Live data from Hacker News

It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

blog.robinhood.com

441–445 of 445 posts

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#441
post #434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A borrower who defaults will have the lender come after him not just for the principal, but also for the accrued interest, with the full support of the law. You have a very narrow understanding of loans. In fact, creditors lose money on loans all the time. Borrowers routinely escape paying out the entirety of their loans. > Incidentally, the Quran addresses your very claim that interest is the same as trade: https:…

> In fact, creditors lose money on loans all the time. Borrowers routinely escape paying out the entirety of their loans. Just because some lenders lose money, does not make the contract any less predatory or immoral. That's like saying that there are some people who don't wear seatbelts and make it out of accidents without issues. The very fact that the US has trillions of dollars of student and auto and mortgage de…

Dude how do you even survive without participating in ANY interest? If you don’t have a mortgage, you must rent. That property was bought with a loan. You have any bank account or investments? Those institutions provide loans. Did you get an education? How did you pay for it? You gotta be filthy rich to afford all those things in cash.

I’m just amazed that people actually believe what you’re saying. I would never want to live in a society where I am forced to accept charitable scraps from the wealthy elite.

Tangibility is a dumb argument. The car and the property or whatever are being rented out for a profit INCLUDING maintenance costs. Money depreciates and the lender absorbs risk. There’s opportunity cost with money.

Loans can absolutely be predatory! There should be absolutely be proper regulation. But your suggestion that ALL interest is evil just tells me you have no idea how the world works.

You use products and services from companies which use interest. Your government uses interest. It’s all around you.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I’m a farmer that has corn crops to sell, I receive immediate renumeration for production in the future (in the simplest contracts) if I don’t produce anything at all, I literally take the money and run, it what happens? What about if hail destroys my entire crop? What if it destroys half my crop but I claim it destroys all of it? There are definite moral differences between those cases but in operational terms it…

> I literally take the money and run, it what happens? That can happen regardless, there are many scammers who did this with or without shorting. Shorting is not required to keep things in check, that's the job of law enforcement. Taking a step back it's really quite simple. Shorting is literally a bet that provides no value other than that some people will profit at the misery of others. This is unethical and immora…

I accept that you and I have different moral positions. Mine is that a market without shorting is a fallacy.

That said, you are required to explain crop insurance in your world view. It is a fundamental part of modern agriculture. One I think of as existential. It’s a short position. If your religion doesn’t allow it I won’t argue. Similarly I won’t argue with Shakers who don’t believe in procreation.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#443
post #441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In fact, creditors lose money on loans all the time. Borrowers routinely escape paying out the entirety of their loans. Just because some lenders lose money, does not make the contract any less predatory or immoral. That's like saying that there are some people who don't wear seatbelts and make it out of accidents without issues. The very fact that the US has trillions of dollars of student and auto and mortgage de…

Dude how do you even survive without participating in ANY interest? If you don’t have a mortgage, you must rent. That property was bought with a loan. You have any bank account or investments? Those institutions provide loans. Did you get an education? How did you pay for it? You gotta be filthy rich to afford all those things in cash. I’m just amazed that people actually believe what you’re saying. I would never wan…

> If you don’t have a mortgage, you must rent.

That's what me and many many other people do.

> That property was bought with a loan.

Not necessarily. But I do my part of not participating in the system, that's the least I can do. Similar to how boycotts happen, if enough people partake, change will come, until then, we stick to our values.

> You have any bank account or investments?

Yes, but I don't have a savings account.

> Did you get an education? How did you pay for it?

Fortunately, I didn't go to college in the US where the student loan industry is out in full force. There are other countries where college is affordable, and for people who can't afford it, provide true student aid. Not "student aid" as in federal loans, student aid where the college works with the individual person depending on his or her family's situation to work out a solution, including discounts.

Also, let's take a step back. Just why are colleges so unaffordable in the US? Easy loans play a big role. The universities see that there is easy money to be had, so they up their prices under false premises. It's basically supply and demand, where the supply is poor folks being pushed to take on crushing debt. It's a very parasitic cycle.

> I would never want to live in a society where I am forced to accept charitable scraps from the wealthy elite.

That's not what I said, it's a strawman fallacy. I said that in the Islamic position, loans are only done as an act of charity. However, Islam heavily encourages people to work and self sustain: https://sunnah.com/riyadussalihin:296. Where does it say to sit back and rely on charity?

The government has a responsibility to provide stable conditions and tackle issues like unemployment. This has nothing to do with interest.

> Money depreciates

Because of interest that the government takes on, forcing it to print more money to devalue the currency, see how this all works out?

Renting and loaning money are fundamentally different. Show me any car rental agreement that goes on for 30 years like a mortgage. That's just one difference.

> But your suggestion that ALL interest is evil just tells me you have no idea how the world works.

I do, and I can't help but be amazed and saddened that people keep crying at the many economic issues and crises that keep happening, not realizing that interest is at the center of the entire mess.

> You use products and services from companies which use interest. Your government uses interest. It’s all around you.

I do not deny it. All I can do is make people aware of the dangers, and that because interest is so prevalent, many of the problems we see today are going to stay until that changes: https://sunnah.com/mishkat:2818. Today, we are all affected by the dust of usury even if we don't partake in it.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#444
post #415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The entire operating procedure of security exchanges is a series of terrible ideas that exists in it's current form because it allows the most wealthy participants to maintain advantage. Latency arbitrage shouldn't exist, as one example. There are no sound explanations of why it must be allowed, which leaves greed as the only plausible one. We dedicate a lot of talented people and expensive equipment to fleecing each…

So the future gaps up in Chicago. What happens to the price of the etf trading in NJ afterwards and how do you eliminate latency arbitrage?

I like the IEX method of introducing a minimum latency and don't see why every exchange shouldn't do this. Selling retail trader order flows should be regulated out of existence, too.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#445
post #436
post #426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why else would they need an emergency $3.4B fund raise?

To keep up their margin requirements to allow GME trading. If they had kept blocking GME buying, they wouldn't have needed the extra funds, but also would've pissed off their clients even more.

But they did block GME buying anyway.
Post reply on HN