TV calls it SmartCast. I just Airplay to it. I didn't realize until I just googled it that Chromecast is basically Airplay for Android.

Other way around; Chromecast beat Airplay to market by like four years I think. But yes, they're very comparable technologies.

According to Wikipedia, AirPlay was 2010 (and preceded by AirTunes in 2004); Chromecast 2013.

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#445

I got a free Chromecast ultra when I got a free Google Stadia box kit a few years ago. I didn’t use the Chromecast ultra much but I thought it was pretty neat. Kinda sad to see it go. Honestly the Google Stadia controller is probably the most comfortable and well designed controller I’ve used. I still have it and use it for PC gaming stuff. I don’t play video games much anymore so I don’t know if the other controller…

I find it funny that Google managed to sell you not one but two products in the same box that they unceremoniously discontinued. At least it looks like your Chromecast will continue to work for a while.

[dead]

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#446
post #424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My Vizio TV calls it SmartCast. I just Airplay to it. I didn't realize until I just googled it that Chromecast is basically Airplay for Android.

Other way around; Chromecast beat Airplay to market by like four years I think. But yes, they're very comparable technologies.

I had an AirPort Express back in 2004 timeframe that was precursor to Airplay that did beat Chromecast by close to 10 years with AirTunes. AirPlay came out in 2010. Then, in 2017, Apple released AirPlay 2.

Chromecast first gen was in 2013.

Apple actually beat Google on this one in terms of time.

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#448
post #24

Wow, even for Google, this seems like an exceptionally well-liked and popular brand name and device to kill. The replacement ("Google TV streamer") seems to be a quite different device – most importantly, one that will be very visible next to a TV, and not out of sight behind it like its predecessor. For anyone not particularly interested in having "AI" in their streaming stick (and this being Google, surely that wil…

> an exceptionally well-liked and popular brand name I don't think so at all. I'm not sure if anyone I know outside of tech has ever even heard of Chromecast. It was never super popular. While every single one of them knows what an Apple TV is, and they know what the Chrome browser is. The replacement makes much more sense. It's just branded as Google, and what it does -- it's a TV streamer. The branding tells you th…

My almost 70 year old parents knows what Chromecast is because we owned one before.

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#449

They also announced Google Streamer, which is just Google Chromecast but more expensive I guess, and also with the Nest technology for smart home stuff, which they also killed iirc. I have to say, I don't really see this product strategy as being good, or working. Google's product is just a mess, they are nearing Microsoft levels of incoherence. When you compare Google with Apple, it's such a night and day experience…

Apple makes fancy five-course dinners for the wealthy. Google throws half-cooked ramen at the wall for the masses. It's not terrible, but you have to finish eating it before it falls off. Your favorite flavor won't be there next time, and they might be serving burritos instead, but at least your loyalty card still works.

$99 (the new hotness) is a LOT of burritos, vs a $30 chromecast (the old busted).

I feel like I am the product.

Re: Moments in Chromecast's history

#450
post #434

musing: It feels like Google has a reputation of creating a bunch of products and killing them off within 3-5 years. It seems like this helps with initial adoption of the product (backed by Google!) but erodes trust in the brand every time they axe a cult-favorite ("why would I invest time in ${x} when they'll probably just kill it off in a couple of years anyway..?") Would it be better if Google launched these produ…

I’m not following how this reputation would help initial adoption. Isn’t that reputation a big component of why Stadia failed?
Post reply on HN