I’m starting to think that this could actually be good news for left-leaning people. It’s entirely possible that separated from the people they usually fight against, and isolated in their own platform, conservative voices, people who have made careers out of rhetorical conflict, will begin to fight among themselves. and this can only benefit the left. It’s also very possible that Parler will only go uncensored for s…
Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
441–450 of 889 posts
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've long held the opinion that Twitter and Facebook are just content in the medium, a bit like complaining about Sky, CNN or Fox on TV without looking at television itself and the impact it had on communication. The internet has brought communication to everyone that travels at incredible speed. This has the effect of causing emotive responses, rather than reasoned. Requires no effort at all to respond, and encourag…
Increasingly, the medium is the tribe. It’s not clear there are solutions to this because aligning on tribal beliefs is how we evolved to survive!
Twitter isn't making good decisions. The killed Vine and gave Musicaly and then TikTok oxygen. Their censorship is giving rise to competitors.
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#443Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suspect we will continue to see services that unbundle social media's hottest topics. Social media may have created an outrage economy -- a subset of the attention economy. But like ebay, craigslist, etc, the social media platforms' broad focus means their product can't specialize when strong trends emerge. The outrage will be unbundled by niche companies. I actually think this is a good thing. Seeing conspiracy th…
I'm honestly not sure how I feel about it. On one hand, I agree there is a positive to isolating the worst of social media off on a separate site. On the other hand, we're (maybe) just starting to see Facebook etc take some action on the worst elements of social media. This subverts that and makes it harder for Facebook to take further action in the future: shareholders will rightfully ask "what if you lose even more…
In 2-4 years' time, we'll have an even bigger festering cesspool of self-reinforced beliefs than ever before, and an more difficult time having rational discourse among our society about how to run it.
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agree, we will likely end up with right leaning town square and left leaning town square. And because every company seems to think they need to pick a side on political topics, it may extend beyond speech platforms. For instance I wouldn't be surprised if at one point conservative leaning viewers would migrate away from the likes of netflix for been fed up of being preached woke catechism in every TV show. And perhap…
Netflix consumption is 90% from recommendations page right? So they could segregate every side into their own little recommendation bubble, if they have the content range for it. Seems to work for youtube.
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm honestly not sure how I feel about it. On one hand, I agree there is a positive to isolating the worst of social media off on a separate site. On the other hand, we're (maybe) just starting to see Facebook etc take some action on the worst elements of social media. This subverts that and makes it harder for Facebook to take further action in the future: shareholders will rightfully ask "what if you lose even more…
Inevitably these kinds of safe spaces for hate speech lead to hate crimes: https://www.wired.com/story/pittsburgh-synagogue-shooting-ga... As long as the FBI are aware and can prevent these things, I suppose it's a nice honeypot, but if not then it's a literal weaponization of social media.
I'm just not quite sure the case has been convincingly made that internet cess pools generate crime that would't otherwise happen. I could probably be convinced otherwise, but I'm not sure.
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#446It’s worth noting that the first thing Parler did was start censoring anyone unsupportive of their form of conservatism. They’re not offering freer speech, they’re offering a safe space. Maybe that’s a seller, maybe it’s not, but it’s an important distinction. This is really just /r/conservative taken to its logical conclusion.
I was banned from r/conservative in a discussion about trump handling the coronavirus seriously. I posted a timeline of quotes from him "only 15 cases soon to be none etc" indicating he had not taken it seriously early. Banned after that. Which is fine, I feel that people should be free to form any clubs/groups they want.
At some point we'll need to have a psychological nuclear weapon disarmament... the question is when and how, not if.
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
2020, or more likely 2016 will perhaps be seen as a turning point in the fortunes of the US Republic, when the democracy began to unravel, the law was used as a weapon against enemies, and the rule of law was replaced by mob rule with different factions warring in the streets. The parallels between the US at this moment and pre-war Europe or Rome at the time of the Catiline conspiracy are striking - the centre cannot…
> the democracy began to unravel, the law was used as a weapon against enemies, and the rule of law was replaced by mob rule with different factions warring in the streets. I think a lot of those are good things and things we’ve been taught to over-value, without regard for their dangers and without an appreciation for the attendant responsibilities. The country was founded with a HEAVY skepticism of democracy. It al…
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#448When "free speech" is the primary selling point of a social media website, it tends to only attract people who feel slighted by the platform they're migrating from. Unfortunately this has the opposite effect of Parler's stated goal of being "the world's town square" since it simply isn't attractive to people with opposing views of those who did move. I think free speech is important and I think that social media plat…
I haven't seen a lot of evidence of this. If anything, it's the opposite. For example, David Pakman, Youtube political pundit and liberal grifter, joined Parler (I think just because Parler's CEO offered $20k to the first progressive with >50k twitter followers to signup) and he received very kind comments from people who largely dislike his politics.
https://parler.com/profile/dpakman/posts
Naturally, despite the warm welcome, Pakman never used the site. Because like most leftists, he's not interested in freedom of speech or reaching out to new audiences. He knows who his audience is, which are fringe leftists who hate anything like Parler, so he knows he has nothing to gain by using it.
Re: Conservatives flock to Parler, claiming censorship on Facebook and Twitter
#449Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am not sure that letting people exist in their own self-validating echo chamber is a good thing.
You make it sound that it was not always a thing.