Live data from Hacker News

Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

npr.org

441–450 of 809 posts

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#441
post #364
post #295

Anybody who thinks they know for sure that slack can't possibly be worth $16B should go back and read some threads from around the Facebook IPO (like this one https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4320585 ). It's very easy to write reasonable sounding things - making accurate predictions about the future is much harder.

Yeah, I'm going to go out on a limb here and venture a guess that Slack is going to do very well for itself, though it may dip and swoon over the next couple years before it reaches that point. An even more applicable comparison is the HN thread about the Dropbox announcement. "What? This is just [IRC|rsync] with gimmicky bells and whistles."

Yeah. Twitter is 'just' a one-line text field and a page where you can read what other people have entered in that text field. But there's something more to its success than just that bit that any newbie web developer could clone in an afternoon.

And even though blogging, threaded forums for discussion, chat rooms, email, etc. all already existed, it still has been enormously successful despite seemingly being drastically inferior to any of them in every way.

Things don't have to be better or even good to succeed, they don't even have to be difficult to clone. A bit of luck at the right time followed by a snowball effect and they can be huge. $28 billion for a textfield? Sure, why not?

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#442
Next >$16B opportunity: bring something close to Slack, but that actually works, to China.

China is chat-first culture, but neither DingDing, nor Wechat Work achieved the status that Slack has in the US/EU.

Problems with Slack in China: it's often blocked, it's unbearably slow, the apps are not in the stores, it's Chinese search is lacklustre, it's UI is centered on "longer" messages but Chinese language is very short so it could be optimized somehow.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#444

Congratulation to them. I think what they did is absolutely amazing and will be seen retrospectively as one of the biggest fads of history. - They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate. - They managed to change chat from a set of open protocols to a single closed app terribly written in JS. - They managed to make a lo…

The world deserved an upgrade to IRC, embracing openness.

Instead we got Slack.

At least its success made developers take Electron seriously for desktop apps.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#445
post #435

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can jump in and answer a co-worker that had a question when I'm available Isn't what you are describing the de-facto use case of a mailing list?

Not when I have to keep sorting my mailing lists into its own "label/category/folder/whatever your e-mail client calls it" on a sidebar so I can keep track of activity happening in which mailing list. In Slack or any IRC-like chat I can keep track of the channels that interest me, I keep track of live operations, my team's public channel to see if there are stakeholders having issues with our systems, our private cha…

> Not when I have to keep sorting my mailing lists into its own

There's a field on emails called subject.

Linux kernel is still developed using mailing list, I can imagine only a few things harder than that, still the kernel team manages to work on it just fine, without being in the same physical space.

Channels are just another way of labeling stuff...

> (even more when I'm working from home)

emails have been distributed, async and remote-aware since the 60s.

I'm really genuinely curious to understand why people keep making this point, while that's one of the most irrelevant feature of Slack.

I'm not saying email is perfect, just saying that your points are not a unique feature of slack, anyone of them have existed for decades.

> Yes, e-mail could be used for all of that, it would also make my inbox completely useless.

Just like channels on Slack after a while.

BTW https://www.mattermost.org/ offers the same features Slack offers, but I guess people are not switching because mattermost is not a recognized brand.

Just like people don't buy Nike shoes to ditch them for equally comfortbale but brandless flea market shoes.

It's a shame that tech people are so fashionable.

EDIT: formatting

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#446

Congratulation to them. I think what they did is absolutely amazing and will be seen retrospectively as one of the biggest fads of history. - They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate. - They managed to change chat from a set of open protocols to a single closed app terribly written in JS. - They managed to make a lo…

I see this complaint a lot, and I'm very sensitive to dopamine addiction myself so perhaps a few of my tips can help someone else make Slack less frustrating: 1. use /mute judiciously. especially on the main chats. only unmute important "#500" style channels. People immediately learn to @you when relevant. 2. disable notifications for everything on mobile: DMs, @here, @channel, @yourname, anything. No notifications w…

Just wanted to add to this to say that you can use shift-esc to clear all notifications in a workspace.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#447

Congratulation to them. I think what they did is absolutely amazing and will be seen retrospectively as one of the biggest fads of history. - They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate. - They managed to change chat from a set of open protocols to a single closed app terribly written in JS. - They managed to make a lo…

As a long-time IRC fan (I found many important persons in my life there!), I'm also a bit salty that open protocols didn't triumph and so many people salivate about features of Slack that were already in IRC in the nineties. But I don't get the horror stories about Slack poisoning work culture, I haven't experienced them.

At my workplace, we are a team of 7 (in a research project, it's academia but I don't think our way of organizing things is too different from a small startup), we have been using Slack for like a year and we have a sane relationship with it. Yesterday I think there were like 2 or 3 messages in our Slack, no more were needed. At other points (with looming deadlines, etc.) there is more activity, but it's always activity related to work that needs to be done, and my feeling is that it mostly reduces the amount of email, and sometimes also substitutes private messaging that some of us were using for work-related issues. Which is a plus for work culture, because we keep work and leisure separated. And as there are no notifications outside working hours, I think it has actually been positive for work-life balance, compared to using email or other messaging systems.

I don't know if it's a matter of team size (I can imagine that Slack may be more prone to becoming a behemoth in a huge team?), the personalities of the people using it, or that companies/teams where Slack is problematic already had a problematic work culture in the first place. Maybe it also helps that we don't have the paid plan at my team, so since logs are not stored, we use it for immediate teamwork and we instinctively shift to email or other means for important stuff that needs to be on record or consulted later. But for whatever reason, for us it hasn't become a growing monster. I'm curious about the factors that make it a blessing or a curse.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#448
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and they didn't need to bend or break laws to succeed. I agree. There is no law against half-assed, bloated Electron based desktop software that can bring even recent hardware to its knees.

Why does anyone use the app instead of the site?

Why would I hide my chatrooms in several browser tabs? Sounds maddening.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#449
It's pretty hilarious that first Stewart Butterfield tried to make an MMO (Game Neverending), failed at that, and ended up making a fortune on the spinoff, Flickr. Then he tried to make another MMO (Glitch), failed at that, and ended up making a fortune on the spinoff, Slack.

I hope he tries to make another MMO.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#450
post #372

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They managed to disturb millions of worker to an "attention driven" work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate. I see where you're coming from. But anecdote time. The immediate communication fixed something for us which would previously be a more disruptive tap on the shoulder, or alternatively an only once a day processed e-mail. Slack gave our devs time to finish their thought,…

What previously was a tap on the shoulder is now a message and a tap on the shoulder after three minutes if there is no reply. Slack has become the worst possible amalgamation of email and telephone. When previously minor things were discussed asynchronously over mail, only major and immediate issues warranted a phone call. Now all kinds of noncritical correspondence gets pushed to an instant messenger application, w…

Do people really do that? Did the same ones not tap on shoulder a short while after sending an email too?
Post reply on HN