Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm certain that they will soon release anything that promises more subscriptions. ChatGPT for Family, ChatGPT for Gov, and so on...
ChatGPT for Kids™
“The Diamond Age: Or, A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer”
ChatGPT for Teams
441–450 of 453 posts
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#442I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…
Can't you just share the login details?
Sharing the same space and turning off/on the custom instructions is also very annoying.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#443I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…
Bing's version can search the web.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
The more I think of it the more I realize how enormous an impact this could have
You mean the children grow up loving the GPT more than their parents?
They already love their TV, GameBoy and smart phone more than their parents.
(Deliberately using anachronistic examples here. The issue has been with us for a while.)
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
Converging threads here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38956734 tldr: power (or if you want, impact) is the linear dimension, likelihood adds a second dimension to the plane of trust.
In practice, likelyhood directly correlates with power. Perhaps there is causation (power corrupts?)
Some people are more responsible than others.
For example, one's spouse typically has a lot of power, but hopefully a low likelihood in practice.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#446Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is that truly interesting? OP does not have to care about what AI think of him. OP does notnhave to care about accidentally offending or hurting AI either. Open does nor have to care about whether AI finds him silly or whatever. Normal humans care about all of those with their families.
AI is a tool controlled by people. In this case, people who are not OP.
So? That doesn't invalidate the point of the comment you replied to.
To give another example: The cashier at the supermarket knows when I'm buying condoms, but that doesn't mean I want to tell my parents.
And neither would I want to know as a parent, when or whether my kids order bondage gear on Amazon.
It's not just about my information going to other people, but also keeping certain information of other people from reaching me.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until people decide to boycott services where privacy is opt-in, nothing will change.
Maybe the EU should fine them like a billion dollars a month until it becomes opt-in.
Because the EU knows better about this kinds of things, then the people who build and use these?
Just like the EU knows better about what chargers people should use than customers and engineers? Such wise bureaucrats!
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#448I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…
Agreed on the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web. This feature single-handedly makes ChatGPT a very potent Google search alternative but without the dreaded advertisements.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#449I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…
Can't you use the same account on multiple phones though? I thought this is a no brainer.
As a general rule, I don’t share account access. I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve made an exception to that rule and it was always for something relatively benign like Spotify. Privacy isn’t the only reason to avoid sharing, either.
I don’t even like that when my family picks up the remote, Apple TV assumes it’s me using the TV. They watch something and mess up my Up Next history and recommendations. I wish it supported using a PIN. I’ve thought about getting rid of the remote to force everyone to use their phone as a remote, because then it detects who is using it and automatically switches accounts. But that means everyone has to have an iPhone and have their phone charged, etc. Getting rid of the remote just for my convenience seems too inconsiderate.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a custom GPT for telling my 3 year old bedtime stories. It's super cute to listen to the two of them collaborate back and forth where my kid will add new characters (friends from school, or stuffed animals) and new wacky twists to their adventures, and the storyteller GPT will come up with a new revised version. It would be pretty rad if she could just have the app on her tablet with a family plan. She doesn't…
ummm how do i get this? i've got a 5, 3, and 1 year old and would love this
We just do it from the ChatGPT app on Android.